THE HIERARCHY –
FROM LOW PRECISION HIGH CONTEXT TO HIGH PRECISION LOW CONTEXT
3) Roman Paganism (archetypes) (categories and measures)
2) Roman Stoicism (virtues) (via positiva) (subcategories and measures)
1) Roman Law (limits) (via negativa) (further subcategories and measures)
0) The Laws of Nature (science) further subcategories and measures)
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-11 11:42:00 UTC
—“If I can’t survive and speak truthfully…. what’s the alternative? What can I do differently?”—
Say nothing when possible.
Say the least possible and obscurant when you can’t say nothing.
Simply agree when you can’t say the least possible.
Remember Them.
Return to Punish them for the use of ir-reciprocity via blackmailing you into stating a falsehood, and causing harm to you, your transcendence, and mankind.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-11 11:30:00 UTC
All our troubles spring from either the ignorance that prevents us from plain clear cut language, or the wilful misuse of language for the purpose of suggestion, deception, and fraud.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-11 11:23:00 UTC
THE SYNTHESIS OF LITERATURE AND TRUTH
(read it and weep) (stoicism) (truthful literature)
THE MONOMYTH – Transcendence (Transformation)
THE ARCHETYPES – Characters (Categories)
THE VIRTUES – Comparison Operators (Values)
THE ORDERS – Axioms (Relations: sets of conditions)
THE NARRATIVES – Operations (Methods of change in state)
THE DISCIPLINES – Mindfulness/Stoicism ( Noise Reduction)
THE SCIENCES – Measurement (reduction of ignorance, error, bias, deception reduction)
THE TRUTH – Parsimony (Most Parsimonious Operational Name of a Recipe of Transformation.)
There exists only one objective – transcendence.
There exists only one narrative – transcendence
There exist only a few sub-narratives – methods of transcendence
There exist only so many non-false virtues – variables of transcendence
There exist only so many portfolios of virtues – transcendent characters.
There exist only so many methods of non-false noise reduction – transcendent mind.
There exist only so many methods of non-false elimination of falsehoods – transcendent reason.
There exists only so many sets of primary operations – transcendent truths.
Via-Positiva:
A myth can employ anthropomorphism in an act of transcendence.
A myth can employ hyperbole (super-normalism) in an act of transcendence.
A myth can employ any technique to create an immoral condition against which one employs virtues to transcend.
A myth can employ virtues in an act of transcendence.
Via Negativa:
A myth cannot contradict the virtue of transcendence.
A myth cannot contradict of a virtue of transcendence in an act of transcendence.
A myth cannot employ a falsehood in an act of transcendence
A myth cannot employ luck or miracles in an act of transcendence.
A myth cannot employ fictionalism (idealism, supernaturalism, pseudoscience/pseudo-rationalism) in an act of transcendence.
If a myth can survive these tests then it is true, and good.
If a myth cannot survives these tests then it is false, and evil.
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-11 11:21:00 UTC
—“The best of stoic ethics has already been incorporated by the Church”– Anon
The best of stoic ethics would include not lying by fictionalism.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-11 11:05:00 UTC
The Virtues that are not false, cause transcendence, not acquiescence.
If you claim a false virtue you just claim that you are weak – You don’t claim a virtue.
So don’t.
Just state that you can only transcend so far, because you are weak.
Weakness is only a problem if you prohibit the transcendence of others.
If you do so, then you are also a parasite, and therefore not virtuous.
It’s not complicated.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-11 11:03:00 UTC
YOU ARE WEAK
The Romantic. The Intuitive. The Spiritual. The Occult.
Just be honest. You’re a woman. And you need the comforting lies of a woman.
Because you aren’t sovereign. You aren’t a man. You haven’t transcended.
You can’t rely on reason alone.
There is only one good. Transcendence.
The rest is just useful or not, preferable or not. true or false.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-11 11:01:00 UTC
CTHULU SWIMS LEFT – IN STOICISM TOO
—“I was under the impression that Stoicism was the antithesis of femininity.”—Steven Edward
That’s true, BUT ‘Cthulu swims left’:
*any portfolio of decidability not explicitly right will be incrementally converted to the left.*
This is why interpretation cannot depend on introspection or intuition but must depend on decidability independent of it.
Ergo, a lot of stoics swing left, and they cause stoicism in all its revivals to swim left.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-11 10:48:00 UTC
I cannot advocate a restoration of Stoicism since this would lead to unscientific and feminine interpretations of very limited ancient texts.
I can however, advocate it’s restatement in entirely ratio-scientific terms.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-11 10:31:00 UTC
(read this)
The Ancient Civilization of Greece and Rome culminated under Roman Paganism, Roman Stoicism, and Roman Law.
Christendom consists of Steppe Orthodoxy, Mediterranean Catholicism, North Sea Protestantism, Anglo/German Puritanism, French/Ango Postmodernism. With the masculine at the start of the spectrum, and feminism at the end of it.
All of christendom has restored some aspect of aristotelianism (science) and stoicism (virtues). But most have preserved some Semitic deceptions, out of habit, indoctrination, familiarity, or ignorance of alternatives.
All of christendom has preserved some aspects of our paganism – particulary in celtic, germanic, slavic, lands – if only in our mythos of pedagogy, hearth, and home. Masculinity survives. It survives most strongly in america which has preserved the militia the longest, and succeeded in defeating the state, rather than defeating the church. This is a lesson for mankind for all eternity. America preserved her churches and her militia longest, by defeating the state, not empowering it or taking it over. Just as anglo saxon man and Classical man would not tolerate the state’s imposition on the militia.
But once we depart the masculine entirely we find the Jewish philosophy.
The Jewish Counter-Enligthenment arrived in the form of Jewish cosmopolitanism in the works of Boaz’s restatement of jewish (feminine) history, Marx’s restatement of jewish (feminine) ethics, sociology, and history, freud’s restatement of jewish (feminine) ethics, and Mises restatement of jewish (feminine) economics, as well as the Frankfurt School’s restatement of jewish (feminine) aesthetics.
If we want to discover social science and the articulation of western civilization’s strategy of truthfulness: it’s Aristotle and Zeno culminating in the Roman Stoics, Defeated by the Eastern Empire under Constantine through Justinian.
The truth (stoicism) was Restored by Galileo, Copernicus, Kepler, DaVinci,Newton, AND Machiavelli Bacon, Locke, Hume, Smith.
THEN the near defeat by the Abrahamic Counter-Enlightenment IN COMPETITION WITH the second scientific and industrial revolution (social sciences) by Maxwell, Poincare, Darwin, Spencer, Hayek, and Nietzsche.
DEFEATED again by the combination of the Jewish (feminine) Abrahamic Counter-Enlightenment, and the French (feminine) counter enlightenment: Postmodernism.
Meanwhile the German (protestant) Counter-Enlightenment (pious, or submissive, masculine) had little consequence, because of Kant and subsequent continental philosophers continuing the conflation of experience, existence, and goodness, instead of truth.
At present, very, very, very, reluctant Jewish social scientists, cautious anglo american cognitive scientists, evangelic british historians and archaeologists, romantic russian archaeologists, a very select group of pragmatic other european scientists, and now (thankfully) competitive chinese scientists, have, at least since the 1980s used science (once again) to defeat the lies of the Abrahamists, whether jewish, french, feminist, or feminist-apologists using feminine strategy of gossip (betas, journalists, writers, artists, teachers, and professors).
The primary challenge we face today is immigration. Because it is fairly certain the the scientific problem will be answered, and the entire feminine argumentative artifice be overthrown, within the next thirty years.
So our primary challenge is to repatriate vast legions, or lock them in ghettos again, or overthrow our governments and kill as many as we can until they leave, so that the science can confirm what men know by intuition.
You cannot fix stupid. You cannot clean genes. And the prosperity of a people is not a matter of opinion and choice but one of incentives produced by a militia of sovereign men in the service of a common enemy, where the common enemy is the universe, and the half humans that surround us, and prevent our conquest of both.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-11 10:29:00 UTC