Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • PLEASE DEFINE “COMMONS”— COMMONS – Originally, meaning Land or resources belon

    https://propertarianism.com/2015/07/27/a-short-course-in-propertarian-morality-2/—“CURT: PLEASE DEFINE “COMMONS”—

    COMMONS – Originally, meaning Land or resources belonging to or affecting the whole of a community. More articulately: any form of property to which members of a group share an interests, because of bearing a cost to obtain that interest, but where that interest is obtained by an unspecified membership in the group rather than by explicit possession of title. I use this term to refer to both physical commons, normative commons, institutional commons, and informational commons. The problem we face with commons is that without explicitly issued shares, even un-tradable shares, the ownership of the commons cannot be protected from confiscation by various means including immigration, or political confiscation.

    See Also

    DEMONSTRATED PROPERTY RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS

    https://propertarianism.com/2015/07/27/property-rights-and-obligations/

    A SHORT COURSE IN PROPERTARIAN MORALITY

    https://propertarianism.com/2015/07/27/a-short-course-in-propertarian-morality-2/

    A SHORT COURSE IN PROPERTARIAN REASONING

    https://propertarianism.com/2015/09/26/a-short-course-in-propertarian-reasoning/

    (Honestly people, the accusation that this isn’t accessible is simply untrue. It isn’t in COURSE form, but all the insights are there to consume as fairly simple series (lists). The ‘book’ is up there. The courses are not. )

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-25 21:40:00 UTC

  • Never try to outlast a russian. Never try to out fight a german Never try to out

    Never try to outlast a russian.

    Never try to out fight a german

    Never try to out maneuver an american.

    heh. not sure why that seems so funny.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-25 21:23:00 UTC

  • Honestly, other than rendering video or some other horribly mathematically inten

    Honestly, other than rendering video or some other horribly mathematically intense process of recursive iterations, I can’t see the need for a personal computer much more powerful than the one I have without the addition of a dramatically more powerful application to run on it. The most demanding applications we have are 3dGraphics and we offload computation of the poly’s and the rendering of the layers we apply to them to an external processor. I mean, General Intelligence AI’s are gonna be ‘hurtfully’ expensive. But I am pretty sure they will run off shared data stores. The primary problem we still face is pretty boring: bandwidth not processors

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-25 21:17:00 UTC

  • ( Been sick since I think Sunday? Couldn’t code much this week. Funny that I can

    ( Been sick since I think Sunday? Couldn’t code much this week. Funny that I can still write a bit but I can’t code. Back to work tomorrow I hope. Because I can ALMOST think in code tonight)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-25 20:20:00 UTC

  • Our rulers are not the upper classes, they are elites. There is a very big diffe

    Our rulers are not the upper classes, they are elites. There is a very big difference between upper class (economic), elite(priestly), and aristocracy(military).

    I am the lowest of aristocracy first and always first.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-25 20:18:00 UTC

  • TERMS: FULL ACCOUNTING VS FULL VS PERFECT RECIPROCITY —“Describe what you mean

    TERMS: FULL ACCOUNTING VS FULL VS PERFECT RECIPROCITY

    —“Describe what you mean by “FULL reciprocity” if you would.”—

    “Without having to make an excuse for an involuntary imposition of costs in either direction” , I sometimes use the term ‘perfect reciprocity’ which is technically impossible,but is less confusing. The possible term is full accounting (what is possible), not ideal accounting(what is perfect).

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-25 19:28:00 UTC

  • The beneficial consequence of manorialism and the family farm under manorialism,

    The beneficial consequence of manorialism and the family farm under manorialism, is that not only did it eugenically suppress the underclasses, but it prohibited the concentration of wealth and power that was available to the river valley civilizations.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-25 19:04:00 UTC

  • Ethical differences run in families because of the crop they raised in the agrar

    Ethical differences run in families because of the crop they raised in the agrarian era. These crops forced different selection pressures, which produced families with both traditional and genetic biases.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-25 19:01:00 UTC

  • Entrepreneurship runs in families for many reasons but not the least of which is

    Entrepreneurship runs in families for many reasons but not the least of which is because the lower classes make moral judgements (claims on others) and the middle classes make reciprocity judgements (exchanges with others) and the upper middle classes make outwitting judgements (competing with others).

    We train generations in the assumption of the nature of relations which imprisons them.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-25 19:00:00 UTC

  • “I think that communistic countries [ like mine ], heavily relied on memorizatio

    —“I think that communistic countries [ like mine ], heavily relied on memorization in schools as an mark of excellence. That really annoyed me. I couldn’t touch that stuff, but loved how American universities handled the issue. So, when I read your stuff, I could see that math primarily “start-up-ed” to count money (accounting and economics). But nobody in communistic countries wants you to think about money, better leave that to the government.”— A Friend

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-25 18:16:00 UTC