Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • Q: WHAT IS THE SMALLEST POSSIBLE LIST OF LITERARY (AESTHETIC) ARISTOCRATIC AUTHO

    Q: WHAT IS THE SMALLEST POSSIBLE LIST OF LITERARY (AESTHETIC) ARISTOCRATIC AUTHORS?

    (Whose writings will survive another 1000 years?)

    1) Joseph de Maistre

    2) Julius Evola

    3) Nietzsche

    ???

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 15:45:00 UTC

  • (yeah, getting my health back. Getting my edgy back.)

    (yeah, getting my health back. Getting my edgy back.)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 15:35:00 UTC

  • THE INCREASE IN MALE SUICIDE IS EVIDENCE OF WOMEN’S ABANDONMENT OF THE EXCHANGE

    THE INCREASE IN MALE SUICIDE IS EVIDENCE OF WOMEN’S ABANDONMENT OF THE EXCHANGE OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY. SO WHY NOT ABANDON THE EXCHANGE OF LIMITING OUR ENSLAVEMENT IN EXCHANGE FOR MARRIAGE?

    There is no reason to remove women from domesticated slavery if the consequence is their abandonment of the compromise of marriage, early calorie transfer, and late return. If we are to live late and uncared for seeking suicide in ever greater numbers so that women can expand their insatiable nesting urge, including the consumption of our millennia of accumulated genetic, cultural, institutional, normative, informational, and material capital, then there is no value in our release of them from slavery into the market for production.

    In other words, it is either marriage and family before individual, so that we equally benefit from the intertemporal demands of our biology, or we might as well just return women to domestic slavery.

    It’s not complicated. Marriage and reproductive constraint is a compromise. Break the exchange and we do not retain the redistributive benefits of female participation in the market men have made, but instead, we return to that prior era where the market is the domain of men, and women are once again herded for our purposes like all other animals.

    None of us gets what we want. We get only the best that is possible.

    Everyone in every civilization thinks their norms are a force of gravity. But the only force of gravity in human existence is ability to organize to use violence to obtain what we desire over that which others desire – in where there is no right, there is only what is possible. There is no property there is only possession.

    So we can either return to a world of voluntary exchanges from the extraction of resources from our most productive males, or we can return to the world in which our least productive males use violence to enslave and make use of that which they choose to.

    Civilizations are very fragile things.

    Men are not very smart – certainly not smarter than traditions they do not understand. And women seek to avoid that understanding in order to fulfill their urges, regardless of the cost to men.

    Civilization consists of forcing trades.

    if you abandon those trades, we return to uncivilized behavior: force.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Cult of Sovereignty

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Natural Law of the West

    The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 15:34:00 UTC

  • “The current male suicide epidemic is better example of consequences of damage a

    —“The current male suicide epidemic is better example of consequences of damage accumulation on the part of men on behalf of women and children.”— Matej Lovrić

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 15:23:00 UTC

  • “Modern day feminism has nothing to do with equality. It is about putting women

    —“Modern day feminism has nothing to do with equality. It is about putting women above the other gender for (name your cliche) reason (s).”— Katie McCracken (via Andrew Amelang)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 15:20:00 UTC

  • ( I FINALLY FEEL LIKE I CAN WRITE LIKE I WISH TO. IT TOOK FIFTEEN YEARS OF WORK)

    ( I FINALLY FEEL LIKE I CAN WRITE LIKE I WISH TO. IT TOOK FIFTEEN YEARS OF WORK)

    I had to develop a language, develop a complete philosophical framework, but I can now describe western civilization in ratio-scientific language, and state how to restore it to its former glory.

    Thank you to all who helped me on this journey to at least marginal comprehensibility. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 13:48:00 UTC

  • UM. I DO TRUTH. PROPAGANDA IS A NECESSARY TOOL IN THE ABSENCE OF THE NECESSITY O

    UM. I DO TRUTH. PROPAGANDA IS A NECESSARY TOOL IN THE ABSENCE OF THE NECESSITY OF TRUTH.

    —Q&A–“Curt, what is your opinion on Kek?—

    I am a New Right Philosopher. I work on changing our understanding of reality, and reforming our institutions to correspond to contemporary reality. My philosophy is reducible to increasing the prior scope of law from property and deception, to all information present in the commons, and the reformation of government to restore the market for commons between the classes – that have different interests. And to restore the purpose of policy to the family while preserving the purpose of law to the individual. By doing so I wish to restore our sovereignty, liberty, freedom, and subsidy, as well as our market for quality families, market for commons, market for leadership, and market for the resolution of disputes.

    I see propaganda and ridicule as a tactic against the working class just as I am using a tactic against the upper classes. So it’s just propaganda.

    I deal with truth.

    So aside from the observation that the adoption of Marxist ridicule rallying and shamming as a means of neutralizing rallying and shaming, seems to work, I don’t have any opinion. And it isn’t even vaguely interesting except that I recognize it’s value in a democracy where lies and propaganda re legal. i would prefer that all leftist parasitism was prosecutable as harm to the informational commons just as are libel and slander are harmful to individuals.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Cult of Sovereignty.

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Social Science of Western Civilization

    The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 13:43:00 UTC

  • BUT CURT. CANT I HAVE POLY-LOGICAL LAW? DOESN’T LIBERTARIANISM HAVE SOME EXCUSE

    BUT CURT. CANT I HAVE POLY-LOGICAL LAW? DOESN’T LIBERTARIANISM HAVE SOME EXCUSE TO SURVIVE? (NO)

    I think that the decidability of sovereignty forces natural law, which in turn forces markets for rule (monarchy), and markets for commons (government), and markets for goods and services (economies), and markets for reproduction (marriage), and markets for consumption (voluntary exchange).

    i think that if you have sovereignty then liberty and freedom and subsidy are possible, so long as you limit the scale of those who need subsidy to that which does not impeded competitive productivity among competing polities.

    i think if you are stating a preference for poly logical law then that is no sovereignty, nor liberty, nor subside, but discretionary rule.

    I think if you construct a polity out of contracts for exchanges within the limits of sovereign natural law, then you can do whatever you wish that allows you to survive competition with other polities for members — and for tolerating your existence.

    I think that if you do not produce competitive commons than no such polity can create sovereignty, liberty, freedom and subsidy, and I think that no such polity can survive competition for people, and the record would indicate no such polity can survive tolerance from competitors because of the people that prefer such a polity (pirates and free riders), and I think that the only evidence of such polities is as outposts under strong empires who grant greater free riding in exchange for holding claims on the territory in the empire’s name, thereby giving excuse to that empire to war with others if they seek to obtain futures on the resources there.

    As far as I know that set of paragraphs is the end of libertarianism except as cheap option-buying of resources by empires and states of sufficient military power to ensure them.

    Just as I am sure that all Jewish colonies are merely options on using them as tax collectors, money changers, and loan sharks without subjecting the nobility to the risk of disapproval that is a necessary byproduct of taking advantage of consumers by means of interest.

    There is no value in consumer interest on consumption. There is only value in interest on experiment that might lead to cheaper and more varied consumption.

    That again, is an end to yet another mythos.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 13:35:00 UTC

  • PHILOSOPHY AND LAW AS INSTRUMENTS —“Looking at philosophy and law as tools or

    PHILOSOPHY AND LAW AS INSTRUMENTS

    —“Looking at philosophy and law as tools or instruments rather than moral imperatives helps one process these ideas much easier in the modern sense. When I look at civilization I see the instrument panel of a jetliner. One or two mistakes and the entire plane comes crashing down. I feel that focusing on getting the audience to switch their perspectives on such matters would aid us in reforming the west. The moral/emotional perspective of today must be radically altered and reframed.”— Murray (sock? Sell

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 13:23:00 UTC

  • “Parasitism or leftism is simply a tool used to transfer wealth using moral and

    —“Parasitism or leftism is simply a tool used to transfer wealth using moral and emotional blackmail first,and the barrel of a gun later. In the closed nationstate model of the 20th century it was used to shift blocks of capital to different competing institutions. In a global neoliberal anarchic sense it’s used to loot dying nation states and transfer wealth to global oligarchic power confederacies. We must (temporarily?) embrace nationalism not necessarily along moral lines (nationalism has become a form of nostalgic romanticism that is fun obviously) but as “firewalls” against nomadic oligarchs looting and robbing and destroying our crumbling cultural and and bureaucratic institutions.”— Murray Sell

    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-06 13:21:00 UTC