Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • DECREASE THE COST OF OPERATIONAL LANGUAGE BY INCREASING YOUR USE OF SPECTRA INST

    DECREASE THE COST OF OPERATIONAL LANGUAGE BY INCREASING YOUR USE OF SPECTRA INSTEAD OF ABSTRACTIONS.

    Operational language is extremely tedious both intellectually in the effort it takes to construct it, and in verbosity, in the number of words required to state it.

    But the principle means of simplifying operational language is to speak in spectra, where the relationship between the different terms is far more informative, and far less open to misinterpretation and misuse, than any other method of expression we are capable of.

    So learn to speak in spectra. There are not so many candidates as you would assume. As a rule of thumb if you can organize three you have constructed a candidate, and if you can organize six you have likely constructed a proof.

    And as a consequence, you will make obvious that the relationship between monopoly concepts (ideal types), the desire for monopoly opinions, and the desire for monopoly governments, is caused by the same cognitive bias: the cost in complexity of comparing each additional dimension we must contribute to any comparison, and the inability of most people to construct and use such comparisons.

    In fact, this is possibly the most useful test of intelligence: how many causal axis can you compare? I suspect that this is as accurate a description of the ‘every ten points’ of intelligence rule, as is the method of learning.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-31 09:13:00 UTC

  • “You can turn the other cheek, but only to lure your enemy in and destroy them”-

    —“You can turn the other cheek, but only to lure your enemy in and destroy them”—Karl Grohe

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-31 09:01:00 UTC

  • SORRY. I KILLED ANARCHISM (DENIAL OF REALITY), AND POSSIBLY LIBERTY (BEGGING FOR

    SORRY. I KILLED ANARCHISM (DENIAL OF REALITY), AND POSSIBLY LIBERTY (BEGGING FOR PRETENSE OF SOVEREIGNTY).

    (and I love taunting the faithful with such statements)

    —“Are you an anarchist or not? There is only one social law and it is absolute, axiomatic, eternal, objective, and universal natural law- the law of private property.”— Chris Anpropian

    That is an interesting statement. But until you define the scope of private property it’s actually non-rational (untestable) one: a logical deception demanding the use of substitution for an undefined (property) term.

    If you define the scope of property using rothbardian ghetto ethics, you will be unable to use praxeological reasoning to construct an explanation of the incentives under which such a polity can form and persist. If you define it as Hoppian ethics, you will not be able to construct an explanation of the incentive of how a polity can form and persist in competition with other polities. if you rely on property in toto (demonstrated property), you will be able to construct a polity that can form, survive, and compete.

    There is a reason why the american west was a province of the american empire, a reason why eastern europe hosted jews as polish, lithuanian, and russian provices, a reason the german princedom’s existed under french and italian papacy as provinces, a reason why the icelandic experiments existed as danish provinces, a reason why greek settlements existed as greek provinces, and so on: to hold (squat) territory at low cost on behalf of an empire that could afford to defend but not afford to administrate it.

    There exists one objective law of voluntary cooperation: full reciprocity: the non imposition of costs against the costs born by another without having imposed costs against the costs born by another and so on – leaving only productive, fully in formed, warrantied, voluntary exchange, limited to productive externalities as the possible means survival. In other words: markets in everything: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, production of commons, production of polities, production of group competition against other polities.

    One does not create excuses why another will not retaliate. Others will not retaliate against productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchanges, limited to productive externalities. That would be irrational, and man is neither moral or immoral, but merely rational in the pursuit of his reproductive, and therefore cooperative, strategy.

    quod erat demonstrandum.

    I killed jewish and german anarchism and left the fully reciprocal natural law of sovereign men as the only possible means of obtaining a condition of sovereignty in fact, liberty by permission, freedom by utility, and subsidy as insurance.

    There has only ever been one source of sovereignty: the organized use of violence to create a condition of perfect reciprocity by the total suppression of parasitism.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Law of Nature and of Men.

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-31 09:00:00 UTC

  • Rothbard (jewish pilpul – ghetto ethics) > Hoppe (german justificationary ration

    Rothbard (jewish pilpul – ghetto ethics) > Hoppe (german justificationary rationalism – tribal ethics ) > Doolittle (anglo science of law – national ethics)

    Took three generations, but we finally got it right. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-31 08:25:00 UTC

  • THE FOLLY OF EUROPEANS – THE SPREAD OF SUICIDAL GERMANISM ( Only privileged euro

    THE FOLLY OF EUROPEANS – THE SPREAD OF SUICIDAL GERMANISM

    ( Only privileged europeans argue moral equivalency where no equivalency exists. There is a very good reason northern europeans evolved a the world’s fastest innovation, greatest wealthy, highest trust society, practicing deflationary truth, deflationary classes, deflationary disciplines, deflationary (independent) institutions, with common natural empirical law, absolute nuclear families, markets for association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, and polities, rather than the opposite of each of those that are practiced universally – everywhere else in the world and in history. We have the evidence: we have literally eliminated our underclasses by incrementally aggressive means for 3500 years. And this is the dirty secret of the Human Genome Project: (a) there are differences between geographic groups, ethnic groups, difference between classes, and genders, (b) that these differences are the product of self selection not random mutation, leaving all europeans significantly more ‘domesticated’, homogenous, and pedomorphically evolved than other groups except the Han, Koreans, and Japanese (who practice particularism and willingly pay the economic cost of it), and (c) that the current era’s wealth has temporarily made these differences less material than in the past. But (d) as the current economies are demonstrating, that temporary wealth advantage was was created by europeans over centuries and is now dissipating as the technologies are distributing worldwide and eliminating that advantage. Europeans are still faith-based. In fact, as the evidence mounts, it turns out that most of the ‘bad ideas’ that have led to the end of the west are or german origin and have spread to the other european countries by their influence. That influence originated in the kantian preservation of faith by secular rationalist means. Continental philosophy is suicidal. Always has been. And this is why europeans are suicidal: faith in the empirically false assertion that we are any different from the genetic mechanizations of any other domesticated animals. We aren’t. Breeds matter. And we are the golden retrievers of the human breeds. And that’s a bad thing. )

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-31 07:56:00 UTC

  • Eli Harman’s Theorem (worth repeating … often ) —“If you would be SOVEREIGN,

    Eli Harman’s Theorem

    (worth repeating … often )

    —“If you would be SOVEREIGN, you must fight. If you would win, you must confederate. If you would confederate, you must compromise. If you would compromise, you must accept limits on your actions. SOVEREIGNTY will be won only by those who desire to exercise it within limits considered reasonable by their peers.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-31 06:51:00 UTC

  • *Never turn the other cheek

    *Never turn the other cheek.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-31 06:45:00 UTC

  • Dude, I just caught this and thought of you. No idea why…;)

    Dude, I just caught this and thought of you. No idea why…;)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-31 06:10:00 UTC

  • THE DIFFICULT TRUTH: IF YOU DON’T LIKE THE DEMOGRAPHIC WINTER, EMBACE THE COMING

    THE DIFFICULT TRUTH: IF YOU DON’T LIKE THE DEMOGRAPHIC WINTER, EMBACE THE COMING PURGE.

    by a friend.

    —“OK, heres some painful and difficult truth. These are words that can’t be spoken publicly, yet. We have let our nations get out of hand. We have squandered our options. The infection has spread too far.

    We are past the point where this can be solved solely with preventative measures. We are going to need more drastic action.

    You can’t be scared or angry about a new civil war coming AND be worried about demographic winter. Look to history, there is no way that us K selected people will out breed the r(at)s. There is a reason we have evolved into the worlds greatest killing machines, its a major part of our survival strategy. Traditionally, we don’t win by out breeding them, we win by out killing them. Any time we tried the r approach we have lost, its not our forte.

    We haven’t exercised our option for violence until now because we have been patient. We allowed our governments to try an experiment that we deep down knew would fail. Now that the failure is fully obvious and blow back has the potential to kill us all and destroy our civilisations, we need to revoke our authorisation.

    Its over. Its not going to work. We are done trying. The next step is cleaning up the mess. Fortunately, the out group is giving us the moral high ground to eliminate them without it keeping us up at night.

    If you don’t like the demographic winter, embrace the coming purge.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-31 06:07:00 UTC

  • BETWEEN HONESTY TRUTHFULNESS AND TRUTH. i can knowingly speak deceitfully withou

    BETWEEN HONESTY TRUTHFULNESS AND TRUTH.

    i can knowingly speak deceitfully without honesty.

    i can knowingly speak honestly, without due diligence.

    i can knowingly speak truthfully, with due diligence.

    i cannot knowingly speak the Truth, only strive to.

    i can knowingly speak a tautology,

    I can knowingly construct a proof of existential possibility.

    The Truth exists in the most parsimonious description man can utter. That description is a thing’s true name. It’s name consists of the operations of its construction – its causes. And only those causes – nothing more.

    Therefore to speak ‘The Truth’ consists of speaking a thing’s true name.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-31 00:27:00 UTC