Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • “I find it fascinating to watch the left, in seemingly hypnotic trance, by their

    —“I find it fascinating to watch the left, in seemingly hypnotic trance, by their very acts, create the very thing they claim to despise.”–Moritz Bierling

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-01 15:22:00 UTC

  • (sick as a dog today)

    (sick as a dog today)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-01 15:21:00 UTC

  • (dammnit Ricky Saini, that book is freaking awesome! he gives us a wonderful lan

    (dammnit Ricky Saini, that book is freaking awesome! he gives us a wonderful language for describing the initial analytic(existential unloaded ), allegorical (imaginary and loaded) break with the past. So, as an oversimplifitation we can divide intellectual history between aristotile, plato/precursors, literature, poets, and mystics, prophets, augustine/abraham, in this sort of absurd historical circle.)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-01 15:21:00 UTC

  • SERIES: Hierarchy of sympathies: 1 – condition (empathy – condition sympathy) “i

    SERIES:

    Hierarchy of sympathies:

    1 – condition (empathy – condition sympathy) “i can sense/experience your feelings”

    … 2 – imitation (action sympathy)

    … … 3 – intention ( intention sympathy)

    THE LESSON; Whenever you use a term:

    (a) can you place it in a series, so that you know you aren’t conflating?

    (b) can you narrate how the state you’re describing or naming came into existence? Or are you conflating imagination (fantasy) with possibility(existence).

    (c) are the references to all your terms consistent in existential grammar? Meaning: are they all in operational language, and if not, are they in observational, are if not are they in experiential, and if not, are they in intentional? How do you know you aren’t conflating forms of existence?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-01 15:15:00 UTC

  • “Hitler” – providing generations of morons the only two syllables needed to desc

    —“Hitler” – providing generations of morons the only two syllables needed to describe everything they’ve been convinced they must oppose.— Nick Heywood

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-01 15:07:00 UTC

  • The difference between Legal argument and Propertarian (Natural Law) argument, i

    The difference between Legal argument and Propertarian (Natural Law) argument, is that we don’t have to make excuses for ‘rule’ (commands), legislation(commands), and regulation(commands), just whether a disagreement is true and moral – meaning perfectly reciprocal.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-01 13:30:00 UTC

  • SOVEREIGNTY = perfect (exceptionless) reciprocity by perfect (exceptionless) rec

    SOVEREIGNTY = perfect (exceptionless) reciprocity by perfect (exceptionless) reciprocal insurance, in numbers sufficient to deny violations of reciprocity to all possible (exeptionless) extant numbers.

    PERFECT RECIPROCITY = limiting one’s actions to productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer of property – in – toto, limited to productive externalities.

    PROPERTY IN TOTO = That in which one has expended any resource with intent to obtain an interest, without imposing a cost on that which another has expended a resource with the intent to obtain an interest. Synonym: ‘demonstrated property’

    INTEREST: = ergo, leaving only homesteading, transformation, and exchange, as means of obtaining an interest. Synonym: monopoly share (a possession), proportional share (citizenship in a commons), proportional share (private in a common contract), demonstrated share ( a denial of opportunity( such as norms and traditions)

    RESOURCE : life, body, effort, time, attention, kin, material possession, material interest (share), organizational interest, normative interest, institutional interest, informational interest. Synonym: “capital”.

    YIELDS:

    Possession(insured by self defense) > consensual property (insured by reciprocity) > normative property(insured by normative enforcement) > property right (insured by third party enforcement) > natural right(ideal between government and citizens) or human right(ideal between governments). Technically speaking,under rule of law, under natural judge-discovered common law, under perfect reciprocity (sovereignty), natural rights can be brought into existence.

    Under these conditions it is possible to create sovereignty in fact, liberty by permission, freedom by utility, and subsidy by preference.

    (Good luck getting that degree of precision out of parasitic libertines) 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-01 11:27:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-31 18:55:00 UTC

  • “Christ has displaced Isis in the affections of the female line, and it was thro

    —“Christ has displaced Isis in the affections of the female line, and it was through the women of the family that christianity was triumphing.”—

    Women are the vector for suicide. And men and our lines pay the price.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-31 18:53:00 UTC

  • Trey Martin Thanks for the fun today. And thanks for stickin’ up for me. 😉 I ho

    Trey Martin Thanks for the fun today. And thanks for stickin’ up for me. 😉 I hope i didn’t hurt any of the little bunnies.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-01-31 18:17:00 UTC