Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • WORDS AND IDEAS AS RISKY BEHAVIOR I understand. Some people want to experiment w

    WORDS AND IDEAS AS RISKY BEHAVIOR

    I understand. Some people want to experiment with physical risk, some with sexual risk, some with chemical risk, and some of us with verbal risk. In other words, we all want to obtain stimuli from exploring new sensations with the method of sensory acquisition that’s most rewarding for us. When you take physical risk of skydiving or surfing it’s likely that you’ll hurt only unless you get a rescue worker harmed trying to save you. When you experiment with sexual risk, you can spread disease, or interfere with relationships and families. When you take chemical risk you can hurt yourself, but you can also use machines and vehicles, or even words, that bring you and others to harm. When you experiment with words and ideas you can bring yourself to harm, you can speak and bring others to harm, and if you’re very good at it, and promote or publish it, you can cause the deaths of more people than anything other than the great plagues.

    We all want to ignore external costs to others. We all want to say our pursuits of stimulation are not harmful to others. But it’s always false.

    What’s counter-intuitive, is that the most dangerous things you can do to others is to promote damaging ideas.

    The only worse thing you can do is engineer contagious diseases.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-27 05:34:00 UTC

  • English: Ice. ice. Polilsh: lod lodu Ukrainian: leed lo’du Russian: led l’da. Th

    English: Ice. ice.

    Polilsh: lod lodu

    Ukrainian: leed lo’du

    Russian: led l’da.

    These languages kill me.

    They have this language here called Sool-zheek. Which is sort of a pidgin. They mix words from all three languages. And it’s considered sort of like southern drawl maybe: uncooth or ‘country folk’.

    So not only do you have these three languages going on if you travel around, but you have the omg-number of suffixes, PLUS the fact that you can order the words however you want in a sentence.

    Now, I”m a linguistic plebian. I’ve studied french, german, spanish and informally italian, and retained nothing at all once the class was over.

    But you konw, these languages are nothing like learning the germanic. it’s brutal.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-27 05:25:00 UTC

  • PSYCHOLOGISM VS INCENTIVES I tend to ignore psychological states, and stick with

    PSYCHOLOGISM VS INCENTIVES

    I tend to ignore psychological states, and stick with observed actions, since reported ‘belief’ and demonstrated behavior are so widely different. So I would say you can insure something yourself at which point you do not have rights or property, only things under your control given the amount of resistance you can put up, versus when you and your possessions are insured by a group, where you have rights to call upon them to increase the amount of resistance you can put up.

    As David Mondrus has suggested, this is the dividing line between libertarianism and propertarianism.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-27 05:13:00 UTC

  • WE DIDN’T DOMESTICATE THE R-SELECTORS. BUT WE CAN. Well, I’m not anti-genetics,

    WE DIDN’T DOMESTICATE THE R-SELECTORS. BUT WE CAN.

    Well, I’m not anti-genetics, I’m anti-falsehood, anti-deception, and anti-dysgenia.

    But when I tell people that “all Jews are female” J mean to suggest that just as we western men are the intellectual advocates of scientific k-selection, jews are the intellectual advocates of the pseudoscientific r-selection. And that is the role Jews play in intellectual history – before we domesticate them as we had begun to prior to the second world war and the invasion of eastern European and Russian jews. Our lesson is that we insufficiently domesticated both our women and our jews, by extending the license for free speech we gave to other warriors (enfranchised males) to women and jews, without maintaining the THREAT that we maintained with enfranchised: violence.

    Had we put jews and women to the duel, maintained the punishment for deception in the commons, maintained libel, maintained slander, and never adopted tolerance for their ridiculousness, we would not have lost our civilization.

    I’d prefer to live in a world with women and jews. I’d just prefer that we don’t let them destroy the civilization that makes possible the liberty of women and jews to think, speak, and act ridiculous and against our interests.

    (That’s probably quotable)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-27 05:12:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://www.facebook.com/jeffreytucker.official/posts/1190920210946950

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-27 04:20:00 UTC

  • LAW, SCIENCE, OUR DEMANDS, AND REBELLION Well, we CAN’T teach law as science any

    LAW, SCIENCE, OUR DEMANDS, AND REBELLION

    Well, we CAN’T teach law as science any longer because of the conflation between regulation, legislation, and Natural Law, where regulation and legislation are not bound by Natural Law. We cease having law that is categorically, internally, externally, and morally consistent, and therefore we no longer possess rule of law, but rule of discretion: the need for subjective information not provided by the law.

    If we taught Natural Law, common, judge-discovered law, universal standing, universal application (rule of law), and that it was possible to create strictly constructed, categorically, internally, externally, morally, scope, consistent law, then we could teach law as social science not ‘an attempt at unbiased discretion’ while advancing some agenda or other.

    We CAN teach law as social science, and we can live under a scientific and contractual government (rule of law: nomocracy). But to do so will require as violent a revolution as all other anglo revolutions: to raise the cost of discretionary, and arbitrary rule, such that non-discretionary rule of law is preferable to constant rebellion.

    This is our mission really.

    1 – demand for rule of law: natural law, judge-discovered common law, universal standing, and universal applicability.

    2 – demand for multi-house, market government, under legal dissent rather than majority assent.

    3 – demand for the defense of the informational commons

    4 – demand for the restoration of the militia and the regiments.

    5 – demand for the circumvention of the financial system in the issuance of liquidity.

    And to issue these demands, then interrupt and destroy the economy and the abilty to rule until there is no alternative left but the restoration of moral and scientific government instead of corrupt, immoral, and discretionary government.

    Fire is our first technology of mass destruction

    And it is still our best.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-27 04:18:00 UTC

  • THE OWNERSHIP SPECTRUM This might help everyone demarcate the different terms. u

    THE OWNERSHIP SPECTRUM

    This might help everyone demarcate the different terms.

    unaffilliated(individual) -> citizen(insured) -> stakeholder(in unenumerated commons) -> shareholder(enumerated commons) -> partner(inter personal decidability) -> “executive”(leadership decidability) -> (sole)owner(limited decidability) -> unaffilliated uninsured individual (total decidabilty)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-27 04:01:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxpVwBzFAkw

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-27 01:29:00 UTC

  • TO MY UKRAINIAN FRIENDS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HILLARY AND YANUKOVYCH IS THAT AM

    TO MY UKRAINIAN FRIENDS

    THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HILLARY AND YANUKOVYCH IS THAT AMERICAN IS RICHER SO IT JUST TAKES LONGER.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-26 12:15:00 UTC

  • Interesting phenomenon. If I say something that requires a bit of contemplation,

    Interesting phenomenon. If I say something that requires a bit of contemplation, people get it correctly – with work.

    If I say the same thing fairly colloquially, people react to it without thinking about it – usually by projecting their pet issues.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-26 07:32:00 UTC