—“Rule of Law is only sustainable when a sufficient body of high Agency men federate together to protect their commons from being undermined. … Therefore we must ensure that our commons is producing a sufficient number of capable and incentivized men as needed to enforce Rule of Law. “—Noah J Revoy
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-24 13:18:00 UTC
CLARITY ON GOVERNMENT
—“Can you make your point crystal clear then? Amid excess verbiage, I have distilled out a set of arguments that 1) China’s form of government won the 20th century and 2) that form of government is Nazism and 3) is a desirable model to emulate”—AlcoholFrei15
Rome invented good Govt. China good bureaucratic. France restored it in National Socialism. Germany practiced it. Now China does. This form of government is the world-historical norm. Ideology separates bad from good. “Hurt” states practice hostile ideology. ‘Ideology makes bad’.
Communism is impossible. capitalism is impossible. Mixed economy state capitalism is the historical and necessarily competitive norm. Rule of law or reciprocity with universal standing solves the problem of mixed economy state capitalism, by providing a market for policing it.
That leaves the west facing the big lies: (a) preventing falsehood in discourse and undermining from within(truthful speech) (b) willingness to tolerate redistributive policy(ethnocentrism, homogeneity), and (c) preventing regression to the mean (eugenics).
I don’t lie about it.
We solve those problems. The only way to solve them and maintain the limited benefits of scale is (a) rule of law by strictly constructed rule of law (crosses all boundaries), (b) loose military federation, (c) of diverse states that customize their polities for their needs.
And if we don’t we’ll have another bloody war that ends up with one brand of ideological left or right nazi or another.
So how do we solve the problems of the present?
No more lies.
The Truth is Enough.
Rule of Law of Reciprocity,
Truthful Speech, and;
Let 1000 Nations Bloom.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-24 13:16:00 UTC
WE MUST EDUCATE TO WIN. THE ART OF EDUCATING MEN
—“I believe the initial post was just the top quoted part. I distinctly remember people recoiling in response. Did you go back and add to it later? Am I to understand the initial post was the bait to explain your point on soft eugenics further? If so, thanks for clarifying”—AlcoholFrei15
Correct. KOTH Games. Look at the range of responses it provoked. Once someone has the right answer, post it. Force the audience to teach each other. This is the Socratic method for men: dominance play. It is the cure to victorian posturing and philosophical sophistry in debate.
Lesson: Attention is a currency. It is hard to obtain. Generate controversy to generate attention. Generate involvement in the controversy. Help the audience resolve the controversy. Post the solution crowning a king of the Hill. “Teach those who can’t be taught.” Make them CARE.
Men only learn to reinforce their biases because it’s all they care about. But make men fight for what they care about, and they will (eventually) learn anything. This is why education fails men: they don’t make it adversarial status and hierarchy forming – so they stop CARING.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-24 13:12:00 UTC
https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/07/24/the-choice-episode-0008-why-we-cant-respond-to-covid-the-deep-answer/https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/07/24/the-choice-episode-0008-why-we-cant-respond-to-covid-the-deep-answer/Updated Jul 24, 2020, 9:33 AM
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-24 09:33:00 UTC
https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/07/24/the-choice-episode-0008-china-illustrates-that-fascism-won/https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/07/24/the-choice-episode-0008-china-illustrates-that-fascism-won/Updated Jul 24, 2020, 9:33 AM
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-24 09:33:00 UTC
Q&A: POSITION ON FEMINISM AND PATRIARCHY?
(Note: Impulsive boys demand certainty – patient men understand human determinism)
—“Where does P stand on feminism and patriarchy”—
1) “FEMINISM: the advocacy of women’s rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes.”
EQUALITY IN THE LAW:
The only equality is in our necessary equality before the law, in matters of dispute resolution. This is the only equality that does and must exist.
OTHERWISE INEQUALITY
“Males and females divide the reproductive, sensory, perceptive, cognitive, advocacy, and labor of a civilization by population and time, with females in the shorter term and between individuals, and males in the longer term between polities.”
This division of labor is rather obvious because men generally allow women to control their female relative’s reproduction, and men’s reproduction is limited by the pool of available females in the polity, and the male polity’s ability to maintain a quality stock of females, who will happily defect to other men or polities (hypergamy) if it’s in their individual advantage, regardless of the cost to the polity (males).
CONSEQUENCES
We demonstrate inequality in our abilities, preference, and interests, and this inequality of ability, preference, and interests favors empathy, consumption, the interpersonal, and social among females, versus empiricism, capitalization, the economic, political, and military among males – and the more liberty we have to express those inequalities in our abilities, interests, and preferences the more we bias to pursue them.
The evolutionary and competitive value of adversarial competition is demonstrably a majority male bias, reinforced by loyalty at the cost of adaptability to different groups.. The evolutionary and competitive value of consensus-seeking internally to any group is demonstrably a majority female bias – though lacking any loyalty, but grater individual adaptability to different groups.
Men and women coddle women for evolutionary reasons. And Women drive down adversarial competition in all organizations so that they can tolerate participation. This is why women drive down the competitive advantage of innovative and capitalizing organizations, and drive up the uncompetitive costs of accommodation and consumption. This is why any industry women enter into and become a majority declines in innovation, income, and associated prestige.
It’s why women are generally put in charge of organizations where the men can’t agree on a direction (holding place), are or in organizations in decline (provide cover), or are purely symbolic (appearances). And so few women (though they do exist) are at the top.
In the military, in any non-administrative, non-medical role – women drive down adversarial competition, largely put men at risk in combat, in jobs better done by men, have more job opportunities elsewhere, and so consume resources and jobs for men without those opportunities, and are wasting prime reproductive value. (period).
CONCLUSION
Forced integration prevents market from doing its job of teaching us the truth. The market solves these problems just fine if we let the market solve them. Forced integration of the sexes has been as damaging as forced integration of the races.
Equality under the law is the only necessary or desirable equality.
2) “PATRIARCHY: a system of society or government in which the father or eldest male is head of the family and descent is traced through the male line. Or, a system of society or government in which men hold the power and women are largely excluded from it.”
My position is well documented, that there is value in a ‘house’ for any class with divergent interests, and that military, economic(biz, industry, capital), labor(salaried, hourly), and reproductive (female) houses force exchanges between the classes.
So we identify the political problem of enfranchising both labor and women without providing them with separate houses, so that the classes can negotiate trades, rather than parties which race to the bottom.
And that these differences are common sense and there is little evidence that constitutional monarchies hiring a professional cabinet, with voters limited to veto of appropriations, aren’t better than democracies – which as always, crash and burn.
In our constitution, we lay out the options for government given the demographics and economy and the polity can choose.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-24 09:30:00 UTC
WHERE CAN I LEARN P-LAW
—“Where can I read more about P-Law?”—Amir Lounes
Go to: http://propertarianism.com/ > Main Menu > Propertarianism.
Go to: http://seconddeclaration.org/ to see our political policies.
P-Law is like learning how to write the law with programming.
Understanding western civilization’s strategy is really easy.
The fundamentals are relatively easy. (reciprocity, truth)
The scope of learning applied P-Law is huge.
Doing it is hard.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-23 15:42:00 UTC
What would you trade for a sense of ‘belonging’ to a people, a history, a present mission, a vision of the future?
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-23 15:17:00 UTC
PLEASE DON’T FEED TROLLS. 😉
Please Don’t feed trolls. Just @ or PM me so I can block them.
P-Law is an IQ Test. The dissident right can’t pass it. 😉 They are the window-lickers of the European tradition. And Social Media provides them an endless supply of short buses.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-23 14:35:00 UTC
FULL ANSWER OF WHY ROME FELL: OVEREXTENSION OF THE HEROIC POPULATION
Short Version: The western Roman empire dramatically overextended but would have recovered, even from the invasions except for the folly of slaves(immigrants) and Christianity(Judaism / Marxism / Neo-Marxism / Feminism / Postmodernism), and finally the Islamic invasion and destruction of the civilized worlds.
REASONS
1 – Overextension of Colonization: Celtic holocaust created the opportunity for north germanic migration, just as defeating Germany and Europe in WW2 left a vacuum for marxism Judaism and Islam today. And leaving African colonialization incomplete left opportunity for Islam.
2 – Overextension of Range – from the Mediterranean coastal army, with naval transport and strike capability – which is cheap – to a primarily territorial military among hostile less developed people that was expensive. In other words, the cost of domesticating (settling, urbanizing, spreading literacy, commerce, and law) Europe was too high for the returns. (just like today)
3 – Overextension of Agrarian Economy – the empire needed industrialization. The greeks failed to reform their economy. The Romans improved administration and organization – second to none
4 – Overextension of Technology – the empire given the technology at the time, which led to corruption, assassinations, and use of force to obtain rents, rather than profitable service of the state, to obtain status. (just like today)
Bad Strategic Response to Overextension – Splitting the empire with the trade wealth in the greek east but the aristocracy in the roman west. Just like we have all these foreign costs in Europe and in the middle east just to protect Europe from oil price catastrophes – that don’t affect us.
Overextension of Elites Necessary To Govern – empire so that the ratio of elites and middle class to conquered and slaves was too high to rule, just like we have too many non-whites to rule today, and the middle east to govern thru Israel and the monarchies today.
Overextension of soldiery beyond supplying demographic – so that the military was no longer ‘citizens’ – but mercenaries – (Just like Hispanics, Blacks, and Muslims in the military today who are there for a jobs program not patriotism and ‘the people’)
Overextension of Immigration (Slaves): slaves were the old world’s version of third world immigrants today. These people lack the values traditions and culture and if brought in sufficient numbers will always rebel against the host population until they defeat them.
Overextension of TOLERANCE: Christianity undermined values like Christianity v2 (postmodernism-feminism-multiculturalism-equalitarianism) undermined our values. They shifted focus from European zest for life and achievement, for ignorance of life and fantasy after death. Christianity without warfare to dominate it, makes men weak. So Christianity prevented the restoration of the roman empire.
Overextension and Vulnerability to Plague: The soldiers brought back either measles or smallpox or the plague from the middle east and decimated the population.
Fragility to Shocks: The Muslim conquests destroyed the economies of the developed world, profit from conquest was exhausted by 1100, and islam’s mandatory ignorance reduced the developed civilizations to ashes.
Judaism to undermine. Christianity to weaken, Islam to destroy the cancer of the abaramic religions – the war on civilization, evolution, and life itself.
The answer for Rome and for America (europe) is the same: ethno-nationalization of the organs of state and organs of the state, and finance, at all levels, and specialization in running the state – not just here but anywhere we can function as a military, administrative, judicial elite (without outbreeding).
Gibbon gave a classic formulation of reasons why the Fall happened. He gave great weight to internal decline as well as to attacks from outside the Empire.
—“The story of its ruin is simple and obvious; and, instead of inquiring why the Roman empire was destroyed, we should rather be surprised that it had subsisted so long. The victorious legions, who, in distant wars, acquired the vices of strangers and mercenaries, first oppressed the freedom of the republic, and afterwards violated the majesty of the purple. The emperors, anxious for their personal safety and the public peace, were reduced to the base expedient of corrupting the discipline which rendered them alike formidable to their sovereign and to the enemy; the vigour of the military government was relaxed, and finally dissolved, by the partial institutions of Constantine; and the Roman world was overwhelmed by a deluge of Barbarians. … (AND) … As the happiness of a future life is the great object of religion, we may hear without surprise or scandal that the introduction, or at least the abuse of Christianity, had some influence on the decline and fall of the Roman empire… the soldiers’ pay was lavished on the useless multitudes of both sexes who could only plead the merits of abstinence and chastity… If the decline of the Roman empire was hastened by the conversion of Constantine, his victorious religion broke the violence of the fall, and mollified the ferocious temper of the conquerors.”—
-Curt Doolittle
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-23 14:31:00 UTC