Source: Facebook

  • “the Secret Service (may) investigate all social media postings containing credi

    —“the Secret Service (may) investigate all social media postings containing credible threats, adding that there’s a difference between someone saying they’re planning to kill the president and suggesting that someone else should attempt an assassination. Generally, indirect threats are not prosecuted.”—-

    But the point here is that any attempts to state wishfully that Obama would be assassinated, were held to a different standard by the left than the equivalent wishful thoughts that trump would be assassinated.

    The point here, is not that it’s pretty obvious that democrats are dumber than republicans (which is true). And it’s pretty well documented that democrats practice moral special pleading – they lie. And it’s pretty well documented that the democratic party practices incrementalism and kelptocracy.

    (And it’s pretty well documented that the conservatives are moralizing obstructionists – for good reason.)

    But there is nothing rational, logical, nor moral in progressive speech. It’s just lots of gossip that translates into “I will say or do anything to get what I want and you cant’ believe anything I say or any promise I make.”


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 20:55:00 UTC

  • Male-Female Relationship lessons learned from Ukraine. 1 – Men are barely tamed

    Male-Female Relationship lessons learned from Ukraine.

    1 – Men are barely tamed gorillas. Love them. Feed them. F– them. If necessary dress them.

    2 – Women are incomprehensible. Their job is to love. Love them. Supply them. Make them feel safe.

    3 – No talk of equality or how we should behave. No trying to train or change each other. No criticizing men for gorilla-ing, and no criticizing women for loving.

    Their system is better. No Question. That’s why they’re so poor but still so wonderful. That’s why we’re so broken. We ended the contract between men and women. Men are not women. Women are not men. And any pretense of otherwise is just a lie to perpetuate a fraud, by which to steal, instead of trade.

    That’s what I learned.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 20:10:00 UTC

  • NO. NUMERIC ACCOUNTS DO NOT CONTAIN MONEY (everything you need to know about mon

    NO. NUMERIC ACCOUNTS DO NOT CONTAIN MONEY

    (everything you need to know about money but were too ignorant to ask)

    All credit-money consists entirely of promises – not reserves not assets – just promises. Promises are made using presumptions about the future. If the future that those promises were envisioned in, disappears, then those promises CANNOT be fulfilled. People with ‘accounts’ never had ‘money’ – they had ‘promises of possible money’. All credit money consists of nothing but promises of possible money. period. end of story.

    So when some vast number of promise-money disappears, that means that the possible future disappeared. The money never existed. The money never had the opportunity to exist. The promises cannot be fulfilled.

    This is why the entire economic system is confusing to ordinary people. The only money you have is the money that you could use if the government disappeared tomorrow for good. Everything else is just a stock certificate for an investment in a company that is fully leveraged, and has only a little cash, but can issue new stock certificates at will, diluting the value of each previous stock certificate.

    The US government is a highly leveraged corporation and each dollar bill is a stock certificate, and each dollar of credit money is a promise of future stock certificates if you can fulfill you promises.

    THIS DESCRIBES THE TRUE (SCIENTIFIC) CONTENT OF WHAT YOU CONSIDER MONEY.

    1 – Money-Proper (commodity money).

    2 – Note-Money (notes issued against 100% reserve deposits)

    3 – Fractional-Reserve-Money (notes issued against x% reserve deposits) (promises)

    4 – Credit Money (stock certificates issued against promises of future money) (promises)

    5 – Fiat Money (Stock certificates in the tax returns on a state, as a monopoly, and enforced by law.) (more reliable promises)

    6 – Debt Instruments (too many to list – all sorts of debt) (less reliable promises)

    7 – Debt Default (insurance) Instruments (too many to list) (insurance against failed promises)

    8 – Shares of common stock with mandatory dividends (gambling on performance) (somewhat reliable promises)

    9 – Shares of Common Stock, in public companies (gambling on gullibility of other gamblers). (totally unreliable promises)

    Money is money. Everything else is just a promise. Promises are only as good as the people promising them’s ability to predict the future.

    And we know how good we are at predicting the future: foolishly optimistic.

    The western miracle is largely the result of conquering and selling off the American continent, the benefits of burning off stored petroleum products, and a three thousand five hundred years of evolving the technology we call accounting, empirical science, and the natural common law of contract.

    You are, we are, I am, heavily invested in a highly leveraged corporation under the assumption that we can continue to out-invent competing nations, in the next generation as successfully as we have out-invented them in the past 500 years, since we invented the technology of empiricism, and conquered the American continent.

    The entire ‘progressive’ program hinges on the assumption that we can continue to *invent* marginal differences in technology faster than competitors do – despite the fact that we no longer hold a monopoly on the technology that makes rapid invention possible: accounting, empiricism, and empirical contract law.

    So for example, just as Apple is making almost all its money on an iPhone, but if the iPhone era ends, the apple stock (and income) will crash; we Americans and Europeans, are heavily invested in stock certificates and promises of future stock certificates if we are able to continue to invent new technologies (in all their forms) faster than our competitors who now possess our same technologies.

    This is the basic argument conservatives have been unable to make over the past century. And you (we) were told that the source of our prosperity was democracy. This is false. Democracy is a useful means of distributing the windfall profits from 3500 years of western evolution of the technology of empiricism (truth telling) and the conquest and sale of a continent. We call that the cultural equivalent of winning the lottery. And the American system of government and our entire economy, are based on the likelihood that we will win another lottery. Despite the fact that we have only won three of them in 3500 years:

    1) the combination of wheel, horse, and bronze enabled us to conquer Eurasia, because of the technology of mobility and armor.

    2) the Greek invention of truth, reason, and proto-science combined with the discovery of local silver mines.

    3) the English invention of empiricism and science, combined with the discovery of a continent of primitives.

    That’s it. It’s not more complicated than that.

    Progressives are always wrong. Conservatives are always incompetent at communication. Together it’s been a catastrophe.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 18:17:00 UTC

  • ( Antibiotics, 40mg of Prednisone, three large latte’s. … and who the hell nee

    ( Antibiotics, 40mg of Prednisone, three large latte’s. … and who the hell needs cocaine or speed? omg. I cannot shut my mouth. someone give me a ball gag to shut me up. please. save everyone within 100 yards. i am an verbal threat to myself and civilization…..)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 18:07:00 UTC

  • NO. SCIENCE IS A MORAL DISCIPLINE WITHIN NATURAL LAW: THE MEANS BY WHICH WE WARR

    NO. SCIENCE IS A MORAL DISCIPLINE WITHIN NATURAL LAW: THE MEANS BY WHICH WE WARRANT THE TRUTHFULNESS OF OUR STATEMENTS.

    The languges of science(testimony), physical science, propertarianism (social science), natural law (science of dispute resolution), accounting, finance, and economics, (measurement of production), function as the universal language of truth-telling.

    The discipline of science asks us to warranty that we have performed due diligence on our statements. We warranty that we have eliminated error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, pseudoscience, and deceit from our utterances.

    That’s what science is:

    A NATURAL LAW: a warranty of our information, just like the warranty of our services, just as the warranty of our products, just as the warranty of our speech.

    Period. End of story.

    I know. You thought you were smart. You were so proud that you had transcended superstition. But it never occurred to you that you were just as ridiculous in the present generation due to the pseudosciences of Marx, Freud, Boaz, Adorno than your superstitious ancestors were in the pseudoscience of theology.

    Ok. Have we got that straight? Look in the mirror. Repeat after me: “I was suckered by pseudoscience, just like my ancestors were suckered by superstition. I am a sucker. I pledge not to be a sucker any longer. There is only one moral rule in both silver(negative) and gold (positive) forms: Impose not cost upon the cost born by others, by limiting yourself to actions and words, consisting only of productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, limited to productive externalities.

    Ethelebert (Anglo-Saxon Silver Rule), Jesus (Golden-Rule), and Kant (bi-metal rule), all said the same thing. Everything else is lies to justify theft and to circumvent voluntary transfers between individuals classes and groups.

    Ok. We’re done here.

    “Please stop torturing me with your postmodern superstitions, ok?. Thanks, -The Management.”

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 17:39:00 UTC

  • NO. MORALITY IS AS OBJECTIVE AS THE PHYSICAL SCIENCES (propertarian basics) No,

    NO. MORALITY IS AS OBJECTIVE AS THE PHYSICAL SCIENCES

    (propertarian basics)

    No, moral decidability is perfectly objective. Pseudo-moral norms may or man not be in fact moral. Subjective moral bias, may or may not be in fact moral. But moral rules are not subjective. It’s that your moral intuitions consist of possible truths combined with, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, and outright deceit.

    Morality is a purely scientific discipline. The purpose of the scientific method is to eliminate the various falsehoods from our imaginations and our speech.

    We don’t like that morality is scientific, any more than we liked that science disproved our religious beliefs. But our moral intuitions and our moral beliefs are just as false as our assumptions about the religious statements and pre-scientific era assumptions.

    If you think morality is subjective you are just as ridiculous as flat-earthers, and theological fundamentalists. There isn’t any difference except the excuses that you use. You just use different excuses.

    So deal with it. There is very little difference between your presumption of moral subjectivity and moral dictate. Instead, morality is objectively scientific and we just lie a lot to get away with lots of falsehoods in this era like we did the past eras.

    There is only one silver and one golden rule: Do nothing to impose a cost upon that which others have imposed a cost to create or accumulate. And therefore limit your actions to those that consist entirely of productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfers, limited to productive externalities. The evolutionary function of morality is to aggressively prohibit the free riding in its various forms so that we preserve the incentive to cooperate, because with the expense of the human life form, it is only through cooperation in the production of calories in all their forms, that we defeat the dark forces of entropy, time, and ignorance.

    That’s it. Morality is as scientific as are the physical sciences with the only difference being that because we possess memories, we are able to borrow and lend cooperative efforts across time. We have the ability to ‘calculate’ using memory by means that the universe cannot.

    But otherwise we are not different from any other form of organized matter in the universe: we are bound by the physical rules of it. And those that disobey those rules are extinct, or out gunned, germ-ed, steel-ed, norm-ed, and institution-ed, cultured, and genetic-ed, by those what obey them more closely.

    Period. End of argument. Social Science is SOLVED.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 17:10:00 UTC

  • Propertarianism is as important an innovation over empiricism as empiricism was

    Propertarianism is as important an innovation over empiricism as empiricism was over rationalism, and rationalism over reason. (Really)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 12:11:00 UTC

  • Can we shut down economics departments? No. We can however forbid the publicatio

    Can we shut down economics departments? No. We can however forbid the publication of pseudoscience: involuntary transfers.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 12:10:00 UTC

  • The purpose of economics is to justify theft, and produce disincentives for mora

    The purpose of economics is to justify theft, and produce disincentives for moral policy and action. The cult of immorality for 100 years.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 12:05:00 UTC

  • Secret: There is no value in economics in social policy – at all. The only reaso

    Secret: There is no value in economics in social policy – at all. The only reason we use economics is because we failed to solve social sci.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 12:04:00 UTC