http://freetheanimal.com/2018/05/synchronicity-libertarians-conservatives.htmlHOW WE GET ALONG. THE DIVISION OF LABOR. READ IT. COMMENT.
@[100009672279790:2048:Richard Nikoley] Covers the intertemporal division of perception, cognition, labor, and advocacy.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-03 18:57:00 UTC
http://freetheanimal.com/2018/05/synchronicity-libertarians-conservatives.htmlHOW WE GET ALONG. THE DIVISION OF LABOR. READ IT. COMMENT.
Richard Nikoley Covers the intertemporal division of perception, cognition, labor, and advocacy.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-03 18:57:00 UTC
The lack of depth of even the most ambitious lay thinkers never ceases to amaze me. I expect compartmentalizational ignorance from members of the academy, but the laity has no such excuse to specialize. I hear IQ this and that from people the time, and as far as I can tell, endless curiosity, extreme suspicion of your intuitions, the continuous accumulation of knowledge, and the continuous reformation of your frames in response to that knowledge is what creates ‘depth’. And as far as I know, Durant was right: that depth is most likely from the study of one or more dimensions of history- for it is demonstrated history – not justified – that tells us the truth of man.
(someone harassing me me nonsense today)
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-03 17:03:00 UTC
Um. I think you’ll at least understand my restatement of history, once you understand deflationary and critical vs inflationary, conflationary, and fictional grammars.
I am tracking the technologies of truth and deception, and group evolutionary strategy using those grammars, just as you would track the history of linguistics, genes, pottery, or metallurgy.
And I track economics not literature.
And I understand that man seizes opportunities then justifies them.
And I understand the desire for literature in some classes and results in other classes throughout history.
And once you have these understandings, you also attribute very different values and incentives to historical events, just as knowledge of science forced us to rewrite our understanding and history.
Now, you might say I err, but do I err, but it’s extremely unlikely that I err. Because we need do nothing more than study the economics (incentives), and grammars (excuses) to determine whether people acted morally in fact, or immorally, casting themselves as moral.
I am not misguided. My understanding of history is very clearly, the initiation of indo europeans, and the socially destabilizing counter-revolutions against their innovations, because meritocracy, reciprocity, sovereignty, and markets are a threat to every single old order.
The problem that you’ll face is providing superior explanatory power with greater parsimony, without appealing to knowledge that can’t exist in time and space.
You don’t know that (yet).
but that’s what you’re dealing with.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-03 12:21:00 UTC
The high Russian-American IQ is precisely what you’d think because of who can afford to get here.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-03 12:07:00 UTC
I DON’T AND WE CAN’T GIVE A WHIT, WHAT THOSE LACKING AGENCY DESIRE. THEY’RE JUST PETS.
The suppression of local rents by the empire and the increases in trade from the north sea to india made choices available to the underclasses in the past, just as the industrial revolution made choices available to the underclasses in modernity.
And so you’re saying that because it is far harder to train those unwashed filthy, ignorant, and rather stupid masses in rational thought, the common law of reciprocity, and stoic virtues, and heroic myths, that we should allow the spread of marxist, socialist, postmodern, pseudoscientific, supernatural, and authoritarian falsehoods and allow another abrahamic dark age ‘because the self same uplifted underclasses cannot bear the reality of their lower sexual, social, economic, and political market value, despite their newfound ability to experience, and consume, because of their betters.
So yes, there was an abrahamic dark age. No it does not matter what semi-domesticated animals feel, want, desire, when they can be trained to be at least far better domesticated animals with a bit of cost and effort.
We lost over a THOUSAND YEARS, we lost multiple great civilizations, multiple lines of intellectual thought, because of the jewish conversion of roman deflationary language (idealism) into moral sophisms (that you do not know you are yourself repeating at this very moment). The christian destruction of knowledge, the arab destruction of knowledge and the failure of jews with the greatest ability and greatest literacy to do NOTHING AT ALL GOOD and everything possible bad to mankind before we forced aristotelianism upon them in exchange for their freedom – no longer worrying that they would cause prior catastrophes.
So I do understand history. I just don’t make EXCUSES for the familiar, the weak, who, out of twisting my compassion would again put us into ignorance and deceit.
Why is it a good, to tolerate those subhumans lacking the agency to face existential reality? It’s demonstrably not. It’s just more rewarding to rule them, and profit from doing so than it is to outright kill them off.
Or at least, it was until recently.
Now it looks like the opposite is true.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-03 11:59:00 UTC
“GETTING TO DENMARK”
“Getting To Denmark” is a ‘term of art’ or ‘term of convenience’ so to speak in political theory. It means, how do you produce a technologically advanced, high trust polity with high tolerance for redistribution and low political conflict.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-03 11:50:00 UTC
I don’t have the luxury of those arguments because I’m not trying to make excuses for the past, only to correct the present, and prevent catastrophes in the future.
The fact that a people can do well in a germanic country says nothing about them and everything about the germanic country.
The question I want to solve is HOW DO YOU MAKE DENMARK WITHOUT DANES?
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-03 11:47:00 UTC
IT ALL BEGINS WITH THE MILITIA
by Igor Rogov
(brilliant)
The “English” success is more easily attributable to one or two social inventions of Saxons – the free man on his own land, also known as churl and an armed militia or fyrd, which were quite distinct from greek or early roman examples because they persisted as something very essential and spiritual entities which resulted in Magna Carta which was then revitalised in American constitution.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-03 11:43:00 UTC
(((Success?))) It’s because sophistry sells, specializing in moral hazard is the most profitable industry, and free riding is a tremendous discount, and we are in an era of mass communication, and no defense against sophism.
Source date (UTC): 2018-05-03 09:05:00 UTC