So just as we see the quantum level emerge from some underlying causes, and we see the physical level emerge from underlying causes, and the chemical level from underlying causes, and the biological from underlying causes then we see the same in economics and in language.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-08 10:09:00 UTC
So Mises was wrong in stating that there are no constant relations in economics. Instead, the constant relations are limited to those harmonics (intermediary, or externalities) that limit the consequences of causal relations.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-08 10:06:00 UTC
So logic has no non-trivial value, since the function of logic outside of mathematics – which consists of nothing but constant relations sets is merely the falsification of inconstant relations. Instead, semantics, grammar, and syntax serves to limit relations to sets of constant relations the way lie groups limit causal relations.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-08 10:04:00 UTC
Skepticism is nonsense, but preserving contingency is not only sensible but necessary.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-08 09:23:00 UTC
Mathematics by the virtue of consisting of nothing other than positional names, preserves constant relations, since only constant relations are expressible.
In language we can engage in all sorts of association by non constant relations.
By speaking in actions we speak in constant relations.
It has taken me far too long to simplify it down to something that digestible.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-08 09:21:00 UTC
SMALL STATES FAIL FASTER for the simple reason that they run out of credit capacity faster – that’s why.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-08 09:15:00 UTC
https://www2.wwt.com/all-blog/how-gpus-and-high-performance-computing-can-augment-big-data/GPU’S AND TOPOLOGICAL DATA STRUCTURES
Via @[605597:2048:Kashif Vikaas]
I suppose that its not common knowledge but we were doing this back in 2006, and if you’re going to store data in manifolds (topologies) of N-dimensions of relations, then you can used various pathing algorithms and even possibly N-dimensional visibility algorithms to search content far faster than any existing technology.
This was our intention with Runcible’s technology.
It was just too early and I realized that it was billion dollar research and development effort that I am not intellectually or emotionally of Financially or physically capable of managing without multiple nervous breakdowns. lol
The problem at the time was storing data in each geometry but I think that’s teh difference between indexes and content, and that we should view geometric search engines as indexes of n-dimensional relations.
If you have some vague understanding of what I’m saying here, this is why I understood that (a) actions, and (b) vitruvian semantics, grammar and syntax (metaphysics, and (c) Property in toto, provided computational commensurability in an unclosed data store.
Why? Because for humans to understand anything it must be reduced to an analogy to experience, and as such human perception limits serve as a set of units of measure of all of reality.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-08 09:12:00 UTC
https://www2.wwt.com/all-blog/how-gpus-and-high-performance-computing-can-augment-big-data/GPU’S AND TOPOLOGICAL DATA STRUCTURES
Via Kashif Vikaas
I suppose that its not common knowledge but we were doing this back in 2006, and if you’re going to store data in manifolds (topologies) of N-dimensions of relations, then you can used various pathing algorithms and even possibly N-dimensional visibility algorithms to search content far faster than any existing technology.
This was our intention with Runcible’s technology.
It was just too early and I realized that it was billion dollar research and development effort that I am not intellectually or emotionally of Financially or physically capable of managing without multiple nervous breakdowns. lol
The problem at the time was storing data in each geometry but I think that’s teh difference between indexes and content, and that we should view geometric search engines as indexes of n-dimensional relations.
If you have some vague understanding of what I’m saying here, this is why I understood that (a) actions, and (b) vitruvian semantics, grammar and syntax (metaphysics, and (c) Property in toto, provided computational commensurability in an unclosed data store.
Why? Because for humans to understand anything it must be reduced to an analogy to experience, and as such human perception limits serve as a set of units of measure of all of reality.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-08 09:12:00 UTC
http://www.craigwilly.info/…/emmanuel-todds-linvention…/THE CURRENT STATE OF KNOWLEDGE
Jeff Hawkins: On Intelligence (The Brain)
Daniel Kahneman: Thinking, Fast and Slow (The Mind)
Jonathan Haidt: The Righteous Mind (The Moral Intuition)
Garett Jones: Hive Mind: How Your Nation�s IQ Matters So Much More Than Your Own
William Tucker: Marriage and Civilization
Francis Fukuyama: Trust (The Political Objective)
Francis Fukuyama: Political order and political decay. (Comparative political orders)
Emmanuel Todd: Invention of Europe (see Craig Willy’s Summary here:
http://www.craigwilly.info/…/emmanuel-todds-linvention…/ )
I don’t know anyone who is better at right wing (scientific) political theory than I am. And it’s reducible to the false conflict between international jewish neoconservatism > jewish capitalism > jewish libertarianism > and french/jewish communism AND anglo nationalism under Rule Of Law by Reciprocity (mobile, scandinavian and english) in an adaptive hierarchy, and germanic nationalism under Roman Law of State and People under a formal hierarchy.
In other words, the anglo scandinavian (pirate/viking) model vs the german (agrarian) model.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-08 08:51:00 UTC
The problem of philosophy is not, and never has been logic(via positiva proof) it is overloading (via negativa grammar).
All the supposed ‘logics’ consist of nothing more than domain and range of some dimension of perception, wherein logic (constant relations) is unavoidable.
Logic consists of the attempt to preserve constant relations, and ‘proof’ tells us nothing other than within that set of dimensions constant relations ahve been preserved.
However, by limiting the semantic content to human opertions we preserve constant relations.
Overloading Serves Feminine (Left) Need for Consensus (False consensus bias).
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-08 08:28:00 UTC