BETAS GOTTA BETA
You know, I was the shortest guy in my class for a long time, but I never would take it. It only gets worse, so I fought my way through school usually one or more fights per week, sometimes more than one a day. Then I’d go home to an alcoholic and abusive father.
Eat the parasitic. Fight evil. Collect allies. Prey on both.
Betas need dominance. GIve it to them.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-26 13:49:00 UTC
DEFINITION: INTELLIGENCE
The rate at which one adapts to new information that increasingly depends upon predicate information to extend perception allowing comparisons and decisions of that which is increasingly closed to direct perception.
Ergo, the rate at which we acquire and adapt to increasingly abstract general and specific rules of the universe.
Ergo, how long will it take you and how many repetitions to master an idea that is currently beyond your comprehension.
For some of us merely hearing it the first time causes us to organize our thoughts and ideas in moments. For others they take much longer, and for some they cannot really grasp what is beyond physical repetition.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-26 13:39:00 UTC
IT’S OK TO SUGGEST FRIENDS.
(only under rare circumstances to I ‘friend’ people. but if you suggest someone and we have common friends, that’s ok. Just remember that Testimonialists have a zero tolerance for stupid.) 😉
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-26 13:37:00 UTC
The minute you have skin in the game, you become an advocate of meritocracy. The moment you can obtain returns without skin in the game, you become an advocate of equalitarianism.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-26 13:21:00 UTC
SOMETHING CATTY? (GOD EMPEROR TRUMP)
Can I be a twit and say something catty? I’m going to anyway. lol
Just how it should be.
– A german protestant nationalist king. (Donald)
– A catholic nationalist slavic queen. (Melania)
– European Jewish servants (kushners)
It just doesn’t get better than that. lol.
Seriously. We had the perfect government. What the hell did we do to ourselves?
Sorry. I want beautiful queens. Intolerant Kings, and I’m happy if the jews run around doing the paperwork for fun and profit.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-26 12:45:00 UTC
CIVILIZATIONS MAKE EXCUSES AND LABEL THEM ‘GOOD’
OMFG. Here. I’ll say it differently. Here is half of history reduced for you in to a few paragraphs.
In the west the aristocracy used markets and law, and the promise of freedom to domesticate people. This created a lot of room for men to obtain dominance signals in family, military, property, commerce, and intellectual pursuits. They aggressively killed off their underclasses in large numbers.
In the middle east, they used slavery to domesticate people, and the promise of equality under ‘god’ are they were happy with that structure, since by retaining tribal boundaries they left a lot of room for males to obtain dominance signals within their micro-tribes. Because subsistence costs were low, the maintained their underclasses in large numbers.
In the far east they used bureaucracy and markets to domesticate people, without promise of freedom, but with promise of access to the bureaucracy. they aggressively killed off their underclasses in ast numbers.
It’s not complicated really.
We have been taught a history of BELIEF, rather than the history of JUSTIFICATIONS (excuses) people made to cast necessity as ‘good’.
I mean, here. I’ll make it IDIOT-SIMPLE: Basic problem: Human males of the four macro races, are all super-predators. Some of them smart and some of them stupid, and some of them a little less stupid. Every society is organized in a way that keeps the super-predators at least somewhat happy, since it takes only a VERY FUCKING SMALL NUMBER OF THEM to return to their natural super-predator occupation, and destroy everything in sight.
THAT IS THE PROBLEM CIVILIZATIONS FACE: how do you make enough super-predator males reasonably happy that they prefer to be cage-fed, rather than chase down prey? That’s it.
After that, it’s all luxury goods.
Now, the best way to do that? Cull the stupid ones until there are only less stupid and smart one’s left, who prefer to conduct their predation in markets, which produces a whole lot of productivity that drags mankind out of ignorance and poverty.
Now, do I have to bitch-slap the entire fucking world to make this kindergarden level bit of scientific evidence get through your fucking thick skulls????? Huh?
Enough of this nice ‘common good’ stuff. WE ARE SUPER PREDATORS and personally, I’d rather prey than labor. So if you wanna NOT have me and mine and those like me, prey upon you we agree to do so as long as we all work in markets.
But the last thing a super predator is going to do is let some parasite prey on him without doing something about it.
And we’re getting REALLY READY to DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT.
Curt Doolittle
(too many invectives to attach this post to the institute)
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-26 12:36:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-26 11:57:00 UTC
INCOME VS CAPITAL
Do you realize that all this international sense of wealth and opportunity is coming from a small number of outlier companies and the press that promotes them, an ignorant young generation riding on the last vestiges of fiat debt, and the use of post-peasant labor to maintain low prices?
Economists who calculate income rather than capital are as stupid as people who calculate income statements rather than balance sheets.
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-26 11:27:00 UTC
OF COURSE WE CAN PUNISH ILES
When did we STOP punishing lies in public? (libel, slander, duel, fights between men?)
How much debate was there over the freedom of speech and press? A great deal. Because the lies of the church did good in the eyes of the founders. Because the press allowed the propagation of the lies upon which the american revolution was founded as well as the rational and moral arguments. But mostly because they couldn’t figure out how to manage it in court. And they felt it less necessary to manage in court because of the physical punishments men laid out upon each other such that it was not NECESSARY to lay out in court.
Now lets look at recent evolutions in knowledge: like empiricism (measurement), and darwinianism (evolution) despite the fact that we had been domesticating animals over 12000 years ago? I mean, its not a very complicated idea. Why did it take so long?
(a) when did we begin to understand the scientific method, and how long did it take us?
(b) when did we solve the major problems of the foundations of mathematics and logic?
(c) when did we discover both econometrics (economics) and statistics?
(d) when and why did we switch from justifiation to criticism in order to advance science?
(e) when and why did the operational revolutoin fail in the early 20th century, despite being ‘discovered’ in every major theoretical discipline? I mean, the entirety of the philosophy of language could have been settled, and a century of nonsense saved, and god knows what else?
I mean, the history of mankind consists of the gradual domestication of the beast man.
ANd while in history education was the primary objective…. ONCE EDUCATION HAS BEEN ACHIEVED, THEN THE PRIMARY IMPROVEMENT IS TO ELIMINATE ERROR BIAS, AND DECEIT.
We live in an era where nearly all information is free for the simple cost of investing the time to learn it. The only thing we can do to improve the lot of man, and to prevent regression tot he mean, is to eliminate error, bias, wishful thinking and deceit.
We live in an era where we have suppressed parasitism (violence, theft, commercial fraud) such that financialization and politics are the two primary means of improving our lot, and preventing regression toward the mean.
If we have the methods of testing truthful speech (we do), then there is no reason we cannot do as every generation in history has done: outlaw through law, new methods of crime, that man has discovered.
And what was discovered in the late 1700’s was to advance scripturalism to pseudorationalsim (Rousseau/Kant), and then in the later 1800’s how to advance pseudorationalism to pseudoscience (Marx, boaz, freud), and then in the early 1900’s to distribute the task to many disinformation specialists (the frankfurt school), and then to use mass media to distribute it (socialists), and then to use it to take over the academy, and from there indoctrinate the political system, and the buy offf the polity with debt, producing the upcoming crash to end all crashes.
We have, for most of human history regulated lying and insult (non-truthful criticism) by interpersonal violence and duel. The press was regulated to prevent its abuse. But then the press was ‘de-regulated’ by the american revolution, and the ending of libel, slander, duel, and ‘fighting’. The cheap printing, newspapers, pamphlets, paperback books, movies, telephone, radio, television, and mass media, and now the internet have put distance between liar and victim and allowed the industralization of deception that we call ‘propaganda’ to bathe our people in information which they lack the means of rationally testing if able, and which seduce those whose wants it satisfies.
It is as evil as the invention of abrahamism and ‘the book’ – the similarity of ‘the book’/’the pulpit’, and ‘pseudoscience’ /’the media’ should not be lost on the most dim of us. Where the ancient world involved the saturation of the schools with liars, the present involves the saturation of schools, academy, and the informational environment with liars. Our people are saturated with lies they cannot defend themselves from, and saturated witha liens that they cannot defend themselves from. Meanwhile their families shrink, their civilization dies – and a few simpletons criticize me for putting for a rational means of rather simply making use of our existing legal system to apply the same standards to political speech that we do to commercial: reciprocity.
What the hell makes you think that (a) people won’t cooperate for both good and bad at massive scale, and that people won’t conduct war by disinformation and the suppression of disinformation?
I mean. You can spout an OPINION but what examples in history can you give, of any scale, that have any substance, that mirror even this one sketch that I’ve just written?
I mean, it’s one thing to remain skeptical, and it’s another to hold an opinion that is contrary to all accumulated evidence in all of history for all of mankind…. Jeez….
Color me frustrated with simpletons.
THE PROBLEM IS NOT COMPLICATED. PEOPLE ARE JUST IGNORANT AND STUPID
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-26 11:16:00 UTC
—“Anarcho Capitalism is a cesspool where the people who are just intelligent enough to grasp abstract concepts coalesce and sink, while those who can also manipulate them, move onward.”—Johannes Kruebal
Source date (UTC): 2017-05-26 10:35:00 UTC