Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-27 12:38:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. (ANSWER TO A “BAIT POST” – BTW: I BLOCKED THE

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (ANSWER TO A “BAIT POST” – BTW: I BLOCKED THE INDIVIDUAL WHO REQUESTED IT.)

    SOME RADICAL LEFTIST ASKED ME HOW PROPERTARIANISM WOULD JUDGE HITLER’S GERMANY’S RELOCATION POLICY

    It was a dishonest attempt to bait hate speech. I don’t do hate speech. Ever. I do Science and Natural Law.

    Here is the Answer:

    (a) That high trust is nearly exclusive to the germanic and Japanese peoples, and is their civilization’s competitive advantage.
    (b) That outside of scientific researchers (scientists) non kin shouldn’t cohabitate in the fist place, because it reduces trust, and creates those exact conditions of conflict. (The upper intellectual classes are more autistic and less dependent upon collective for information, and the lower classes the opposite).
    (c) That peoples that specialize in rent seeking and profiting from moral hazard in particular shouldn’t be hosted (any more than those dependent upon begging and thievery) because it leads to prosecution, persecution, and at times, extermination – as well as destroying trust and raising costs of policing the commons.
    (d) That peoples who practice separatism of any kind shouldn’t be tolerated by host societies for those same reasons.
    (e) That this process of separation, if pursued, should be legislated with a multi-year timeline, later prosecuted for non-compliance, and then subject to Hoppe’s “Forcible Removal”.
    (f) That the original relocation model, taken from the Soviet Relocations, had been successful there, and truthfully, throughout all human history.
    (g) That the combination of relocation (forcible removal) and a nearly impossible war was unmanageable. And that they could not fund both. Had they not been pressured by Russia into war, they would have succeeded.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-27 12:36:02 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. —“The optimum age for fertility for women b

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    —“The optimum age for fertility for women begins at the age of 18 but a woman is at her most fertile during her early 20s and there is the lowest risk of miscarriage (9.5% between ages 20 and 24 and 10% between ages 25 and 29).”—

    I love that eastern european women have children early.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-27 12:24:17 UTC

  • Artificial wombs? Every man would have as many sons as he can afford. 😉

    Artificial wombs? Every man would have as many sons as he can afford. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-27 11:54:00 UTC

  • WHEN YOU TOLD ME IT COULN’T HAPPEN? VIA RASUMSSEN Wednesday, June 27, 2018 “That

    https://propertarianism.com/2017/11/01/cooperation-is-only-useful-until-it-is-not/https://propertarianism.com/2017/11/01/cooperation-is-only-useful-until-it-is-not/REMEMBER WHEN YOU TOLD ME IT COULN’T HAPPEN?

    VIA RASUMSSEN

    Wednesday, June 27, 2018

    “That which appears inconceivable is merely a function of the determinacy of human behavior and the ignorance of the incentives”

    —“Thirty-one percent (31%) of Likely U.S. Voters say it’s likely that the United States will experience a second civil war sometime in the next five years, with 11% who say it’s Very Likely. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 59% consider a second civil war unlikely, but that includes only 29% who say it’s Not At All Likely. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

    Democrats (37%) are more fearful than Republicans (32%) and voters not affiliated with either major party (26%) that a second civil war is at hand.

    But 59% of all voters are concerned that those opposed to President Trump’s policies will resort to violence, with 33% who are Very Concerned. This compares to 53% and 28% respectively in the spring of Obama’s second year in office. Thirty-seven percent (37%) don’t share that concern, including 16% who are Not At All Concerned.

    Fifty-three percent (53%) are concerned that those critical of the media’s coverage of Trump will resort to violence, with 24% who are Very Concerned. Forty-two percent (42%) are not concerned about violence from media opponents, including 17% who are Not At All Concerned.”—

    “REVOLUTION IS ALWAYS SUSPECT IN PROSPECT BUT DETERMINISTIC IN RETROSPECT”

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-27 11:46:00 UTC

  • WHEN YOU TOLD ME IT COULN’T HAPPEN? VIA RASUMSSEN Wednesday, June 27, 2018 “That

    https://propertarianism.com/2017/11/01/cooperation-is-only-useful-until-it-is-not/REMEMBER WHEN YOU TOLD ME IT COULN’T HAPPEN?

    VIA RASUMSSEN

    Wednesday, June 27, 2018

    “That which appears inconceivable is merely a function of the determinacy of human behavior and the ignorance of the incentives”

    —“Thirty-one percent (31%) of Likely U.S. Voters say it’s likely that the United States will experience a second civil war sometime in the next five years, with 11% who say it’s Very Likely. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 59% consider a second civil war unlikely, but that includes only 29% who say it’s Not At All Likely. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

    Democrats (37%) are more fearful than Republicans (32%) and voters not affiliated with either major party (26%) that a second civil war is at hand.

    But 59% of all voters are concerned that those opposed to President Trump’s policies will resort to violence, with 33% who are Very Concerned. This compares to 53% and 28% respectively in the spring of Obama’s second year in office. Thirty-seven percent (37%) don’t share that concern, including 16% who are Not At All Concerned.

    Fifty-three percent (53%) are concerned that those critical of the media’s coverage of Trump will resort to violence, with 24% who are Very Concerned. Forty-two percent (42%) are not concerned about violence from media opponents, including 17% who are Not At All Concerned.”—

    “REVOLUTION IS ALWAYS SUSPECT IN PROSPECT BUT DETERMINISTIC IN RETROSPECT”

    https://propertarianism.com/2017/11/01/cooperation-is-only-useful-until-it-is-not/

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-27 11:46:00 UTC

  • “Those who don’t take the red pill willingly will have it shoved down their thro

    —“Those who don’t take the red pill willingly will have it shoved down their throat by reality any way.”—Steve Pender

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-27 11:37:00 UTC

  • SOME ARTICLES ON FEMALE REPRODUCTION Shorter Women = More Estrogen, More Childre

    SOME ARTICLES ON FEMALE REPRODUCTION

    Shorter Women = More Estrogen, More Children.

    https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn2667-short-women-more-successful-with-men/

    More Children = Longer Life … All The Way to 14!

    https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/health-care/item/11012-women-with-more-children-live-longer

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-27 10:39:00 UTC

  • “With the animals we share the passions and the appetites. But the human is dist

    —“With the animals we share the passions and the appetites.

    But the human is distinguished by his volitional ability to override the animal passions and appetites with the dictates perceived through our sense of reason.

    Will our volition be slave to the passions? Or can we override those passions and act according to reason when reason and passion conflict?

    This is the measure of our internal sovereignty.

    “—Zachary Miller

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-27 10:29:00 UTC

  • “Anthropomorphism, attributing human qualities to animals, could be more accurat

    —“Anthropomorphism, attributing human qualities to animals, could be more accurately described as reifying animalistic qualities to the status of “human”. We are mostly animal…some more so than others.”—Bill Joslin

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-27 10:27:00 UTC