Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • Abrahamism = authoritarianism (submission) + Pilpul + fictionalism. It is a crit

    Abrahamism = authoritarianism (submission) + Pilpul + fictionalism. It is a criticism of technique, not content. Gods serve as a system of calculation (decidability) by most primitive means (anthropic comparison). Monopoly, authority, justificationism(lying), polymoralism, and fictionalism are very different from markets, reciprocity, truth, and law.

    Abrahamism is hostile to civilization. Which is why jews cannot produce trust, capital, and hold territory and have been repeatedly pushed to near extermination, muslims could use surplus population to conquer, destroy, and rule, but immediately declined into mysticism, dysgenia, tribalism, and poverty, and christianity drove the west into ignorance and poverty from which they only escaped by the reintroduction of scandinavian pagans, germanic law, and greek thought.

    The lessons of the Syrians (Byzantines) that were used to canonize christianity are very simple:

    1 – Extirpate hatred from the human heart.

    2 – Extend kinship love to non kin (Exhaust interpersonal Forgiveness)

    3 – Devote time effort and wealth to interpersonal charity.

    4 – Use political intolerance for those who do otherwise. Personal tolerance political intolerance.

    And by the science we know that this produces maximum possibility for integration and cooperation.

    There is nothing else to be learned. Nothing. ZERO.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-22 09:56:00 UTC

  • Nothing can only equal everything or else nothing cannot exist. 😉

    Nothing can only equal everything or else nothing cannot exist. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-22 09:52:00 UTC

  • Roughly speaking, about 1/4 of people should go through STEM university training

    Roughly speaking, about 1/4 of people should go through STEM university training, and the rest should graduate high school able to work.

    The problem is that we teach nonsense after 6th grade. Roughly half of all educational hours are wasted.

    In my understanding we should enter people into the workforce between 12 and 14 given their rate of maturity, and teach life tools a few hours a day: money, accounting, economics, basic contracts. In fact, it’s very interesting that we teach all the sciences OTHER than the one that is most important: COOPERATION. Instead of cooperation we teach SUBMISSION.

    If we were to do this we would extend work lives, and reverse infantilization, as well as all but eliminate the difficulty entering the work force. We would have vast programs of teaching-in-the-workplace at very low wages, and produce the highest skilled people in the world.

    We could have fully socialized people, a more competente work force, have children in our late teens and twenties, and far lower costs.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-22 09:52:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/31084197_10156304578912264_66323094

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/31084197_10156304578912264_6632309423563866112_n_10156304578907264.jpg Now If I remember correctly this is from a relatively small sample size of largely white people. I might be wrong, but that’s what I recall. That said, it’s about what we’d expect.

    REMEMBER: IQ = Potential, and personality traits can increase potential and decrease potential.Thorsten Stuart NorgateIt’s a very interesting list, and I’m probably smack in the middle being a law enforcement officer with a history degree. But I’ve met many people who have incredibly high IQs who can barely perform daily tasks, such as getting dressed in the right clothes, or not forgetting to shower – and I’m serious!Apr 22, 2018 10:12amTom WattI consider myself an underachiever. Maybe just autistic.

    No patience for the sciences.

    Law was a thought at one time…got woke.Apr 22, 2018 10:38amBrendan HegartyHow the Hell does one have sub 100 iq and become an EE? Rote learning of some solutions cook book?Apr 22, 2018 11:05amJay BryceAffirmative actionApr 22, 2018 11:11amBrendan HegartyYou still have to GET BY at the minimum.Apr 22, 2018 11:12amJay BryceI don’t think you necessarily do. Get pushed through in school and then get hired by a company who needs to meet diversity goals, put you in a back room counting something.Apr 22, 2018 11:14amJaimz BeelThorsten Stuart NorgateApr 22, 2018 11:28amBill JoslinYa those ranges are.quite broadApr 22, 2018 12:14pmMichael AndradeThe distribution for “social scientists” is… generous… at best. Most modern economists are little more than journalists who are very good at their job (producing lies). Sociologists, anthropologists, and Black/Gender/bullshit studies professors are much, much dumber and far, far more arrogant about how smart they’re told they are.

    Source: 6 years in the most Leftist PhD Economics program in the country.Apr 22, 2018 12:22pmDaniel SeisDo you mean jewish males or how is that distributed over sex/race (your best guess)?Apr 22, 2018 11:02pmNow If I remember correctly this is from a relatively small sample size of largely white people. I might be wrong, but that’s what I recall. That said, it’s about what we’d expect.

    REMEMBER: IQ = Potential, and personality traits can increase potential and decrease potential.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-22 09:43:00 UTC

  • It’s so obvious how much better english would be in Anglish, and moreover how An

    It’s so obvious how much better english would be in Anglish, and moreover how Anglish and German would be as mutually intelligible as the other germanic languages. I wish I had the balls to write propertarianism in anglish. lol

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-22 09:37:00 UTC

  • GAME DAY Let’s Play A Game Today: Natural Law Court. In today’s game, pick a top

    GAME DAY

    Let’s Play A Game Today: Natural Law Court.

    In today’s game, pick a topic, event, or person that is in conflict with natural law, name who you would prosecute (can be fictional) and lets see if we can successfully prosecute that case.

    (PS: Please do not waste my time trying to be cunning or funny. you won’t be either, just tedious. lol )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-22 09:34:00 UTC

  • I pray thee gods, deliver us unto kings, and save us from the people

    I pray thee gods, deliver us unto kings, and save us from the people.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-22 09:22:00 UTC

  • I mean, the promise of life after death is a moral hazard, just as a woman ‘sugg

    I mean, the promise of life after death is a moral hazard, just as a woman ‘suggesting’ opportunities if you serve her. This technique (baiting into harm) is the feminine strategy, and it is why women were considered insidious if not hopeless through most of history. So Abrahamism is just the institutionalization of feminine moral hazard, as much as Rule of Law is the institutionalization of masculine contractualism.

    The universe consists of very simple rules, and human behavior is just an extension of that universe. The only difference being that once one has the capacity of memory one can choose both the first available opportunity AND NOT to, such that we preserve capital(energy) for later, higher returns. In other words, the universe must act truthfully but we can make use of cunning.

    There is no difference between female opposition (opportunity) to male reproductive strategy (constraint), and Semitic(feminine) vs Greco/Roman | Egyptian | Persian (masculine) strategies.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-22 09:20:00 UTC

  • ABRAHAMIC MARXISM ~= ABRAHAMIC ISLAMISM by Aaron Kahland (important) Briefly, 1)

    ABRAHAMIC MARXISM ~= ABRAHAMIC ISLAMISM

    by Aaron Kahland

    (important)

    Briefly,

    1) Muslims ~ Proletariat

    2) Kuffar ~ Enemy of the proletariat

    3) Dictatorship of Proletariat ~ Caliphate

    4) Koran ~ das Kapital

    The dialectic is remarkably similar. Islam is more successful than socialism because despite the two being politically inspired, Islam promises paradise in the afterlife, which can never be disproven, whilst Marx promised paradise on Earth – an evident falsehood.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-22 09:11:00 UTC

  • Teaching: Some Read, Some Narrate, Some Speak, Some Preach, Some Interrogate, an

    Teaching: Some Read, Some Narrate, Some Speak, Some Preach, Some Interrogate, and Some Discourse. I teach by discourse, which is very suitable for Seminars. And honestly it is the only way I know how to teach – by guided storytelling. (I learned how to teach and manage by playing dungeons and dragons – really.) However, it is extremely difficult for me to read and speak at the wall, and interrogation is counter-productive. So the principle problem I have been having, now that I am ready to produce courses, is that I can’t actually present well without the ‘class’ (Audience). And the reason is I tailor my storytelling to the audience and their feedback. I can even work well in interview conditions. But without ‘responsiveness’ of an audience I find it almost impossible. Had I moved to London (or ny, or atlanta) instead of taking care of an ill family member I could easily put together a seminar and use that as the basis for videos. And I find it difficult to write without having first taught it. So (thinking out loud) I’m going to see if I an put together some sort of substitute. All in all I’m ‘done’ except for editing. But editing this density of text on this range of topics without practice ‘storytelling’ is actually very hard for me for reasons familiar to most authors – ‘to whom am I speaking’ will devolve into ‘myself’ and that is very hard for everyone other than me to understand. This problem has been dogging me since I left ukraine and the (wonderful) studio we had there.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-22 09:09:00 UTC