Source: Facebook

  • (I always want to call bullshit on my family’s history because I am just so susp

    (I always want to call bullshit on my family’s history because I am just so suspicious of victorian pretense. but in 1250 it’s still Johannes De Duletel. And the recorded origins of Kidderminster just match. I am more inclined to believe the name is adopted. But there is no way to tell from whom. In other words, there are no land holders with similar names for them to have been workers for. So i am left with the most logical option that the conquest was not a success for ‘the fam’ and that between 1100 and 1250 they were relegated to small land holders. Or, I can go with the pessimistic theory and say that it’s just as likely that the lands were awarded in the north to the de dolietta’s. Family worked for them. the line ended. the family kept the name, moved south and settled in the Worcestershire area, then kidderminster. (some suggestive evidence of this). The thing is that they were literate as far back as we have records. So that’s the problem. It’s too believable that they fell from grace so to speak. And with the name and line consistent from 1250 to the present in that same area it just seems more believable to me that (as they seem to have been in france) they were ‘problematic’ and couldn’t hold territory. Puritans were lunatics. Really. I mean, you should read some of the stuff my ancestors wrote. It’s … worse than my own. lol)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 23:27:00 UTC

  • THE ‘TALK’: WHY ARE WE STOOPING TO THE LEFT’S LEVEL In person i am a gentleman.

    THE ‘TALK’: WHY ARE WE STOOPING TO THE LEFT’S LEVEL

    In person i am a gentleman. but i learned a lot from Hayek’s pristine, gentlemanly, german failure with Keynes: never give the enemy an inch out of grace.

    we aren’t Victorians. this is a street fight. a brawl. and i use broken bottles, brass knuckles, clubs, knives, guns, and every other weapon I can get my hands on. And so do all of us in the various New Right groups.

    When the left, via Alinsky, took the battle to the streets, they broke with our ancient european tradition and adopted the techniques of the peasantry.

    that’s’ all well and good for them – until they realized in this election that we gave up on our Victorianism and stooped to their level.

    And the alt right beat them to a bloody pulp at their own game.

    Now I am in the process of eviscerating every bit of leftist pseudoscience written in the past 150 years. It will take me a while to build the 100 or so people that can construct propertarian arguments but at that point we are the equivalent of the anti-frankfurt school.

    And so forgive me if I frequently digress from stoic analytic purity and go slumming, seeking street fights with the left’s kleptocracy of deceit.

    But I’m looking for skulls to drink from.

    You, the left, thought you were winning rather than that we were just biding our time, hoping you would learn. Sorry. You didn’t learn. We are failed parents and you’re the family black sheep. You’re the alcoholic, the drug user, the impulsive criminal, and the sociopath. and the social-climbing daughter. That’s all. A cult of kleptocracy.

    So, We don’t want your consent, your agreement, your approval, or your opinion. We want your silence, submission, punishment, eviction, or death. Which of those we levy against you dependent upon your choice of silence, departure, or death.

    You cannot meet us on the field of truth.

    You cannot meet us on the field of propaganda.

    You cannot meet us on the field of war.

    You can only meet us in the market of voluntary exchanges. Because that is the only field we will leave you.

    So we have a message for you: productive, fully informed, voluntary exchange between the classes or it is easier, and cheaper to return you to servitude, serfdom or slavery.

    You are weaker. You will always be weaker.

    And we know this. And so do you.

    You’re done. There won’t be another election for you to win.

    Because you taught us that you are not ready for adulthood, nor liberty, nor peerage.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 23:06:00 UTC

  • “So, the invention of the concept of empirical truth gives our culture a faster

    —“So, the invention of the concept of empirical truth gives our culture a faster OODA loop?”— J.H. (An interesting analogy, but yes.)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 22:41:00 UTC

  • LAWS ARE DISCOVERED, LEGISLATION IS MADE. MAN CANNOT MAKE LAW. Humans create com

    LAWS ARE DISCOVERED, LEGISLATION IS MADE. MAN CANNOT MAKE LAW.

    Humans create commands, legislation, and regulations. Laws, both physical and natural (cooperation), we can only discover. We cannot any more create a law of cooperation (natural law) than we can a law of nature (physical laws). The only difference between physical laws and natural laws is that since we have memories, we can cooperate across time rather than be limited to the moment of the difference in potential.

    (That might be hard to catch without pondering a bit.)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 22:38:00 UTC

  • It’s not that economics isn’t empirical.It’s that its largely immoral.But scienc

    It’s not that economics isn’t empirical.It’s that its largely immoral.But science is a moral discipline.So if it’s immoral is it scientific?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 21:59:00 UTC

  • “Anyone who confuses you with a white supremacist is just too low IQ to read wha

    —“Anyone who confuses you with a white supremacist is just too low IQ to read what you write about.”—Murray Sell


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 21:56:00 UTC

  • Well, you know, most of what I say is just common sense. The difference is that

    Well, you know, most of what I say is just common sense. The difference is that now we have a century of evidence of democracy to prove it.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 21:51:00 UTC

  • (just a reminder. i am not a racist although i am definitely a classist. i am no

    (just a reminder. i am not a racist although i am definitely a classist. i am not white supremacist. my position is that we white people discovered a revolutionary technology (what we call empirical truth) that when combined with sovereignty, allowed us to ‘calculate’ adaptation faster than all other forms of social order. And that we used this technology to conquer and domesticate humans for fun and profit. And that all people, in all tribes, and all races, should love and advance their kin. i do not want to be bucketed with the racists. i do not want to be bucketed with the white supremacists. i consider myself a social scientist who uses the historical structure of philosophy to write in the only language of social science: natural law. i am happy to commiserate with my fellows. and i love my people above all others. but the fact of the matter is – and I know this infuriates the racists and supremacists – that i am happy if you can use my work for nationalist purposes. and i hope that all people from all races and nations and tribes use my work. but “I got no hate” for anyone except maybe my ex-wife’s lawyer and one particularly smarmy venture capitalist. so if you can use my stuff that’s great. but if you want me to legitimize bitching about others instead of defending yourselves, i’m just not going to do it. i have just as much interest in aristocracy for every other tribe as I do for my own. let a thousand nations bloom. let’s transcend the beast man and reach for the stars.)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 21:48:00 UTC

  • “Right wingers don’t have riots. They have coups.”—Murray Sell

    —“Right wingers don’t have riots. They have coups.”—Murray Sell


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 21:27:00 UTC

  • ( well, i gotta say, that I haven’t been able to breathe for as long as I rememb

    ( well, i gotta say, that I haven’t been able to breathe for as long as I remember. and whatever they’re giving me is amazing. even if it makes me even crazier than usual. )


    Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 21:02:00 UTC