I have to understand a thing to state it both passionately and truthfully. History is already full of many people who state opinions passionately as a substitute for stating them truthfully. I don’t need to add to their number, but end the growth of their number.
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-23 13:28:00 UTC
( I didn’t swear at ALL until I moved from rural western new york to connecticut. farmers vs wage laborers. negative indoctrination. lol )
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-23 12:34:00 UTC
(tech whining)(lol)
Why are people so proud of functional programming? I mean, back when we wrote all this shit in ASSEMBLY LANGUAGE and FORTRAN, how the hell do you think we were doing it?
Sorry guys but I freaking LOVE self documenting compartmentalized code. All I want is exceptional garbage collection including zeroing memory, so that mere humans don’t need to manage memory. I love softly typed languages. I love WORDY languages. I love OBJECT ORIENTED languages. Because I get PAID for writing SOFTWARE and PAID for fixing your fucking shit code. OK?
Now here I am working with the ‘newest generation’ of JS, and you know it fucking feels like 1978 all over again.
The problem is the rate of evolution of the language and the browser.
There is zero reason we don’t just define ‘stores’ (models, data-models) and point divs at stores, except that the damned browser consortium is now a the technological equivalent of a socialist government: impeding rates of development in order to satisfy the needs of major company bureaucracies.
Fork Chrome and do it right. I don’t have the Time or Money for another fucking project. But you know how many BILLIONS we are wasting by letting MSFT/GOOGLE/APPLE externalize the cost of their Rent Seeking by Network Effect?
This is why we have to teach economics in high school: so that people get pissed off at the right things, rather than this stupid leftist horse-shit.
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-23 12:12:00 UTC
Markets require information and exchange.
Those who will trade are cheaper to profit from than those you must manage. animal -> slave -> serf -> freemen -> citizen -> sovereign.
We want a lot of sovereigns of course, but citizens are cheaper than freemen, are cheaper than serfs, are cheaper than slaves, are cheaper than animals.
Under natural law dissent, rather than majoritarian assent, they’re powerless unless we want something from them. So it’s simply cheaper.
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-23 11:59:00 UTC
Life Lesson: Don’t get in the way of women doing their work.
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-23 11:53:00 UTC
THE WEST’S GROUP EVOLUTIONARY STRATEGY
1 – SOVEREIGNTY (CONTRACTUALISM), REQUIRES ->
2 – MILITIA (PAY TO PLAY), REQUIRES ->
3 – TRUST, REQUIRES ->
4 – TRUTH WHICH PERMITS ->
5 – DOMESTICATING ANIMAL MAN FOR FUN AND PROFIT. WHICH CAUSES ->
7 – TRANSCENDENCE (EUGENIC EVOLUTION VIA PEDOMORPHISM), WHICH RESULTS IN ->
8 – EVER INCREASING RATES OF ADAPTATION (INNOVATION AND WEALTH)
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-23 11:48:00 UTC
TRUTH GIVES YOU, AND US, POWER
(interesting)
It’s not that I don’t make mistakes. I do. Often. Or that I’m all that arrogant (other than when it suits marketing purposes). It’s that it’s simply very, very, very, hard to use testimonialism and propertarianism and not become aware of your errors, biases, wishful thinking, attempts at suggestion, obscurantism, overloading, and deceit. It allows you to dramatically increase the ratio of true and false propositions.
There is no substitute however for the market for criticism by equally testimonial means. One simply cannot think of everything on one’s own.
So I find most of my errors are errors of interpretation of others, or of historical facts that I use as illustrations and examples. These are errors of meaning, not errors of construction.
But even in construction, when we are subjectively testing the incentives that cause the decisions of others, we can be easily ignorant of the factors involved (inputs) that the individual is weighing. it is very easy to judge one’s misrepresentation of those weights, but if we are not aware of them we cannot subjectively test (judge) them.
This is why discourse, jury, and market are so effective in improving our polities, commons, products, services, and information **IF** they consist of testimonial language and warranty (truth) … and why they are so destructive in its absence: because self correction is not only difficult but increasingly impossible. And manipulation by others is so trivially easy.
The most expensive commons we have built in the west is truth telling (testimony), in an effort to maintain the high trust (militia) polity. A Sovereignty requires Militia, Militia requires trust, trust requires truth, and truth produces all the amazing consequences we attribute to western civlization: under economic adversity we innovate faster than the rest.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine.
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-23 11:46:00 UTC
If you’re selfish, stupid, and ugly, you’re undesirable for cooperation, association, reproduction, and employment. I realize this frustrates the female intuition. Because just as a gay man desires the attention we give to females and is ‘hurt’ by its absence – because men are disposable, and their sexual attention unwanted – an undesirable woman feels the same ‘hurt’.
But because of the reproductive necessity of feminine solipsism, these women lack agency: they are unable to distinguish between, or unable to tolerate, their undesirability and need for self-reformation, from active hostility toward them. Absence of attention is not the same as the presence of malice. Instead, the fact is, that if you are impulsive, selfish, stupid, and ugly, you’re just a dead weight cost on the rest of humanity. And no one pays you any attention until you change yourself.
(The more I understand the differences in male and female agency the more disappointed I become with the prospects. men evolved greater agency because we’re dangerous to one another if we can’t develop it. Women’s lack of agency was tolerable before politics and nearly disappeared when they had multiple children. In that sense women’s lack of agency is an evolutionary asset for women with three or more children, and a detriment without them.)
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-23 10:05:00 UTC
WHAT’S “FAIR”?
Q&A: What is ‘fair’ or ‘unfair’? — Jason Cockrell
Fair (moral): reciprocity. meaning actions limited to (a) productive, (b) fully informed, (c) warrantied, (d) voluntary transfers, (e) limited to productive externalities.
This prohibits profiting from another’s loss, and the construction of hazards: parasitism.
It’s an easier comparison when we think of adult vs child (asymmetry of knowledge and understanding). We tend to be more ‘ok’ with fucking over other adults. We are not ‘ok’ with fucking over children.
But this is because we falsely consider other adults ‘equal’ or ‘peers’ under christianity and the enlightenment. When in fact, the adult-child disparity in knowledge and understanding increases rapidly in a division of knowledge, and labor.
I was taught ‘noblesse oblige’ which is that we don’t take advantage of the lower classes, but we hold those above us to the same standard we hold ourselves to in relation to those below us.
Judgement flows downhill, and so does forgiveness. The ignorant cannot judge and since they cannot judge they cannot forgive.
Hence the value of christianity in creating divisions of knowledge and labor.
Christianity + Aristocracy is a good combination. Forgive because you cannot judge, and take responsibility, because you can judge.
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-23 09:56:00 UTC
Sheriff A E S T H E T I C
“Well you may throw your rock and hide your hand
Workin’ in the dark against your fellow man
But as sure as God made black and white
What’s down in the dark will be brought to the light”
Source date (UTC): 2017-01-23 04:55:00 UTC