Love:
– Passion (sexual attraction)
– Friendship (making each other better together than alone)
– Familial ( kin: care for one’s offspring and relations)
– Kith (those who we cooperate with at to one degree or another)
– Mankind (the love of mankind)
It is the father’s love of kith and kin, lacking friendship and passion, lacking direct benefit, only external benefit.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 08:00:00 UTC
So is the avenue of attack then against paul and his lies, and in favor of Jesus and his advice? (universalism)
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 07:52:00 UTC
Intolerance is a virtue (cost) not a vice (discount)
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 07:49:00 UTC
JESUS DIDN’T INVENT CHRISTIANITY, PAUL DID.
by Steve Akins
Jesus didn’t invent Christianity, a Jew named Saul of Tarsus (who never met Jesus during his lifetime) started the cult of Jesus worship that became Christianity by claiming that Jesus was the “only begotten son” of the Jewish god, Yahweh, and that his execution was the ultimate sacrificial offering to Yahweh to atone for all of the sins of humanity. Saul (or Paul) went about trying to convince the denizens of the Roman Empire that this dead Jew named Jesus was “God” incarnate, who died and then resurrected himself and ascended into heaven, and whose law was to love your enemies and to treat foreigners as your own family, so that through the adoption of this Jew-created cult, the Roman Empire that had conquered Judea and destroyed the Jews temple in Jerusalem, was ultimately destroyed by being subjugated though the adoption of this cult of tolerance, just as the Jews intended.
by Curt Doolittle
Jews (Paul) adopted the female strategy against alphas: gossip.
Jesus was brilliant as a philosopher, even a philosopher in primitive verse. It was Paul who made it into the first version of marxism.
Intolerance is a virtue (cost) not a vice (discount).
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 07:49:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 07:45:00 UTC
DUAL ETHICS
by Ivan Ilakovac
In dual ethics the distinction is made between the members of your group and those that are outside of the group. Hence the hate and genocidal attitude towards goyim and infidels. In universal ethics there is no such distinction. Everyone is equal (under the Law.)
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 07:31:00 UTC
COMMUNIST? OK. WHERE IS THIS COMING FROM?
—“Die you Communist bastard”— Blaine Mack
So, just how stupid, ignorant, and lazy would you have to be to call me a communist????
Yesterday someone called me a SJW? WTF?????
Where the f-ck do these people come from?????? lol
I am as far right a libertarian as you can possibly be, without stepping over the line into fascism. And even then, I understand that fascism is necessary in times of voluntary transformation or involuntary warfare.
Natural law = reciprocity.
But to conduct reciprocity you must have something to trade. No matter how poor we are, we all have something to trade. What we have to trade is leaving one another’s attention, body, and property alone, and the preservation, maintenance, and improvement of the commons whether territorial, physical, normative, or institutional.
HERE, DEFINE YOURSELF:
What kind of anti-market activity do you prefer?
– Fascism: anti-market for politics, commons, norms, and limited market for goods, services, and information
– Libertarianism: anti-market for commons, politics, but market for norms, goods, services, information.
– Libertinism: anti-market for norms,politics, but market for goods, services and information.
– Classical Liberalism: markets for good services and information, with limited-market for commons.
– Aristocracy: markets for everything except law and politics.
– Democratic socialism: minimum markets for politics, commons, and private property.
– Socialism: anti market for goods, services, and information
– Communism: anti market for politics, commons, norms, goods, services, and information.
CONSERVATIVE (MALE) Social Conservatives limit the market for goods, services, information, norms, commons, politics, to that which is EVIDENTIARY, and imposes no costs, requiring individuals develop agency and discipline – however they do so in archaic moral (childlike) language with a touch of economics thrown in.
PROGRESSIVE (FEMALE) Social Progressives limit the market for goods services, information, norms, commons, and politics to that which is HYPOTHETICAL, and imposes any possible costs, therefore NOT requiring individuals to develop agency and discipline – however they do so in modern moral and pseudoscientific language.
The frankfurt school modernized female discourse, but we have had no aristocratic school equivalent (until now) to modernize male language. Why? Uncomfortable Truths that ask us to pay the costs of discipline in pursuit of agency is harder (more expensive in the short term) than Comforting Lies that tell us to forgo the costs of discipline and agency in the short term in favor of consumption (indiscipline) in the short term.
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine.
( PS: Did you see how I made use of full accounting of markets and political disciplines by using series, and then supply demand between the male and female curves? See? Methodology at work.)
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 07:23:00 UTC
JESUS’ INNOVATIONS
by Aaron Kahland
I’m no expert on the subject but my intuition is that Jesus launched a veiled rebellion against the Old Testament.
He rejected dual ethics and replaced it with universal ethics the latter of which was crucial for the rule of law.
Islam then reintroduced dual ethics.
It is of no surprise to those who believe (as I do) that Islam was constructed from Jewish religious texts.
I would argue that Jesus differentiated between personal morality and the law (ethics) – a crucial innovation.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 05:51:00 UTC
ON BRAGGADOCIO.
I use this technique to taunt opponents. I learned from hayek what NOT to do (be a gentleman), and I learned from Friedman what you should do (be a relentless antagonist). So what I do is basically trash talk as a means of taunting people into argument. I used this strategy to promote Propertarianism, and it made more sense to restore the manliness of sport and war to the discourse than continue the effeminate model of the academy.
So while it comes fairly natural to me, I chose this particular strategy to market to a candidate audience.
Why?
Don’t ask. Don’t appeal. Don’t beg. CHALLENGE.
Stand on the hill and take all comers worthy of the fight.
I use many voices when I write. I experiment. Braggadocio, Taunting, reasonableness, empathy, and analytic argument.
And I use them in response to the approach of the person or audience I’m addressing.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 05:33:00 UTC
SO, CURTPOSTING is now a meme that someone started (I don’t know who really) where you copy-paste some bit and modify it absurdly, humorously, sarcastically, or insultingly.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 05:27:00 UTC