Revolutions cause great emigrations.
They increase homogeneity
(that’s a good thing)
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-26 04:57:00 UTC
Revolutions cause great emigrations.
They increase homogeneity
(that’s a good thing)
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-26 04:57:00 UTC
PLEASE WATCH EMMANUEL TODD
ON THE FUTURE OF EUROPE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yz4zUGlhK8
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-26 04:27:00 UTC
russians punch you in the face for being an asshole. i love them.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-25 23:55:00 UTC
We freaking did it.
Agency, Sovereignty, Oath, Reciprocity, Testimony, Markets in Everything, The Domestication of Man into AGENCY for fun and profit.
Acquisitionism, Testimonialism, Propertarianism, Natural Law, Markets in Everything – group evolutionary strategy of the peerage.
The people who speak deflationary truth
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-25 23:11:00 UTC
I got very angry by red pilling myself over libertarianism, once I realized what Rothbard had done. At this point I’m mostly over it. But for the past few year’s I’ve been vengeful.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-25 23:07:00 UTC
WOMEN AND GENGHIS KHAN
We do not stop Genghis Khan from his parasitism by moral demand, but by eliminating his ability to conduct parasitism. We do not stop women from their natural preening, consumption, nesting, parasitism, currying favor and status through redistribution, and undermining the power structure by engaging them in moral argument. They lack the agency to do so.
You simply create institutions that prohibit them from parasitism, currying favor and status through redistribution and undermining the power structure.
You deny people opportunity for rational parasitism, you don’t convince them not to engage in it.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-25 22:08:00 UTC
WOMEN AND THE FRANCHISE
I take the opposite position: that we have merely given women the proxy of violence that we call government without providing the same disincentives to abusing it as women do, that we have created for men over thousands of years, as men do. Women do damage via different means than do men. Yet we did not limit their ability to do damage. So we can say our experiment in enfranchisement has failed, or we can improve our institutions such that the even more destructive intuitions of women cannot be let loose by the violence of government under the franchise.
(Eli has me thinking about solutions rather than criticisms)
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-25 22:02:00 UTC
PROPERTARIANISM: DataTypes, Operations, Grammar, Syntax
Think of Propertarianism as a programming language consisting of data types, operations, grammar, and syntax.
if you can ‘write a program’ that ‘computes’ (is operationally constructable’) with those data types, operations, grammar, and syntax, then you can write a formal description of any phenomenon open to human experience in the language of natural law.
You cannot do math without understanding it, and you can’t write software without understanding it, and you can’t write natural law without understanding it.
I mean… you’d honestly have to be a simpleton to think that you’re going to learn this FAST. you’ll learn it as fast as you could learn to program. If you can program you can simply do it faster because you’ve learned VERY SIMPLE VERSIONS of the form of operational logic of transformations that exist in propertarianism: Natural Law
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-25 21:58:00 UTC
Honestly people, the accusation that Propertarianism isn’t accessible is simply untrue. It isn’t in COURSE form, but all the insights are there to consume as fairly simple series (lists). The ‘book’ is up there. The courses are not.
If you want ‘in early’ you can do it. I’ve laid it all out for you.
otherwise when I get the courses done you’ll know it.
Look at what we did in the thread on “line” the past few days.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-25 21:52:00 UTC
Women are freaking awesome. I can’t happily live without them.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-25 21:50:00 UTC