Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • CRITICAL THEORY IS A CRITICISM WITHOUT A SOLUTION – THE INDUSTRIALIZATION OF STR

    CRITICAL THEORY IS A CRITICISM WITHOUT A SOLUTION – THE INDUSTRIALIZATION OF STRAW MAN ARGUMENTS

    —“Critical theory is no ideology by itself, it’s just a method to destroy value systems. It doesn’t really replace those values. Cultural Marxism is the girlfriend who always whines; if you ignore her everything is fine, otherwise she will leave you after some time.”—Daniel —“Critical theory is no ideology by itself, it’s just a method to destroy value systems. It doesn’t really replace those values. Cultural Marxism is the girlfriend who always whines; if you ignore her everything is fine, otherwise she will leave you after some time.”—Daniel Daniel SeisSeis

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 05:19:00 UTC

  • FOR NEWCOMERS I understand the frustration with the inaccessibility of Propertar

    FOR NEWCOMERS

    I understand the frustration with the inaccessibility of Propertarianism (Natural Law) in its CURRENT FORM.

    I am leading in the way we need leading. I am providing the anti-marx (anti-abrahamism, anti platonism), and the ‘bible’ of western civilization- law beyond which no man or government may tread without suffering the pain of death.

    Is it not a lot to ask of a man, alone, to be aristotle and alexander in the same flesh? I’m only human. And a bit of a hobbit at that.

    If need be I’ll change uniforms, but at present, in my state of mind, I am doing what my people need most: creating their ‘book’.

    I’ll create the book(bible), the judges(priests), and the school (discipline of natural law).

    I would very much prefer someone else be alexander to my aristotle.

    Why? As you age your understanding of war increases, but your physical and mental energy for it declines. I can write for another twenty years. I can fight for another five.

    But time will take me. I can feel it. And it will take a generation or two to repair the damage of four.

    Affections

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 05:14:00 UTC

  • THE ORIGINS OF CURTPOSTING (Why is Curtposting Funny?) Curtposting: the aestheti

    THE ORIGINS OF CURTPOSTING

    (Why is Curtposting Funny?)

    Curtposting: the aesthetics of order.

    I learned the technique from (a) Karl Popper(tables), and (b) Gary Stanley Becker (Equilibria), and (c) I added programming (operations) – to complete the set of dimensions necessary to describe reality. My original goal was to produce Becker’s degree of parsimony.

    When I was in college I did a series of paintings of mathematical formulae and geometric proofs. I took off on Rothko’s colors, and did proofs over the top of them, arguing that this was beautiful as well – and they were, and are.

    Reality consists of only so many actionable and comprehensible dimensions

    A point, a noun, a verb,

    A line, a comparison or contrast

    A curve, a series, a set,

    A set of curves, an equilibrium

    A set of actions, a set of transformations, operations

    A set of causes, a set of incentives

    The incentives are always acquisition of some sort of asset to the life form, man.

    When I develop definitions, series, tables, equilibria, I’m getting as close as possible to a description of social phenomenon using the same extreme parsimony as gary stanley becker.

    Why? These are PROOFS. A proof doesn’t make a truth claim, but it says something is possible by these means, and that other things are not possible by that same means. And that any competing explanation would have to be even more parsimonious. Parsimony is hard to refute.

    I look to create PROOFS IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (cooperation). And so I draft (test) a lot of proofs as I go along. I refine them like a poet refines poetry one subtle bit at a time. Or, as software people call it – refactoring.

    Once we have PROOFS we can then create narratives that explain them.

    I create proofs, and usually, other people explain them somewhat better than I do for each MARKET For understanding.

    I other words, I supply formulae, and others use them to construct arguments for various markets for understanding.

    Or stated differently: I DESCRIBE LAWS, and JUDGES apply them.

    DO YOU SEE NOW????????

    I am trying to find JUDGES, PROSECUTORS, of natural law.

    — why is it funny —

    Because what I see when people play with curt-posting is

    (a) those paintings from college of proofs.

    (b) used as memes and green frogs.

    (c) and even in that form they have value.

    (d) and I love the fuckers who make them.

    So I see it as ‘my people’, the people I love, kicking my ass for not serving their market.

    The problem is their market is too costly for me alone.

    So I must produce a raw material that others can use to serve them, in their own language.

    I love trash talking. I love my people. I love men willing to fight. I love that our men are finally fighting.

    But you know, we gotta make heavy weapons to defeat Cultural Marxism, and I’m the anti-marx and I”m making the anti-frankfrurt school. See????

    I love my people but you know, I could use a little love back now and then. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 04:53:00 UTC

  • by James Augustus —“I don’t really think that you got the answer you were look

    by James Augustus

    —“I don’t really think that you got the answer you were looking for. It seemed more of an observation that the church failed along with other institutions, but not specifically *why* the church failed, which I think is not to difficult to explain.

    The church failed because in a market for lies, the most comforting lies (Cultural Marxism) will out-compete less comforting lies (Christianity), not to mention uncomfortable truths (Aristocracy).

    The solution, of course, is what you state, and repeatedly: truth.”—

    And there we go. 🙂

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 04:24:00 UTC

  • ( Like I said. See the difference six months make? next year. our crew will be t

    ( Like I said. See the difference six months make? next year. our crew will be terrifying. 🙂 )

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-12 19:31:00 UTC

  • “The entire purpose of cultural Marxism is to “change societal consciousness”. T

    —“The entire purpose of cultural Marxism is to “change societal consciousness”. The Marxists could not figure why Western Europe was not proceeding to communism. The Frankfurt school got together for that purpose. They created critical theory and over the years there have been dozens of offshoots. It is Marx’s material dialectic applied to culture and coupled with a kind social psychoanalysis. Supposedly, The dialectic (thesis, antithesis, and synthesis) is applied to root out objectification, alienation, and oppression and bring about liberation. Marcuse, Horkheimer, Fromm, Adorno, and Jurgen Habermas are some big names. However, it is just pseudoscience.”—Clifton Knox

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-12 19:27:00 UTC

  • WHY GO AFTER THE CHURCH SO HARD TODAY? —“Curt: Did someone steal your sacramen

    WHY GO AFTER THE CHURCH SO HARD TODAY?

    —“Curt: Did someone steal your sacramental wine? Never saw you go after the church so hard.”—Arnold Brunson

    I am just trying to gin up some arguments to see what kind of reactions people have.

    Our church failed to compete with the new church that replaced it. The new church is evil as hell. But can the old church compete? How can we produce a church of europe that CAN compete with Cultural Marxism?

    I tried to drive the discussion all day from various angles. (without giving away what I was driving at.) Finally someone got it.

    Why? At someone’s suggestion, I spent last night working on how murderous islam had been until 1920. We only defeated them a century ago and they’re back already.

    But what’s really changed? Marxism is just islam/judaism restated. democratic secular socialist humanism is just marxism restated. Why do we fail? Why did our church fail us for so many centuries. Why did we recover so quickly under empiricism, literacy, and the balance of powers? Why did we develop so quickly under literacy, reason, and the division of powers in the ancient world?

    I know the answer you know and it doesn’t look good for christianity. It just looks good for jesus and the saints.

    Islam is an exceptional religion for idiots, and they are going to win unless we kill them off for good, as well as marxism, judaism, and democratic secular socialist humanism.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-12 18:08:00 UTC

  • DIFFERENCES IN PERSONALITY ARE EXACTLY WHAT YOU’D EXPECT FROM THE STEREOTYPES. (

    http://www.people.vcu.edu/~mamcdani/Publications/AOM_as_of_8%201%202008.pdfRACIAL DIFFERENCES IN PERSONALITY ARE EXACTLY WHAT YOU’D EXPECT FROM THE STEREOTYPES. (AND OTHER RESEARCH)

    (note that this is a huge sample size)

    —“Using 567 effect sizes and a total sample size of over

    one million, the present meta-analysis estimates the magnitude of White-Black differences found in scores of Big 5 personality measures as well as measures of locus of control and self-efficacy.

    We offer seven primary conclusions.

    1 – First, we conclude that the magnitudes of the White –Black differences are very small. (Curt says: yep.)

    2 – Our second conclusion is that the magnitude of the White –Black differences for the Big 5 is moderated by the cognitive loading of the personality scales. (Curt says: yep)

    3 – Our third conclusion is that most of our results are primarily consistent with the nil hypothesis which is that there are no differences between Blacks and Whites on four of the seven personality constructs.

    ( Curt interjects and says: yep, we differ in extroversion/introversion, differ in neuroticism/stability, we differ in agreeableness or what HBDchick would call Clannishness. My view again, is that introversion and neuroticism and intelligence are related expressions. in other words it comes down to IQ and distributions.)

    Blacks are slightly more extroverted and emotionally stable, and Whites are slightly more agreeable. (Curt Says: double-yep. )

    4 – Fourth, we conclude that journal data often suppress results that disfavor Blacks. ( Curt says: yep, and conversely, heaps undue praise on what criticizes whites ).

    5 – Fifth, we conclude that Black college students have a slightly more favorable standing on personality variables than White college students. (ie: the black kids tat get to college are more emotionally stable, and pliable.)

    6 – Our sixth conclusion is that mean racial difference in incumbent samples are not smaller than mean racial differences in applicant samples.

    Finally, we conclude that personnel researchers pay far too little attention to the representativeness of their samples.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-12 17:44:00 UTC

  • Today’s winner is!…. —“To be fair almost no institution stood up to cultural

    Today’s winner is!….

    —“To be fair almost no institution stood up to cultural Marxism. The church evolved as required and bested all comers for quite a while. “–Greg Hamilton

    I was looking for this all day.

    YOU CAN’T FIX A PROBLEM UNTIL YOU KNOW THE CAUSE.

    So, now that we’ve had to pull some teeth today, how do you fix the church so that it can compete with cultural marxism?

    Why do people love cultural marxism? Who does?

    See how easy that was?

    (Damn.)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-12 17:30:00 UTC

  • “The Abrahamites still need to rescue their gods from the dry deserts, and show

    —“The Abrahamites still need to rescue their gods from the dry deserts, and show the world how THEY live in peace and harmony with each other.”— Tobie Louw

    ( Don’t talk to me until you clean up your own house so to speak. 🙂 )

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-12 17:26:00 UTC