It’s not pathological altruism. It’s hight trust and Aryanism. The same thing that gave us fertile ground for Christianity and white man’s burden, and progressivism, and the same thing that gave the Russians their urge for conquest and empire.
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-29 21:22:00 UTC
It’s not difficult to debate mainstream thinkers. Instead it’s just hard to earn a seat at the table by publishing a book that sells in commercial volume.
That’s what I need to do to go mainstream – although the idea nauseates me a bit.
I suspect it’s hard with a Harris, who is not knowledgeable enough to make the arguments he chases.
But in general the top academics are not hard to debate. Because most arguments come down to either cost, likelihood, or value, and much more rarely fact and theory.
What’s difficult is arguing with self convinced common idiots. Which is more like housekeeping: repetitive drudgery, that we simply must do to keep matters from getting even worse.
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-29 07:29:00 UTC
Just thinking again about colonization post you wrote yesterday.
And just wanted to thank you for what you have taught me. It seems like every time I start to stumble into a hole you save me from it.
Strange synchronicity.
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-29 07:18:00 UTC
This is what happens when your welfare state allows the underclass to breed up!
https://www.facebook.com/peter.brandtman/posts/10209974912987939
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-28 18:48:00 UTC
During the Age of Transformation (Karen Armstrong, Marijia Gimbutas) the military strategy the group used to resist or conquer out-groups determined, and set in mental stone: in myth, tradition, law, literature, norm and value, the consequential metaphysics (assumptions and values) of each civilization. And they survive to this day. In no small part because we have exercised the eugenic or dysgenic values in each of those eras, and to no small degree bred for adaptation to those strategies.
Iranian, Egyptian, Chinese Armies in the river plains
European warrior aristocracy and its militias.
Steppe tribal raiders.
Diasporic traders and wandering herdsmen, gypsies, and pirates.
What we are apparently afraid to face, is that the long term de-civilizing consequences that have led to India and the muslim world, and africa, and now to south america can also be brought here to the upper lattitudes because of our use of fossil fuel heating and air conditioning. Demographic distributions matter more than excellences. No genius can reorganize a society of these imbalances without a return to either working class command economies, or it’s predecessor slavery. It’s simple math. They are too relatively unproductive to generate a concentration of wealth necessary for a voluntary organization of production (capitalism) to create marginal (decidable and influential) differences in reward necessary to form the various networks of hierarchies that as a collective can survive competition.
Man was not oppressed by aristocracy. Man and Woman were domesticated, like every other feral animal, through a continuous process of eugenics that suppressed the lower class reproduction and redistributed reproduction upward, while at the same time increasing the scope of parasitic prohibitions that we call laws, and incrementally forcing everyone into productive activities in order to survive. We sent to war, hung, or starved the rest.
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-28 09:49:00 UTC
CAPLAN ALWAYS REQUIRES A TABLESPOON OF SALT
Caplan’s opinion, like most of his opinions, is not about western civilization in the same sense as westerners use the term in the Greco/Roman, Germanic, or Anglo, American, French, and German enlightenment thinkers: as the struggle for rule of law and truth, goodness and beauty.
Instead, Caplan’s misattribution of ‘western civilization’ is the Cosmopolitan (Ashkenazi) enlightenment vision of a universal market of high consumption combined with the British Imperial Marketplace that transformed British civilization from a germanic Hanseatic one prior to 1830’s expansion of the industrial revolution, to a purely commercial international one after 1830, under Disraeli and Gladstone.
Once you understand that he is not talking about western civilization at all, but cosmopolitan, his arguments are a little more transparent – and always consistent.
The west didn’t develop first, it developed fastest. Why? It’s counter-intuitive: martial epistemology and the oath of the intitatic brotherhood of soldiers, the economics of concentrating family wealth into technology (bronze, horses, chariots and their descendants) for use by professional warriors, and the voluntary construction of armies from these voluntary associations. The reward for which was enfranchisement in freedom: the reciprocal insurance of one’s property from theft and conquest. Conversely given the wetness of our terrain, and its oceans, seas, and rivers, we never had to create a monopoly organization to control irrigation that caused the centralization of authority and capital in the flood-river civilizations. Instead, we constructed manorialism, which was the control of territory and its allocation to those best able to use it.
Out of these conditions we developed argument, reason, common law, natural law, jury, senate, independent judiciary, private property, contract.
And these processes from ideas, to organizations, to production to institutions, to armies can adapt faster as a group than any other known human social order.
So the west defeated the rest not because it was first, because it was fastest. And it was fastest for the simple reason that we discovered ‘truth’ in the objective sense, and it was more valuable to us than the propaganda and deception necessary for central governments to organize multitudes for alternative, more communal, means of production.
We discovered truth. Truth gave us trust. Trust gave us velocity. And we were (and are) faster than the rest because of it.
Truth is the secret of the west.
(That and that we’re the most eugenic civilization aside from the Ashkenazim).
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine.
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-28 08:05:00 UTC
LETS REVISIT THIS:
If your religion is incompatible with natural law then it’s not a religion but a political system for the conduct of warfare by other means.
PERIOD. END OF ARGUMENT. YOU’RE GONE.
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-27 13:18:00 UTC
IS IT PAPALCIDE IF ITS A FALSE POPE?
(Given that the Papal Chair is empty because of these False Popes, is it ok to advocate for his physical removal, without in fact recommending papal-cide? I mean, we’ve killed a whole lotta popes, and a lot of them by strangulation, but not since 1303. And maybe that’s one ancient tradition we should consider restoring. Because this guy is a full blown anti-pope. A heretic that at best should be serving somewhere in south America where he can do less harm)
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-27 13:13:00 UTC
Pretty hard to accuse the libertarians of India and South America of anything other than heroism. Respect from my side.
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-27 12:02:00 UTC
Indian libertarians are my heroes. You guys have your work cut out for you, and you keep at it. It’s awesome. -hugs all.
Source date (UTC): 2016-07-27 12:00:00 UTC