Source: Facebook

  • “The characteristic feature of the loser is to bemoan, in general terms, mankind

    —“The characteristic feature of the loser is to bemoan, in general terms, mankind’s flaws, biases, contradictions and irrationality without exploiting them for fun and profit.”— Nassim Nicholas Taleb

    Well, you know, I would say that the characteristic feature of western man is (a) the demand for deflationary truth-telling, and (b) to compensate for mankind’s flaws, biases, contradictions, and irrationality by demand for productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange, free of negative externality – and (c) demand for the continuous evolution of the natural, common, law of reciprocity we call ‘tort’ to enforce those demands.

    It is high trust truthful society that is western man’s advantage, and that advantage was achieved through demographic suppression via means of that same natural, common law of reciprocity. Because the west was rarely first, but was always fastest. And that is because there is no faster method of maneuver, adaptation, and decidability, that is provided by markets in association, reproduction, cooperation, commons, and polities, where conflicts are decided by the common law of torts using the natural law of reciprocity, a market for juridical defense. Because the moment an innovative violation of reciprocity is identified it can be encoded into the law, and innovations against that violation of reciprocity immediately correcting all markets.

    So no. The characteristic of *loser civilizations* is to produce those who exploit man’s flaws biases, contradictions and irrationality. The characteristic of western civilization is to inhibit, prosecute, and kill them – thereby leaving only the satisfaction of man’s wants when those wants are free of external imposition of costs upon others.

    Productive, Truthful, Fully Informed, Warrantied, Voluntary Transfer Limited to Productive externalities.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-22 10:36:00 UTC

  • ARE RELIGION AND PHILOSOPHY DEAD? WELL, IT DEPENDS – THEY ARE ‘NARROWED” SIGNIFI

    ARE RELIGION AND PHILOSOPHY DEAD? WELL, IT DEPENDS – THEY ARE ‘NARROWED” SIGNIFICANTLY

    RELIGION

    No. I’ve spent the past three years on this problem and physicial fitness, mindfulness (mental fitness), myth-literature-history-narrative collections(macro rules), are just as important as recipe-formula-law collections.

    One of the things my work in philosophy has taught me, that this article demonstrates, is that if you can’t describe something in a series (spectrum) then you are very likely making the error of an ideal type (unlmited) instead of a category (limited).

    Ergo, the first discipline must be truthful speech. Science as we understand it consists of the process of performing due diligence prior to publication of our speech.

    Physics like mathematics is just *the simplest* of the disciplines. Whereas for example, economics is much harder, and sentience is much harder than economics.

    PHILOSOPHY

    Philosophy has made very little progress in its unique preoccupation: decidability(truth), consent (good), and choice(preference).

    As far as I know, formal logic was a dead end and a waste of a century.

    If I’m correct, and have produced operational logic(action) to replace verbal logic (meaning), then perhaps we will make some progress in philosophy, and finally separate theology, moral fictionalism, and rhetorical calculation, completing the categorical divergence of Zoroaster/Augustine/Constantinople(supernatural), Socrates/Plato/Greece(ideal), and Aristotle/Zeon/Rome(real).

    And we can finally put Plato and the continentals to bed as we have put theology to bed – forever.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-22 09:24:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-22 09:09:00 UTC

  • Funny that the Navy can’t seem to avoid little things like running INTO SUPERTAN

    Funny that the Navy can’t seem to avoid little things like running INTO SUPERTANKERS. I wonder how they’ll do in battle with people *trying* to kill them.

    We are one war away from ending the surface fleet.

    None too soon.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-21 15:17:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-21 14:12:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://www.quora.com/Who-do-you-think-wins-the-war-of-politics-the-United-States-or-Russia/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=78ddfceb

    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-21 12:36:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-21 07:29:00 UTC

  • You don’t understand. The state’s customers are peers in other states. Not citiz

    You don’t understand. The state’s customers are peers in other states. Not citizens.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-21 06:55:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-21 06:50:00 UTC

  • Choose: Many small homogenous high trust eugenic polities, or a few large hetero

    Choose: Many small homogenous high trust eugenic polities, or a few large heterogeneous low trust dysgenic polities.

    It’s pretty simple. You either build europe or east asia and develop eugenically, or you build *anything else* and you get india, south america, arabia, or africa, and you develop dysgenically.

    The central problem is trivial: eugenic reproduction.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-21 06:31:00 UTC