Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • THE BOERS HOME

    https://suidlanders.org/BRING THE BOERS HOME

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 13:46:00 UTC

  • “What is your political stance?”— How about Conservative(aristocratic), Libert

    —“What is your political stance?”—

    How about Conservative(aristocratic), Libertarian (rule of law), which means my stance is EUGENIC.

    And certainly not Progressive (priestly), Humanist (rule by discretion), which means DYSGENIC.

    As far as I know:

    (a) we either rule by discretion or rule by law (not legislation but law).

    (b) we either rule by eugenics and wealth, or rule by dysgenics and poverty.

    Because all political orders are deterministic. You either get a massive middle class (classical liberalism), get a caste system (india, south america), or you get a massive underclass (islam).

    Because in the end your relative standard of living is dependent upon the size of your underclass. Really. That’s all it is. Seriously.

    So choose between paying the piper now (conservative wealth and eugenics) or paying the piper later (progressive poverty and dysgenics ).

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 13:27:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 12:55:00 UTC

  • The Feminine Mask —“Psychopathic personality is also consistently documented m

    The Feminine Mask

    —“Psychopathic personality is also consistently documented more often in men versus women; in fact, the ratio has been as high as 20:1.

    However, new research suggests that some of the difference between men and women may not be in the existence of deceitful, manipulative, and exploitive personality traits but in the expression of them. Specifically, these researchers found that women may be more likely to express these personality deficits through behaviors that are typically associated with, and diagnosed as, other mental illnesses.

    For example, these researchers found overlap between some of the symptoms such as histrionic personality disorder or borderline personality disorder. (link is external) A woman whose extreme fear of abandonment leads her to periodic outbursts of rage over real or imagined transgressions, flips between seeing her significant other as either completely perfect or totally evil, or who has to constantly be the center of attention (link is external) certainly isn’t who we think of when we think of the classic psychopath. But she may be just as incapable of true empathy, and just as manipulative and deceitful, as the callous, unemotional male.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 12:44:00 UTC

  • Psychopathy like autism is not a problem other than incentives are more importan

    Psychopathy like autism is not a problem other than incentives are more important to psychopaths than normies. One of the reasons for (((other groups))) success with our high trust group is that they are in fact more sociopathic.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 12:40:00 UTC

  • There is only one natural law, and that is reciprocity. That law is empirically

    There is only one natural law, and that is reciprocity. That law is empirically evolving at all times in that branch of law we call tort. That tort law evolves by incremental suppression of parasitism by new discoveries of irreciprocity that violate the one law of reciprocity. The principle problem in tort history is the failure to define property as property-in-toto, and this problem has been caused by the Ruler’s interest in preventing defectors as well as defeaters, while at the same time collecting fees for doing so. Like regulating an economy via money supply, we have a very hard time finding a measurement that provides us with decidabilty that produces no even worse externalities. The answer in both cases is markets, rule of law, and universal standing in matters of the commons, such that the governor is not necessary as other than a judge of last resort. The west invented rule without government for the same reason we invented law without discretion: the consequence of a voluntary militia of equal sovereigns is the only decidability that is possible is tort (reciprocity).

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 12:10:00 UTC

  • by Daniel Roland Anderson And we have a mechanism for correcting non-corresponde

    by Daniel Roland Anderson

    And we have a mechanism for correcting non-correspondence of the constitution with natural law: the Amendment process—which won’t work in our current demographic situation.

    Do you know many judges you’d trust to implement Natural Law over the plain text of the document?

    I don’t.

    When I hear a “constitutionalist” go on about Natural Law, it’s 99.9% ignorant blather. Curt is the first guy in years to use the term Natural Law in a way that doesn’t make me want to punch someone.

    I suspect Curt provides for decidability whereas others use Natural Law to stand in for “whatever I think is good right now.”

    Curt has done great things for the Common Law that many constitutionalists would throw out with the bathwater if judicial abuse of discretion.

    (CD: Bingo)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 12:04:00 UTC

  • “Natural law, where it conflicts, must supersede the plain text of the constitut

    —“Natural law, where it conflicts, must supersede the plain text of the constitution.”— Zachary Miller

    Yep.

    The constitution either reflects natural law or it is an irreciprocal contract and therefore CANNOT BE A CONSTITUTION of natural law. Ergo, no constitutional construction may violate the natural law of reciprocity.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 12:02:00 UTC

  • (working while playing breaking benjamin, perfect circle, tool, nickelback full

    (working while playing breaking benjamin, perfect circle, tool, nickelback full discographies on shuffle. now, i need my porsche, and some good weather and a couple of pretty girls…. )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 11:58:00 UTC

  • THE PROBLEM OF SYMBOLIC EXISTENCE Or to quote my long time friend Frank Lovell,

    THE PROBLEM OF SYMBOLIC EXISTENCE

    Or to quote my long time friend Frank Lovell, Knowledge of unicorns exists, even if unicorns do not exist. And even this statement depends upon how we demarcate between Knowledge with Information. We actually don’t have a vocabulary for existence as idea or information other than ‘symbol’. And symbol is often confused with ‘glyph’. So, assuming we demarcate symbol and glyph unicorns exist only symbolically while horses exist existentially.

    So for existence we have grammars:

    || platonic < symbolic < constructive(operational) <- descriptive(existential) -> analogistic > literary > and fictional(isms) ||

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 11:57:00 UTC