Source: Facebook

  • WHY? : OUR AUTISTIC USE OF TERMS AND “-ISMS” 1) Every philosopher does and must

    WHY? : OUR AUTISTIC USE OF TERMS AND “-ISMS”

    1) Every philosopher does and must add or alter the properties of terms. Otherwise reorganization of categories, relations and values is impossible. The question is only whether we are increasing precision or decreasing precision. In our case we are increasing precision in order to prevent deception by ‘loose language’.

    2) We are removing misrepresentation from terminology by the use of deflation, series, and operational definitions. This means that many terms, when placed in series with related terms, can only ‘fit’ (avoid conflation and misrepresentation) if properties that cause conflation are attributed to one term and not another. By the combination of deflation, isolation of properties, and operational language we all but remove fungibility (use in deception) from terms. Moreover, we eliminate the ability to use deception in the most common manner it is used: the pretense of knowledge where the speaker lacks the knowledge to make the claims he does. Or where he has identified and is making use of a loose relation for the purpose of argument or deduction that does not hold under scrutiny.

    3) All pretense of knowledge and deception is caused by partial or incorrect information causing demand for substitution on the part of the audience, and thereby causing suggestion in the audience.

    4) Suggestion can be used to transfer meaning, which we can then deflate (limit) to truthful propositions. Or suggestion can be used to transfer partial meaning, which we let perform suggestion, or which we expand into falsehood. In other words, we can communicate then limit or we can communication and let the audience expand an idea to unlimited form. Or we can communicate and suggest other limits. And various permutations thereof. So we cannot communicate truthfully without supplying both via positiva (meaning) and via-negativa (limits) so that the competition between meaning and limits allows only potentially true information to survive.

    5) The most successful methods of deception are caused by increasingly *indirect* means of suggestion that cause the audience to perform substitution (fill in the blanks). Advertising (commercial), propaganda(political), and theology(religious) saturation of the environment produces suggestion by deception by the use of overloading the environment. And humans are not able even intentionally to insulate themselves from the free association caused by experiential phenomenon (information). So Advertising, Propaganda, and Theology are methods of deception through deception and overloading.

    6) The use of “-isms”. An “-ism” refers to a portfolio of categories, values, relations that provide decidability within a domain. So an ism is a ‘name’ for an algorithm providing some form of decidability. This ism can be very narrow (platonism) or very broad (marxism). The decidability offered can be true, undecidable, or false, or moral, amoral or immoral. But without referring to ‘-ism’s’ one must list the sometimes long sets of arguments (categories, values, and relations) within them. So it is ‘shorthand’ to use those terms, just like it is shorthand to use math, logic, geometry, calculus, or family, genus, species, race. And yes, it is burdensome on the reader who is ignorant of the subject but comfortable for both the author and the reader who are knowledgeable. The strange question is, why do people read other technical literature, which they must look up and understand terms, yet people who will read technical literature – analytic philosophy, making use of law, economics, science, and mathematics – and expect NOT to look up a lot of terms.

    I find most people rather stupid really. And the world has many more stupid people in it than smart people. But I still love stupid people as long as they desire to be moral. I just get frustrated when stupid but moral people think that the world of information should be built for their consumption like children’s cartoons. That’s not my job. My job is to be right. Not easy.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-04 09:34:00 UTC

  • “Agape (brotherly love)=Mutual cooperation is the least costly survival strategy

    —“Agape (brotherly love)=Mutual cooperation is the least costly survival strategy (until it is not). Natural law.”—Shanaynay Tomson

    (Notice how he transformed a via positiva into a truth statement by the simple addition of limits.)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-04 08:43:00 UTC

  • All organizations capable of generating rents will maximize all rent opportuniti

    All organizations capable of generating rents will maximize all rent opportunities.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-04 08:41:00 UTC

  • Click for video: videos/10000000_1823179237698332_6591858940533800960_n_10155604

    Click for video: videos/10000000_1823179237698332_6591858940533800960_n_10155604822262264.mp4 ASK ME ANYTHING (Reasonably Intelligent) 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-03 16:59:00 UTC

  • It doesn’t matter to me whether he existed or not. What matters is that exhausti

    It doesn’t matter to me whether he existed or not. What matters is that exhaustion of direct opportunity for cooperation is *scientifically* the optimum cooperative strategy, and that by limiting it to direct action within the society where one possesses sufficient knowledge to claim he does good without harm caused by externality, is a sufficient method of eliminating virtue spirals and free riding.

    It doesn’t matter to me whether achilles existed or not, it matters to me that the ordeal of the warrior (the necessity of tragedy) is ‘true’.

    It doesn’t matter to me that Alexander was an unpleasant fellow or that Aristotle was wrong in his physics.

    What matters is that (a) claims of wisdom and truth are not conflated, (b) claims of myth and history are not conflated (c) claims of good are in fact good and bad are in fact bad, (d) that every possible fictional statement be eliminated from every narrative including the pseudorational, pseudoscientific, and pseudomythical.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-03 14:07:00 UTC

  • Politically, the closest affinity I feel is to the Tories. I just don’t have a T

    Politically, the closest affinity I feel is to the Tories. I just don’t have a Tory Party in America to vote for….. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-03 13:16:00 UTC

  • God-> Universalism Gods-> Imperialism Ancestors-> Nationalism That’s The Answer

    God-> Universalism

    Gods-> Imperialism

    Ancestors-> Nationalism

    That’s The Answer.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-03 13:09:00 UTC

  • There are no gods. Jesus was a man. He had a simple message: stop fighting among

    There are no gods. Jesus was a man. He had a simple message: stop fighting amongst yourselves over trivial things and take care of each other. Instead of trigger happy intolerance of the pastoral and slave peoples who lacked property and ability, take the opposite approach which is the extension of kinship love to non kin. That’s all he says. That’s all that matters. And it’s *a purely scientific statement*.

    The ancient world had freed men from desperate dependence upon land, and allowed them to migrate to cultural capital and material capital so that their *human capital* could be put to use.

    However, this transition required that people abandon the trigger sensitivity of pastoralists living on the margins and instead, ENTER THE MARKET for simple labor, and cooperate with many others that had come from different backgrounds.

    So where the tower of babel presented the problem of language and the need for a common language, when craftsmen were pulled from around the new empire to create a new palace, the single, simple lesson of jesus was to provide a common *moral test* for people.

    This is a primitive attempt to achieve the same effect as natural law.

    The problem was not in this message. It was in EVERYTHING ELSE in christianity: which was weaponized to destroy the empire, and all of western civilization.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-03 12:52:00 UTC

  • “Alt-Right is divided!” Men divide into tribes to choose leaders, but tribes fig

    “Alt-Right is divided!”

    Men divide into tribes to choose leaders, but tribes fight together to win wars.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-03 12:14:00 UTC

  • THE EXTERNALITIES OF PHYSICAL AND NORMATIVE LIMITS Creating property has no nega

    THE EXTERNALITIES OF PHYSICAL AND NORMATIVE LIMITS

    Creating property has no negative externalities. Defending property against trespass has no negative externalities.

    It is more than clear that creating normative behavior and defending normative behavior has no negative externalities.

    It is more than clear that ‘disgust response’ and ‘purity response’ and ‘promise of maintaining a state of rational action’ evovled for good reason, and that ‘dusgusting, impure, and irrational’ behavior be limited to one’s bedroom with locked doors, closed windows, and insulation within earshot.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-03 12:05:00 UTC