https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/796739695686385665/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=796739695686385665THE “TALK” FOR MILLENNIALS AND Z’S
#generationZ #millennials #Conservative #Libertarian https://t.co/2xxFZtyXnZ
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 10:42:00 UTC
THE MARKET FOR LIES ARGUMENT HAS EXPLANATORY POWER
—“The ‘market for lies’ argument is novel inasmuch as it postulates a meritocratic, incentive-based theory for the organization of the production of lies (misinformation-industrial-complex). I think the model can survive criticism because it isn’t dependent on the assumption of conspiracy or historical context, though those criteria can be considered in seeking its limits and particularities.”— James Augustus Berens.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 09:52:00 UTC
RUSSIANS AND ANGLOS AS INSURER OF THE WORLD SYSTEM
The Russians are better negotiators, better spies, better warriors, and better guarantors of keeping peace and order. In no small part because they are suspicious, unforgiving, and ‘clear’.
Russian is not a commercial, political, diplomatic, language. It is a martial language. The Americans are better judges, and escrow-holders, diplomats, and commercial investors. The British are better bankers, more able to maintain cultural distance than the Americans. And insulated from the problems of corruption in Russia.
This is an exceptional partnership for the world: American defense of commerce and trade, and are flexible on such matters; British defense of Banking and Credit, and are flexible on such matters; and Russian defense of people, politics, capital, and territory, and are pragmatically flexible on such things.
“You really want to work with me. Because If you don’t work with me you work with the Russians. Russians have zero tolerance for threats.” vs “You are wasting my time. This is not serious. This is something for Americans.”
“Yeah, we could get away with that under the Americans, But we the Russians will just blow up everything and kill us.” vs “The Americans are too religious about such things, the British are more practical”.
Russia’s internal problem is trust, black markets, and a judiciary, and bureaucracy open to ‘influence’ (corruption). Britain’s problem is infantilization and hyper-moralism on anything visible – thankfully money is invisible.
American political processes are corrupt as hell, but the courts and the media do a very good job of insulating the commercial sector from the corruption of the government.
The germans build things. Until they get their balls back they’re pretty much useless. And the only way to do that is to withdraw from Europe so that they have no choice.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 09:46:00 UTC
PROPERTARIAN NATURAL LAW IS JUST ‘EASIER’
Humor aside, Strictly Constructed Propertarian Law is soooo much easier to adjudicate than all the accidents of error and malice that constitute current law.
Simple law is good law. Natural Law is a simple law. Becuase it uses very simple decidability.
The problem then is only ‘who to believe’.
Most of the time, that’s the main issue in court.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 09:32:00 UTC
In this region of Connecticut, I’m surrounded by these 90-95 IQ Sicilians and Southern Italians. Traditional. Familial. Hard Working. Proud.
Now Italians, Irish and Poles had a very bad influence on this area (god forbid you tell them that), but not as bad as the blacks have had on the ‘shit-cities’ of Springfield, Hartford, Marien, North-Haven, New-Haven, Bridgeport, Bristol, and Danbury. Or the absolute devastation caused by the Puerto Ricans (Technically Carribean by Culture) have had on places like New Haven.
Irish aren’t german or English but they’ve done some good in the middle-class Italians at least keep (tacky) working class homes, and small businesses (and are great at it). My own people’s underclass is freaking frightening (as are the french underclasses here). I mean, I want to sanitize my gene pool and the commons.
But my point is that you can try to make it to the aristocratic high investment parenting, highly selective mating, high capital accumulating, and executive classes. But if you simply make it to the Italian/Sicillian level with a strong traditional family, with pride, you can still make a nice commons to live in even if you’re below 100 on the scale.
Our problem is that once you drop below 90 (the majority of the black and puerto-rican communities) you simply cannot put together a civilization unless the administration is run by people who compensate for your deficiencies. In other words, self-government is a problem of distributions.
I don’t know what that hill-living sheep-and-goat herding, black haired, (I think they’re “I’s”???) gene pool from southern europe is but they are more passionate and much more distributed at the lower end. But they seem to be able to build good families with ease.
Family structures reflect class structures, and the monopoly on family structure is not helpful. The aristocracy does not need familial insurance, and the peasantry does. And the implusive that cannot form families and are stuck in serial ‘baby dady’ relationships are just damaging to the societies that host them.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 09:30:00 UTC
MICRO MAJORITARIAN DEMOCRACY VS MACRO MARKET FOR COMMONS.
My opinion (from the data) is that in all countries, where there is any heterogeneity at all, people vote as racial and tribal blocks. It’s only under homogeneity that people vote as POLICY BLOCKS.
Democracy is sufficient for the selection of priorities among people with identical interests.
But markets are necessary for the exchange of commons among people with heterogeneous interests.
In my opinion – and history will bear me out – markets are always better than majorities except in small homogenous countries where revenues from the commons are so small and diversity of interests so small, that competition for commons simply turns into another form of rent seeking.
(so yes, I’ve thought this thru)
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 09:12:00 UTC
–“F–K TRUMP”– (an sjw)
A lot of women like you want to F–k Trump. But they aren’t hot enough for him to bother. He’s not Clinton. He has taste.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 09:06:00 UTC
WALL THE IMMIGRANT CITIES INTO SLUMS AND WALL THE SOUTHERN BORDER. THE SEAS FORM THE OTHER WALLS
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 09:00:00 UTC
TRUMP ONLY BUYS US TIME. CLINTON WOULD HAVE GIVEN US A REVOLUTION. WE MUST MOVE AGGRESSIVELY AND QUICKLY
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 08:59:00 UTC
DEAR SNOWFLAKES
Dear Snowflakes.
Why on earth should adults with assets, experience, and responsibilities not simply discipline your infantilized, undisciplined, barbaric, ignorant, irresponsible, uselessness, for what it is: a waste of oxygen, water, food, and space?
The market for survival, the market for reproduction, the market for production of goods, services, and information, the market for commons, the market for polities, the market for dispute resolution.
You don’t have any rights that others won’t exchange with you.
We don’t need to exchange rights with you.
Because you have NOTHING TO EXCHANGE.
So why don’t we just beat or enslave your useless, whining, undisciplined, barbaric, ignorant, irresponsible meat-sacks?
You aren’t entering the world you were promised by the lies and propaganda. You’re entering a world in which the advantages that your European predecessors and ancestors have made has been squandered by the generations that infantilized you.
Welcome to the world of the ordinary.
Becuase of you, and the generations that squandered your inheritance on third world undomesticated animals, you’re going to live in relative poverty like all the rest of the world.
And you won’t change that because everything you have been taught and value is a lie designed to make you nothing more than a useful slave to be farmed like animals by a political elite.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 08:57:00 UTC