Source: Facebook

  • When you do no harm, I have no say. When you do harm, I have a say. When you do

    When you do no harm, I have no say. When you do harm, I have a say. When you do enough harm, you have no say.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-21 13:34:00 UTC

  • Fun: Trash talk flirting with girls who give it back in spades, when both of you

    Fun: Trash talk flirting with girls who give it back in spades, when both of you know it’s safe, because both of you know it’s not going anywhere. lol


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-21 13:32:00 UTC

  • my theory of rationality is just as unappealing to contemporaries as Hume’s was

    my theory of rationality is just as unappealing to contemporaries as Hume’s was to his. Truth isn’t comfortable.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-21 12:57:00 UTC

  • Propertariansim or really, T”he Law of Nature” will be like the Odyssey: a poem,

    Propertariansim or really, T”he Law of Nature” will be like the Odyssey: a poem, forever evolving through iterations of minor improvements. I will never be done with this completely. So that I why I must publish it online. So that it is not fixed and static while I still live and breathe.

    (I need to find a safe place to write for six months. Spartan is fine. It just must be clean warm air conditioned, so my health doesn’t decline. I thought that should have returned to Connecticut and done it. But I do not believe I can write there. I would be better writing in campsites or coffee shops. But a static environment is bad for me.)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-21 08:53:00 UTC

  • The church protects itself, and its bureaucracy, not its people. We must reform

    The church protects itself, and its bureaucracy, not its people.

    We must reform the church, restore it, and eliminate from history the false popes and their marxism.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-21 08:16:00 UTC

  • Q&A: “CURT: WHAT DEFINES MIDDLE CLASS?” —“What defines the middle class accord

    Q&A: “CURT: WHAT DEFINES MIDDLE CLASS?”

    —“What defines the middle class according to you? I go by the British definition” — Dawid Wella

    The common definition is:

    —“the social group between the upper(not working) and working (laboring) classes, including professional and business workers and their families(managerial).”—

    I would use:

    ***”People who calculate, organize, manage, production, distribution, and trade.”***

    Because I think it is the best book yet available, I tend to use Paul Fussel’s book “Class”, and most people who read it are forever changed by it.

    THE BRITISH SYSTEM

    The British system, which is more economically descriptive, if expanded, would be superior to the American which is politically descriptive.

    We have simply had ‘diversity’ longer, so we have ‘softer’ categories in order to eliminate the ‘uncomfortable’ truth that we’re racially stratified as well as occupationally stratified.

    The British Class Model

    British ???? – American Upper Out of Sight Class (the 80 major money families in the states)

    British ???? – American Upper Class (live on money)

    For example, our tech people are hardly classifiable as elites, other than perhpas the Gates’ who have made the transition from commercial to entirely humanitarian occupation.

    British Elite – American Upper Middle Class

    (in america, we refer to elites as people who have political power, not economic power, and who hold utopian visions of the future.)

    Members of the elite class are the top 6% of British society with very high economic capital (particularly savings), high social capital, and very ‘highbrow’ cultural capital. Occupations such as chief executive officers, IT and telecommunications directors, marketing and sales directors; functional managers and directors, barristers and judges, financial managers, higher education teachers,[24] dentists, doctors and advertising and public relations directors were strongly represented.[25] However, those in the established and ‘acceptable’ professions, such as academia, law and medicine are more traditional upper middle class identifiers with IT and sales being the preserve of the economic if not social middle class.

    British Established middle class – American Middle Class

    Members of the established middle class, about 25% of British society, reported high economic capital, high status of mean social contacts, and both high highbrow and high emerging cultural capital. Well-represented occupations included electrical engineers, occupational therapists, midwives, environmental professionals, police officers, quality assurance and regulatory professionals, town planning officials, and special needs teaching professionals.[26]

    British Technical middle class – American Lower Middle Class

    The technical middle class, about 6% of British society, shows high economic capital, very high status of social contacts, but relatively few contacts reported, and moderate cultural capital. Occupations represented include medical radiographers, aircraft pilots, pharmacists, natural and social science professionals and physical scientists, and business, research, and administrative positions.[27]

    British New affluent workers – American Upper Working Class

    New affluent workers, about 15% of British society, show moderately good economic capital, relatively poor status of social contacts, though highly varied, and moderate highbrow but good emerging cultural capital. Occupations include electricians and electrical fitters; postal workers; retail cashiers and checkout operatives; plumbers and heating and ventilation engineers; sales and retail assistants; housing officers; kitchen and catering assistants; quality assurance technicians.[27]

    British Traditional working class – American Middle Working Class

    The traditional working class, about 15% of British society, shows relatively poor economic capital, but some housing assets, few social contacts, and low highbrow and emerging cultural capital. Typical occupations include electrical and electronics technicians; care workers; cleaners; van drivers; electricians; residential, day, and domiciliary care [27]

    British Emergent service sector – American lower working class

    The emergent service sector, about 19% of British society, shows relatively poor economic capital, but reasonable household income, moderate social contacts, high emerging (but low highbrow) cultural capital. Typical occupations include bar staff, chefs, nursing auxiliaries and assistants, assemblers and routine operatives, care workers, elementary storage occupations, customer service occupations, musicians.[27]

    British Precariat – American upper proletarian class

    The precariat, about 15% of British society, shows poor economic capital, and the lowest scores on every other criterion. Typical occupations include cleaners, van drivers, care workers, carpenters and joiners, caretakers, leisure and travel service occupations, shopkeepers and proprietors, and retail cashiers.

    British ???? – American Lower proletarian class

    British ???? – American out-of-sight lower class.

    PROPERTARIANISM

    However, in Propertarianism I do not create a single hierarchy, but three overlapping ‘cones’, where our upper classes specialize in one or more of the three methods of coercion:

    1) The Priesthood: talk/gosip/rallying/shaming, Academy, Politics.

    2) The Judiciary: violence, order, law, war

    3) The Burghers: trade, enterpreneurship, finance, treasury.

    The Four Middle Classes Criteria

    1) Genetic Middle Class (reproductive, associative, economic value – ie: reproductively desirable)

    2) Social Middle Class (bourgeoise manners, ethics, morals, traditions)

    3) Occupational Middle Class (managerial or small business)

    4) Economic Middle Class (free capital for consumption and signaling – ie: home-owner)

    To some degree these overlap considerably. But there is quite a bit of rotation in and out of the middle, even if there very little rotation out of the upper middle (professional class), lots of rotation out of the lower upper class (financiers and politicals) and upper-class (families who maintain excellence over many generations).

    So I use all four circles, and I tend to suggest that it’s all geneetics, and it’s whether you succeed socially, occupationally, and economically that can change the appearance of what class oyu’re in.

    American culture is still fairly favorable for anyone in the middle class to move up socially, econmically, and occupationally, and by offspring, some small chance, if you marry well, genetically.

    SUMMARY

    the middle class contains those people in the four middle class criteria, and divided by specialization into the people who persuade, people who trade, and people who defend limits.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-21 06:48:00 UTC

  • CHRISTIANITY’S GOOD RESULTS Growing up, like a good autistic, I assumed that one

    CHRISTIANITY’S GOOD RESULTS

    Growing up, like a good autistic, I assumed that one’s appearance (attractiveness) was evidence of one’s character. I have no idea why.

    I had a ‘friend’, in high school, who was of southern italian descent. Fair skin, black hair, chiseled but aquiline features, perfect skeleton.

    He wasn’t just handsome, he transgressed it to the point where he was beautiful. This guy couldn’t have had an IQ over 95, and I suspect it was below 90. But he took great care in his appearance, in his behavior (a good catholic), and in his manners.

    It always troubled me.

    But this is how I view christianity. A dim christian is a lot better than a dim anything else. And that’s still a pretty good way of looking at things.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-21 06:26:00 UTC

  • THE LAW OF NATURE IS THE LAW OF GOD. It is far harder to give moral men a licens

    THE LAW OF NATURE IS THE LAW OF GOD.

    It is far harder to give moral men a license to kill than to avoid killing. But once possessed of that license and in the absence of fear of retaliation by his peers, and with the opportunity of accolades and status from his peers, the moral man is an unstoppable warrior.

    I have been endeavoring to provide moral men with moral license to kill, destroy, harm, and if necessary, subjugate, and even enslave, those who would break god’s law: natural law, and speak other than god’s language ‘natural truth’, and govern by other than god’s rule: rule of law.

    Are many gods. Just as there are many suns in the universe. But there is but one set of laws that the universe and we within it operate by. These laws constitute ‘the truth’, and they are the word of the one, and final god, beyond which no other god may transgress.

    Your minor gods will not help you when moral men, with gods language, gods laws, punish you and your gods, for transgressions.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Law of Nature

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-21 06:06:00 UTC

  • WHY COUNTERSIGNAL? —“Curt: Why go out of your way to counter-signal?”— I hav

    WHY COUNTERSIGNAL?

    —“Curt: Why go out of your way to counter-signal?”—

    I have followers from around the world, in all colors, and I view my work as a universal solution for advocating paternal nationalism under which all tribes can transcend the burdens of their lower classes, and predation by ruling classes – and to so morally.

    So as a general rule, I disassociate myself from anti-whatever organizations and advocate for solutions that enable each group to transcend.

    There is a great difference between resistance movements and revolutionary reformations. Resistance has not worked.

    WN is not successful and cannot be. Neo-reaction and paleo’s could be. The alt-right might evolve to influential. Of the older generations, The religious, The traditional(familial), jeffersonian(legal) have been only successful by stalling the onslaught.

    But The New Right will be. Because we give each group the argumentative, institutional, and revolutionary tools for positive change, rather than mere resistance.

    How you argue reflects your class, ability, and knowledge to argue.

    Aristocracy argues as a wise but determined father.

    That is our role as ‘warriors’, ‘head-men’, ‘chieftains’, ‘generals’, and ‘kings’: to JUDGE.

    We just needed a scientific method of judgment.

    And that’s what I’ve given us.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-21 04:09:00 UTC

  • Its about you

    Its about you


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-20 15:39:00 UTC