Retweeted Deplorable Eli (@MartianHoplite):
No compromises, no concessions, no olive branches, no considerations, no clemency, no good sportsmanship. We hold all the cards. #MAGA
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 15:13:00 UTC
Retweeted Deplorable Eli (@MartianHoplite):
No compromises, no concessions, no olive branches, no considerations, no clemency, no good sportsmanship. We hold all the cards. #MAGA
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 15:13:00 UTC
https://t.co/ZhQh8TrAR8BANE TO AMERICAN ELITES
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 15:12:00 UTC
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/796782309798281217/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=796782309798281217A Reply To Paul Krugman’s Rumination On Why White People Aren’t all Dead Yet. @paulkrugman @conservative @libertarian @nrx https://t.co/YMfaLMxBnB
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 13:31:00 UTC
(woman) —“Y’all. But Curt, I had seven kids. What’s my problem?”—
Hard to know. Some defects are simply genetic. Some parents are incompetent. Some undesirable. Some people irredeemable.
(some people just hand the openings to you on a silver platter)
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 12:46:00 UTC
I want to drink 30 year scotch from Paul Krugman’s Skull.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 12:38:00 UTC
PAUL KRUGMAN – HE’S WISHING WHITE PEOPLE DEAD EVEN SOONER
(profound) (read) (share)
—“Searching for economic and cultural reasons why
middle-aged white Americans are dying sooner.”— Paul Krugman
Because you destroyed the family – intentionally, through policy that favored moving labor to capital instead of capital to labor?
Because you destroyed the family by ideologically mobilizing women in the workforce, rather than ending their prohibition on it?
Because you increased and consumed all the taxes that were produced by women’s entry into the work force so that they cannot afford to stay home and have children, build strong durable families? Teach civilization and civilized behavior? Even if they choose to?
Because cheap underclass immigration has displaced white youth and white post-career labor, resulting in over fed-ed, over-told, over-sold, overweight, under-exercised people, lacking any culture and tradition?
Because you destroyed our rule of law by intentional assault on the constitution through selective attempts to exploit weaknesses in the fourteenth amendment,and along with education and economic policies, burned down our 4000 years of accumulated genetic, cultural, institutional, and informational capital?
Because you and your ideology destroyed our culture, our arts, our civic society, our families, and through hyper-consumption in youth confined our people to lonely, illness, in nursing and retirement death-farms?
You and yours have made death camps just as heinous, but killing more softly and slowly the civilization that hosts you? Using the same excuse that your predecessors were initially sold?
What will happen to civil rights (Legally Granted Non-Meritocratic Privileges to displace white people)?
We restore them to exchanges of performance rather than grants in exchange for rents?
If we changed from FREE speech to FREE TRUE speech, that would only silence pseudoscientific and pseudo-rational speech.
If we relied on TRUTHFUL speech that would mean only warrantied, an operationally stated speech (Science). No economics then.
Well sewing straw men via gossip is a form of deceit, isn’t it? Why don’t we just restore rule of law and strict construction?
With Rule of Law, Strict Construction from Fully Informed Voluntary transfer, and Warrantied Truthful Speech, we’re good right?
We just saw the end to Cosmopolitan Pseudoscience Paul. Late, but not too late. Boaz, Marx, Freud, Adorno, and Krugman.
There is only one empirical social science: Judge Discovered, Natural, Common, Law.
Productive, Fully informed, Warrantied, Voluntary Transfer, Limited To Productive Externalities. That’s Natural Law:Social Science.
Hopefully, my generation will repair economics by legal and logical compatibility with natural law, ending a century of pseudoscience.
And when combined with direct redistribution of liquidity to consumers via electronic banking, we will end Rule By Fiat Credit.
And by ending Rule By Fiat Credit will end the century of spending down accumulated genetic, cultural, institutional capital.
And we will relegate Marxist, Keyesian, Postmodern, Pseudoscientific leftist economics of cherry picking by selective measurement of changes in capital to the successor to phlogiston theory. And you will be the subject of equal ridicule for centuries.
I understand what just happened. The genetic, cultural, and institutional loans were non-performing, and the investors just sold.
WE SOLD. AND YOU’RE BANKRUPT. AND NOW YOU’RE GOING TO PRISON FOR YOUR PYRAMID SCHEME ECONOMIC FRAUD
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 12:27:00 UTC
FREE TRADE FRAUD
Ok, so if the retail price of a car is $300 cheaper for the consumer if its assembled in mexico, and the tradeoff is that our black unemployment is increased, is that really a net gain? You see? Consumption is not a net good. ONLY FULL ACCOUNTING tells you.
(finally some black men are waking up to the fact that the democrats fucked their whole race over. destroyed their families. and that at least trump will try to get their jobs back.)
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 11:46:00 UTC
In case you were wondering, on average, a 100 watt light bulb costs about one penny per hour at .15/kwh. Which still seems absurdly high to me.
(876kwh *.15kwh) / (24h * 365d) = 0.01
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 11:36:00 UTC
MOLYNEUX IS AN EDUCATOR AND I AM A PROSECUTOR – BUT OTHERWISE ITS THE SAME MESSAGE
Stephan won’t engage me. It’s a loss for the movement really. The contrast would be brilliant.
SECRET: I might be an effete, but I know who I am marketing to: the same as Trump-the people willing to fight.
Stephan argues MORAL CHOICE, and I argue LEGAL LIMITS. His Golden rule and my Silver. But it’s the same msg.
It’s sometimes hard to grasp the difference between creating MORAL POSSIBILITY and limiting IMMORAL ACTIONS.
Western Civilization does not engage in conflation, so RELIGION, MORALITY, and LAW are different disciplines.
Stephan practices Moral Philosophy,and I Practice Moral LAW. (Positive advocacy vs Negative threat). Same Msg
We require BOTH. Positive advocacy for the purpose of pedagogy, and negative prohibition for limits.
This is why Stephan’s work and mine overlap so much, but ‘sound’ different. He’s a teacher, I’m a prosecutor.
And if you understand scientific epistemology that’s how it functions: positive THEORY and negative TEST.
Stephan made a career out of educating. I’ve made a body of law, and I teach prosecutors. It’s that simple.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 11:08:00 UTC
https://twitter.com/SmilinJackOne/status/796643483440349184/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=796740887007166468Retweeted Brit Hume (@brithume):
There’s wisdom in this. –> https://t.co/E7pKroa835
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-10 10:46:00 UTC