Demarcations between Us and Them are a truth, a good, and a choice. That choice is reducible to kin vs corporation. There is no alternative.
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-29 12:57:00 UTC
Source: Facebook
-
We can claim we are good. We can claim others are bad. We can demonstrate crime,
We can claim we are good.
We can claim others are bad.
We can demonstrate crime, parasitism and predation.
Or we can defend against crime, parasitism and predation.
And defend against them in deed, word, and display;
And in product, service, and information;
And in trade, politics, and treaty;
And in propaganda, conversion, and religion;
And in reproduction, immigration, and invasion.
Truth is enough.
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-29 12:56:00 UTC
-
“Eli Harman, I may disagree with some of your views, but I am blown away with th
—“Eli Harman, I may disagree with some of your views, but I am blown away with the level of intelligence, knowledge and civility I find when I am reading the posts and commentary on both yours and Curt Doolittle’s pages. Especially after Ive been debating Ivy league progressives for a while, it is simply astounding to see the obvious difference in verbal IQ and reasoning. I admit, its reassuring just to know that current human intelligence is leaning much farther in this direction, and not so much in the other”.—Candice Mary
Argument by exposition of incentives to change in capital (property in toto) vs psychologism; persuasion by offers of exchange vs ridicule, shaming, rallying, guilt; truth vs falsehood in method of argument. In other words, we argue by what is true, voluntary, and productive, vs what is false, involuntary, and parasitic.
We are not kin, we are not friends, we are not allies, and it appears that since you want to lie, cheat, and steal from our productivity; and not to engage in productive, fully informed, and warrantied exchange; and that we are enemies. so why should should I care of your ridicule, shaming, deception and theft – and, for that matter, why should I and mine – tolerate your existence?
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-29 10:16:00 UTC
-
Yeah. Fitness. I don’t have the right exercise equipment here – No redheads. 😉
Yeah. Fitness. I don’t have the right exercise equipment here – No redheads. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-28 10:12:00 UTC
-
ARYAN CAN MEAN: A PEOPLE, A CULTURE, A RELIGION, A CIVILIZATION We can’t claim i
ARYAN CAN MEAN: A PEOPLE, A CULTURE, A RELIGION, A CIVILIZATION
We can’t claim it was a philosophy because as far as I know I am the first person to write it down in logical, rational, and scientific terms.
—“By Aryan do you mean the strictly racial classifications made by Julius Evola?”—Alessandra Bocchi
Unless I state otherwise, I use it in the the and cultural, religious, and civilizational sense of *heroic, individualistic, militaristic, expansionist, technologistic, sky worshipping, aristocratic egalitarian*.
That the system of strategies and values was spread (originally) by an ethnic group, is not material to me. The fact that it is the origin of european civilization is material to me. The fact that it is the cult of my people that I most identify with is material to me. The fact that it gave rise to reason and science is material to me.
But, the fact that this strategy failed everywhere other than in europe where it was exportable to near kin of near ethic constitution is material for all of us.
As far as I can tell it is not exportable outside of ethnic europeans, even if some semblance of it still remains in india and the persian diaspora.
If we integrate with other peoples not only do we die, but Aryanism dies. They are not capable of it.
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-28 08:43:00 UTC
-
ASK ME ANYTHING. TONIGHT, 7/28 @8PM Eastern. I will be doing an AMA on the *Poli
ASK ME ANYTHING. TONIGHT, 7/28 @8PM Eastern.
I will be doing an AMA on the *Politics Discord Server*
Friday at 8 P.M. Eastern with The Edge
On the Discord Broadcasting platform
LINK: https://discord.gg/yVZANSF
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-28 08:14:00 UTC
-
“Where did the Non-Aggression Principle originate? Who was the first philosopher
—“Where did the Non-Aggression Principle originate? Who was the first philosopher to posit this axiom?”—
by Rik Storey
It was a deliberately and impractically broad term to refer to the loose ethics of classical liberals and also to the legal terminology used by many libertarians. It easily adopted an abstract and pseudo religious quality and is now the scourge of sensible people on the right the world over.
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-28 08:12:00 UTC
-
TRUMP ACTS AS A CHRISTIAN MONARCH Trump is plenty intelligent. But he evolved as
TRUMP ACTS AS A CHRISTIAN MONARCH
Trump is plenty intelligent. But he evolved as an entrepreneur who owned a organization, not one who arose in a bureaucracy. *He thinks and acts like a Christian Monarch.* Which is how *I* think as well, from having done the same thing, and how christian monarchs thought from having done the same thing. If I wasn’t already writing a book, I would write one on why this illustrates the difference and superiority of monarchies.
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-28 07:46:00 UTC
-
Curt Doolittle shared a post
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-28 04:18:00 UTC
-
(A) the OBJECTIVE of the Right is to eliminate the international influence of th
(A) the OBJECTIVE of the Right is to eliminate the international influence of the united states, so that we return to a domestic government rather than a (failed) ideological empire.
(B) Assumes that it is not precisely americas intention to force europe to take responsibility for the defense of its territory(russia), trade routes (the seas), resource dependence (oil, gas, coal, and inputs to production), and financial system (the international information, financial, and legal system).
(B) Assumes there is any VALUE to America in having other countries ‘like’ us rather than either respect or fear us. That is contrary to the evidence. All of it.
(C) Assumes it is POSSIBLE for the USA to continue its global policeman and ideological advocate, when in fact, the postwar era has been proven dead by i) islamism, ii) serial failures of democracy around the world, and its replacement with state corporatism, iii) our serial failures at postwar policing, iiii) the evidence that we have been on the wrong side in the world wars, in the Arab Israeli conflict, and in the restraint of china from expansion of trade routes.
Americans were children with a lot of postwar inheritance from the ‘adults’ in europe. While there were never any adults in the USA, unfortunately, there are no adults in europe any longer: we call them monarchies. And all of those monarchs are just waiting for the rest of the 20th century’s failed experiments to come to their natural conclusion.
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-27 21:49:00 UTC