—“Eli Harman, I may disagree with some of your views, but I am blown away with the level of intelligence, knowledge and civility I find when I am reading the posts and commentary on both yours and Curt Doolittle’s pages. Especially after Ive been debating Ivy league progressives for a while, it is simply astounding to see the obvious difference in verbal IQ and reasoning. I admit, its reassuring just to know that current human intelligence is leaning much farther in this direction, and not so much in the other”.—Candice Mary
Argument by exposition of incentives to change in capital (property in toto) vs psychologism; persuasion by offers of exchange vs ridicule, shaming, rallying, guilt; truth vs falsehood in method of argument. In other words, we argue by what is true, voluntary, and productive, vs what is false, involuntary, and parasitic.
We are not kin, we are not friends, we are not allies, and it appears that since you want to lie, cheat, and steal from our productivity; and not to engage in productive, fully informed, and warrantied exchange; and that we are enemies. so why should should I care of your ridicule, shaming, deception and theft – and, for that matter, why should I and mine – tolerate your existence?
Source date (UTC): 2017-07-29 10:16:00 UTC
Leave a Reply