The difference is that I know I am a bit eccentric, or even nuts. But it’s limited to my emotions and intuitions, not my reason.
Why do you think I developed my reason so thoroughly? I can’t trust my emotions or intuitions at all.
It’s not complicated. Nothing is all that complicated.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-28 05:51:00 UTC
WINDOW INTO MY WORK STYLE
(I find this humorous myself)
I have open right now a script for a presentation I’m working on for a pitch to a company.
I have three relatively long posts open on three different subjects.
When I have another idea I open another window and jot it down.
I bounce between these ideas and work on what comes to mind. I do not try to control my mind. I just ‘let it happen’. When I try I have to fight the huge steam-powered autistic monster in my head. So I just go with it.
This has turned out to be really effective method of working. Not disciplining my mind, but moving between ideas as it desires to.
When I tell people ‘just write’ this is the best way to do it that I know of. Write what your intuition wants to. Over time you will develop skill at using your intution.
Reason is weak. That’s why.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-28 05:39:00 UTC
CULTURAL OBSERVATIONS
Man yelling at waitress for disrespecting him. Waitress not being offended but assuming he’s not thinking clearly. This is one of the great differences between the culture of status and blame we have in america and the one that was ancient, but that the soviets imposed upon all. You can say “i did the right thing as I understood it” but you cannot say “you are a bad person and I am above you”. This “appeal to reasonableness” is a superior means of argument and you see it in certain classes but not in others. Why? It’s a big ‘shame’ in america to fail in thinking, but not a big shame to fail in business. In this country it’s the opposite. Its normal to fail in thinking – you just need to be understood – but it’s not ok to fail in business – they assume you’re a crook.
If we had rule of law here it would be a much superior society than that of the west.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-28 05:34:00 UTC
DOESN”T EVERYONE TRY TO LIE CHEAT AND STEAL?
Is libertarianism merely an attempt by the middle class to obtain status and power parity with the judicial-military upper class, without paying the (dear) costs to the relationship to their customers and market that truth, judgment, policing, and warfare entail?
Isn’t Jewish libertinism an attempt not only to escape those costs, but the costs of producing the commons AS WELL?
Isn’t it necessary for commissions (dividends) from the market produced by the judicial-military imposition of order, just compensation for the high cost to their lives, livelihoods, relationships and families?
Isn’t feminism and socialism just an attempt to circumvent the exchange of sex, care, and servitude for the results of the production of order, the production of goods and services, and the production of generations by the family?
Aristocracy (martial/judicial – limits )
Priestly (public intellectual – advocacy)
Burgher (organization of production distribution and trade)
Labor (production of goods and services)
Family (production of generations)
Underclass (those who cannot contribute but just cost)
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-28 05:24:00 UTC
GIVING OTHER MEN ‘PERMISSION’
(cute story)
I was with Liliya and the boys the other day, and we were in a chocolate shop, letting the kids choose which piece of identically flavored but different shaped chocolate that they wanted. (The older one is a bit greedy and impulsive so he wants to see if he can get more than one out of me – knowing I am a sucker – but I’m adamant that they get only one.)
So I’m standing there as usual typing away on my iPhone and this young couple, maybe twenty years old, is all mushy and romantic in the corner, and just as I look up, I catch his eyes – he subconsciously wants to make sure he hasn’t impugned his masculinity somehow as he returns to reality.
So I smile and start laughing. Give him a thumbs up. Grab Lilia and kiss her. Saying “See. It’s ok. If we all do it.”
They know enough English to understand. And we each chuckle for a few minutes.
If you only seek to ENTERTAIN, not to OBTAIN, you can make the world a better place.
Little things matter. Because little things in large numbers have vast consequences.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-28 05:07:00 UTC
Let me say that again.
***Part of being a man of good character is killing those that need killing for the sake of your family, tribe, and nation.***
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-28 04:54:00 UTC
A LESSON FOR WESTERN MEN IN THE MEANING OF CHARACTER
(important lesson)
When an average middle aged Ukrainian male gets the opportunity to talk with an American man who does not judge him, (and who has a laptop for translation) he acts like a man who has found water in the desert. He just wants “to understand”. But really, he want’s to know that he is ‘ok’. That his poor life is a property of circumstance, and not character. (it is a product of circumstance)
When a young Ukrainian male gets the opportunity to speak with us, he desperately seeks opportunity.
When a young Ukrainian female gets the opportunity to speak with us, it’s not quite as impressive, since she probably worked very hard to learn English.
When an uncultured young Ukrainian female gets the opportunity to speak with us, she is looking for an ATM and a Passport.
These people are deprived of EXPERIENCES that fiat credit makes possible in a functioning society with rule of law.
I love all of them, and my compassion for their plight is endless.
LESSON FOR WESTERN MEN
The Ukrainian men are poor, and their government corrupt, because the militant right is simply not large enough, to kill enough politicians to stop them.
There are endless mercenaries who will fight a civil war on behalf of the oligarchs. (This is the fear of everyone here. civil war.)
There are a limited number of men (like us) in every civilization, that will fight for the NATION.
If you do not fight for the nation, you become one of those middle and late age men thinking you were of good character.
BUT BEING OF GOOD CHARACTER MEANS KILLING THOSE WHO NEED KILLING ON THE BEHALF OF YOUR NATION.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-28 04:54:00 UTC
French women still seek to build grace the best.
Germanics do pride with out pretense well.
Northern Protestants are too humble.
The slavic women,on sunday, for church, can retain their feminine beauty into old age.
The slavs and nordics have the best frames – they are less outbred. The nordics a bit heavier masculine bias, and the slavs a bit fairer feminine bias.
Men – we measure ourselves largely but the quality of our women.
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-28 04:40:00 UTC
Well, we have a movement. And we can turn it into a revolution.
Do not give into emotional temptation.
( Eli Harman William Butchman Steve Pender )
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-28 04:32:00 UTC
RESTITUTION AND PUNISHMENT ARE EVERY MAN’S PRICE OF LIBERTY.
Every Man A Sheriff
– I advocate restitution and punishment for the crimes of murder, harm, destruction, theft, fraud (in all its forms), socialization of losses and privatization of commons, conspiracy, conversion, invasion, war, and conquest – Any violation of natural law.
– I advocate the death penalty when it is the only restitution possible for the severity of the crime.
– I advocate severity, and public execution, enumerating crimes, in order to enforce norm and law through exemplary education.
– I advocate regicide just as I advocate war when these are the only choices of restitution open to us.
– It is undesirable to take pleasure in taking life, but that is only so that we do not host among us, those whose pleasure in taking life might be a danger to us.
Other than contractually – in matters of truth-test – I do not view any man as equal to another, and I view the world as a hierarchy where we make best use of our cognitive abilities and baises. I am, I think correct, in stating that despite our vast differences we can calculate common means to uncommon ends, and live in harmony, if we can engage in cooperation under natural law on the one hand and constantly cull the bottom that cannot engage in cooperation under natural law on the other.
But just as some people must advocate for change, some people advocate for production, some people must JUDGE by natural law if we are to LIVE Under natural law.
I would judge the assassination of Merkel as judgment for crimes committed. In fact, regicide as a long and successful history of limiting the kind of abuses we see in political orders in modernity.
I would judge the assassination of a whole host of leaders – Obama among them – as just punishment and the only restitution possible for his crimes.
I would judge that regents should fear the people whenever possible, just as I would judge that those who would find crime easier than production must fear prosecution by those who would not enage in parasitism.
It is not my nature to take pleasure in suffering. It is my responsibility to prosecute, perform restitution, and if necessary kill those, who violate the law of nature, under which we prosper, and without which we suffer in poverty, ignorance, disease, mysticism, deceit, and predation.
Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2016-08-27 21:31:00 UTC