(New or alt?) 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-09 10:26:00 UTC
(New or alt?) 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-09 10:26:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/82302946_550340838896144_758424008235417600_n_550340835562811.jpg OUCH!!
(lol, brilliant)OUCH!!
(lol, brilliant)

Source date (UTC): 2020-01-09 09:17:00 UTC
Great example of Moral Prose (bad) vs Legal Prose (good):
Scapegoating vs Accountability
– vs –
Plausible Deniability vs Warranty.
by James Lyons Sr.
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-09 09:14:00 UTC
Optimum (Best) vs Deterrimum (Worst)
(vocabulary)
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-09 09:12:00 UTC
WE KNOW THE ANSWER NOW.
—“You lose me totally here. It’s ALL about race.”—Cortny
That’s because you’re conflating two issues.
There is no contradiction between ethnonationalism for all to produce optimums for all, and eugenics for all to reduce the worst for all.
In other words under truth (science), under reciprocity and rule of law, with a majority middle class at or above say 105, there is nothing intrinsically bad about any group of humans that prevents them from all the opportunities of western civilization.
“All happy families are the same, all unhappy families are different” and “All domesticatable animals are the same, all undomesticatable animals are different” both express the same argument: a number of things have to go right, any one of which can go wrong and produce failure.
RECIPE
1. A Heroic Narrative of Truth, Duty, Oath and Contract, Heroism, Excellence, Achievement, Mindfulness and The direction of dominance expression to the production of commons.
2. Ethnocentrism, Nationalism, The individual as the subject of Law and the Family as the subject of Policy.
3. Aristotelianism: Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism, Empiricism, Testimonial Truth (science)
4. Rule of law by Natural Law of Reciprocity and markets in everything, including a Market for the Suppression of parasitism in court
5. A Power Distribution of law, Pareto Distribution of Capital, and Nash Distribution of Returns.
6. A majority genetic middle class and the suppression of the reproduction of the underclass (unproductive).
Diversity is a bad. Proximity causes hostility. Both undermine the willingness of peoples to devote resources to the commons and maximize the tragedy of the commons.
We know the answer now. The question is, what people will pursue it, and what people will continue to be a drag on mankind?
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-09 09:10:00 UTC
Wish Fulfillment. The royal family seems to be taking out the trash so to speak. Callgirl got the man-child. But as in all things, exits of defects from the gene pool are a good thing.
(ouch)
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-08 22:50:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/82128034_549985615598333_6227450473209659392_n_549985612265000.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/81725636_549985805598314_1032307089084514304_n_549985802264981.jpg James Santagata is trolling left wing economist Paul Krugman again, and as usual, it’s the work of an artist. And the ‘burn’ is viciously entertaining.
Background: Someone is downloading ch–d p-rn-graphy using Krugman’s ip address (a fairly easy hacker thing to do, and especially if they can get some malicious code on his machine via email.)
(I hope these are ok to post. should be.)


Source date (UTC): 2020-01-08 22:09:00 UTC
NO, YOU DON”T GET IT
I don’t get to ‘appeal’ to markets. The law doesn’t do that. We use the law to create policy that appeals to markets WITHIN the natural law.
I CANT compromise without compromising the law itself.
So no. Propertarianism isn’t an ideology or philosophy it’s just a formal logic of the cognitive, linguistic, psychological, and social sciences.
The propertarian constitution is a movement. We can use propertarianism to create movements. The movement is the restoration and renaissance of western civilization. We can compromise on policy.
But we can’t compromise on truth and reciprocity.
So we have a harder job than theologians, sophists, ideologists, philosophers, pseudoscientists, and outright liars.
(But I do reserve the right to mess around like everyone else does…. lol )
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-08 22:02:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/81633019_549957252267836_4955892836491853824_n_549957248934503.jpg FOOL US TWICE, SHAME ON US.
Why did they invent lying? And why are we susceptible to it? Abrahamic deceit is not backward. It is an advanced technology that like viruses or cancer, that takes advantage of a natural cognitive vulnerability to empathy and suggestion to bypass reason and create addiction. The vast majority of humans have trivial agency and are merely gene machines that imitate others around them. Institutions, Myth, Tradition, Norms are all means of training extremely adaptive domesticated animals to work as a group.
European Civilization Institutions: Competition between
1. Military(Duty – Hierarchy),
2. Traditional Law(Markets Meritocracy),
3. Faith (Piety – Equality)
UNDERMINING
1. Darwin Undermines faith
2. Postwar Jewish Intellectuals Undermine all three.
3. Successful Disintermediation of the Military from Politics.
4. Immigration prevents reformation
The West has maintained a market (not monopoly) between all three Military, Law(Markets), Faith. And they attacked all three. Everyone thinks their ‘discipline(class)’ was the core of european civilization, but it was the balance of powers between them. Like everything in the West, once we have sovereignty we have markets, and tripartism: Military, Law (market), and Faith.
We would have made it without immigration. Just like Rome.
But this is how the (((christians))) destroyed rome. It’s a repeat of the attack on rome by the same people.
Fool us once, shame on them.
Fool use twice shame on us.FOOL US TWICE, SHAME ON US.
Why did they invent lying? And why are we susceptible to it? Abrahamic deceit is not backward. It is an advanced technology that like viruses or cancer, that takes advantage of a natural cognitive vulnerability to empathy and suggestion to bypass reason and create addiction. The vast majority of humans have trivial agency and are merely gene machines that imitate others around them. Institutions, Myth, Tradition, Norms are all means of training extremely adaptive domesticated animals to work as a group.
European Civilization Institutions: Competition between
1. Military(Duty – Hierarchy),
2. Traditional Law(Markets Meritocracy),
3. Faith (Piety – Equality)
UNDERMINING
1. Darwin Undermines faith
2. Postwar Jewish Intellectuals Undermine all three.
3. Successful Disintermediation of the Military from Politics.
4. Immigration prevents reformation
The West has maintained a market (not monopoly) between all three Military, Law(Markets), Faith. And they attacked all three. Everyone thinks their ‘discipline(class)’ was the core of european civilization, but it was the balance of powers between them. Like everything in the West, once we have sovereignty we have markets, and tripartism: Military, Law (market), and Faith.
We would have made it without immigration. Just like Rome.
But this is how the (((christians))) destroyed rome. It’s a repeat of the attack on rome by the same people.
Fool us once, shame on them.
Fool use twice shame on us.

Source date (UTC): 2020-01-08 21:14:00 UTC
( lolz… Stalkers. Hell hath no fury like a rage filled psycho chick scorned. 😉 Remember: men conflict but then are closer when its over. Women never, ever, every stop hating. )
Source date (UTC): 2020-01-08 15:48:00 UTC