Source: Facebook

  • NATURAL LAW ON RACIAL PROFILING IN UNIVERSITIES —-”Is it appropriate to racially

    NATURAL LAW ON RACIAL PROFILING IN UNIVERSITIES

    —-”Is it appropriate to racially profile college applicants to promote diversity in admissions?”—-

    If we use exclusively meritocratic entry, and domestic-only entry, then we aren’t harming anyone in the polity because of their race.

    If we use profiling (discriminatory) entry, and include international entry, then we **are harming** people in the polity because of their race.

    The only moral (meaning reciprocal) and non-harmful method of allowing profiling (discrimination) is to allow (create) segregated (race-limited) universities.

    So we are just (reciprocal, moral) **only** when we have EITHER of the two conditions:

    (a) domestic merit only, or we have

    (b) discrimination and voluntary association and disassociation (race – limited universities.)

    And the current condition is harmful, immoral, unethical, and a violation of natural law of reciprocity.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 12:38:00 UTC

  • HAPPENS WHEN THE PARASITES ARE REMOVED? by Luke Weinhagen What happens to the fe

    http://anepigone.blogspot.com/…/among-whiteshttp://anepigone.blogspot.com/…/among-whitesWHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE PARASITES ARE REMOVED?

    by Luke Weinhagen

    What happens to the fertility rate of the producers when the cost of the parasites is reduced and the traitors are removed.

    The big threat is internal. It is comprised of the parasites leaching the value from the producers and the traitors opening the gates from within.

    Some might see the vectors of populations in the chart above as a catastrophe. Pause that alarm for a moment and look deeper. It may instead be a badly needed, healthy and natural purge.

    If the data below is even close to accurate, rate of change depicted in the chart above may be reason to celebrate –

    Fertility Rate for Political Orientation (whites)

    =================================

    Extremely liberal (2.5%) — 1.61

    Liberal (12.7%) — 1.72

    Slightly liberal (11.3%) — 1.58

    Moderate (39.9%) — 2.14

    Slightly conservative (15.6%) — 2.03

    Conservative (14.3%) — 2.34

    Extremely conservative (3.7%) — 2.62

    Imagine what happens to the fertility rate of the producers when the cost of the parasites is reduced and the traitors are removed.

    (CURT: Depends upon the moderates.About 1/3 is conservative. If given the choice the moderates – a bit more than a third maybe – we might get a good polity. It’s by dumping the left we get all the gains. And look at a future where the underclass AND some of the working class are unemployable….)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 12:24:00 UTC

  • HAPPENS WHEN THE PARASITES ARE REMOVED? by Luke Weinhagen What happens to the fe

    http://anepigone.blogspot.com/…/among-whitesWHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE PARASITES ARE REMOVED?

    by Luke Weinhagen

    What happens to the fertility rate of the producers when the cost of the parasites is reduced and the traitors are removed.

    The big threat is internal. It is comprised of the parasites leaching the value from the producers and the traitors opening the gates from within.

    Some might see the vectors of populations in the chart above as a catastrophe. Pause that alarm for a moment and look deeper. It may instead be a badly needed, healthy and natural purge.

    If the data below is even close to accurate, rate of change depicted in the chart above may be reason to celebrate –

    Fertility Rate for Political Orientation (whites)

    =================================

    Extremely liberal (2.5%) — 1.61

    Liberal (12.7%) — 1.72

    Slightly liberal (11.3%) — 1.58

    Moderate (39.9%) — 2.14

    Slightly conservative (15.6%) — 2.03

    Conservative (14.3%) — 2.34

    Extremely conservative (3.7%) — 2.62

    Imagine what happens to the fertility rate of the producers when the cost of the parasites is reduced and the traitors are removed.

    (CURT: Depends upon the moderates.About 1/3 is conservative. If given the choice the moderates – a bit more than a third maybe – we might get a good polity. It’s by dumping the left we get all the gains. And look at a future where the underclass AND some of the working class are unemployable….)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 12:24:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. —“In 21st century. We must make world safe

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    —“In 21st century. We must make world safe FROM democracy.”—Jaromír MiÅ¡kovský


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 12:19:06 UTC

  • “The irony is that it is only through a profound amount of liberalism coupled wi

    —“The irony is that it is only through a profound amount of liberalism coupled with ideological courage that Curt Doolittle is able to diagnose a variety of issues with great accuracy.

    But [your prescription] sounds more like radical leftism repackaged. And though there might be some deterministic accuracy to the rise of radicalism in both forms (ends of the political spectrum), I personally would only die for one cause – individual liberty 🗽

    And history shows that this ideology (liberty) is closer to the broader human spirit than accidental ethnic relationships devoid of spirit and culture (real culture).

    Your worldview is self defeating in that your own ideas could have never come to fruition with the your vision of the future. (I do recognize that referring to yourself in such a way disarms the oppositions narrative) but at what cost?”—Rob Ellerman


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 12:16:00 UTC

  • (Yes. You can PM me. I’m not scary. I don’t have time for idle ‘friendly’ chat,

    (Yes. You can PM me. I’m not scary. I don’t have time for idle ‘friendly’ chat, but I will help with questions. OK? Respect for my time is nice. Timidity in pursuit of wisdom isn’t helpful for anyone.)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 11:56:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 11:52:16 UTC

  • SEPARATION IS ENOUGH OF A SOLUTION —“Overt action is not always needful for th

    SEPARATION IS ENOUGH OF A SOLUTION

    —“Overt action is not always needful for the drastic removal of lower organisms. Very often, if left alone, degenerates cremate themselves. If given control of governmental mechanisms, they immediately commence to grind one another into mincemeat (that is to say, into dividends)” — Redbeard

    (via Brandon Hayes)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 10:55:00 UTC

  • WHAT IS NATURAL LAW? >A fully decidable (universal) Law of Ethics. What do you m

    WHAT IS NATURAL LAW?

    >A fully decidable (universal) Law of Ethics.

    What do you mean by ethics?

    >The law of cooperation and conflict resolution.

    What is this law of cooperation and conflict resolution?

    >Reciprocity.

    WHAT IS RECIPROCITY?

    In the Negative (Silver Rule, or via-negativa): The requirement to avoid the imposition of costs on that which others have born costs to obtain an interest in, without imposing costs upon that which others have likewise born costs to obtain an interest in.

    In the Positive(Golden Rule, or via-positiva): the requirement that we limit our actions to productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfers, free of the imposition of costs by externality, upon that which others have obtained by the same means.

    As determined by the either any change, or the total change in the inventory that all parties both internal and external to the action have born costs to obtain an interest without imposition of costs upon others directly or indirectly by externality.

    —“All of ethics can be reduced to [is a subset/special application of] the degree of reciprocity & the accounting thereof.— James Augustus

    WHY DOES RECIPROCITY SERVE AS NATURAL LAW?

    Because it is apparently impossible to contradict reciprocity in cooperation (ethics), and as such it provides perfect decidability in all contexts of cooperation at all scales in all times, and under all conditions.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 10:50:00 UTC

  • NATURAL LAW FOR CHRISTIANS (repost from 09 Monday Oct 2017) Natural Law: I have

    NATURAL LAW FOR CHRISTIANS

    (repost from 09 Monday Oct 2017)

    Natural Law:

    I have no idea what these men think natural law refers to, but in CAN only refer to Reciprocity. Every other reference is just an excuse for parasitism or predation by moral pretense.

    Revelation:

    The knowledge gained through the sciences (physical, physiological, natural-meaning cooperative, and testimonial(meaning knowable)) as a means of achieving agency in the universe.

    God:

    God is a unit of measure. God is a fictional (mythical) character (archetype) within a group’s mythology, that in turn expresses the group’s evolutionary strategy (geographic, demographic, economic, political norm, tradition, and religion), that when used through imaginary role play, functions as a an instrument of measurement (decidability), for those (many) circumstances, and for those (many uneducated) people, who must decide in the face of complexity, undecidability, or uncertainty, when the consequences of our actions (externalities, particularly intertemporal and long term externalities) are beyond our ability to judge. Sympathy with an authority figure is the simplest form of measurement available to man other than his own physical abilities to act. Sympathy, particularly with a paternal or maternal figure, is the first cooperative form of measurement man evolved, and the one that requires no specific education other than ordinary social participation, in order to function.

    THE BASIC PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL LAW THOUGHT

    1. Natural law is an eternal moral law revealed to all people through human nature.

    Correction:

    The Natural Law of reciprocity is necessary for the preservation of cooperation, for any cooperative species – particularly a sentient one. Without the natural law of reciprocity, and the moral intuitions that accompany it, including altruistic punishment, then cooperation would not survive, and the population would not survive. Conversely, the more cooperation, the more contract, the more truth, the more trust, the lower the cost and the greater velocity of that cooperation. And as such, the greater prosperity.

    2. Natural law influences (but cannot save) even fallen and sinful humanity.

    Correction:

    Man evolved as a rational actor, and must have evolved as a rational actor, in order to survive. Man acts rationally at all times given his incentives. He developed defense of his investments (possessions, and opportunities) before he developed cooperation. He developed moral instinct in parallel with his ability to cooperate, and language to improve his ability to cooperate. But while predation, parasitism, theft, fraud, and free riding and conspiracy are all natural to man – and universally demonstrated, it is simply almost always more advantageous to cooperate than not, or to engage in parasitism, or predation. And even so, we have developed systems of providing incentives against man’s rational choice of non-cooperation, parasitism, and predation, both informal (manners, ethics, morals, traditions) and formal (laws, enforcers, and governments). Man is not fallen angel but risen beast. That is simply the fact of it. He is rational – not good or bad, that is simply the fact of it. We all simply work to keep one another ethical, moral, and powerless so that it is always more rational to cooperate.

    3. Natural law is the proper basis of political authority.

    Correction:

    The Natural Law of Reciprocity provides perfect decidability in matters of conflict. Reciprocity provides perfect decidability in matters of cooperation and exchange. Reciprocity provides perfect decidability in matters of the production of commons. Reciprocity provides perfect decidability in international agreement and conflict. Ergo, the Natural Law of Reciprocity provides the ONLY perfectly decidable means of dispute resolution, cooperation and exchange, production of commons, and international agreement and conflict.

    4. Natural law authorizes society to establish a government.

    Correction:

    Natural Law of Reciprocity informs us that we require a judiciary to adjudicate differences, and markets to cooperate. Forming a political order (government) to do so on behalf of the population is a choice. But since all governments have been corrupt (especially the church), the price of government (management team for the commons), must be weighed against the benefit of one.

    5. Governments are themselves subject to the natural law.

    Correction:

    Governments do not exist any more than god exists. Only people exist. A government consists only of people. And all people either observe the Natural Law of Reciprocity, and are held accountable by the rest of the population, for adhering to the Natural Law of Reciprocity, or they don’t. If they don’t, then they should expect retaliation for their crimes against the natural law of reciprocity, and therefore the polity.

    6. Each society’s laws should apply the natural law to that society’s particular circumstances.

    Correction:

    Each society may create contracts under natural law that both preserve aggregate reciprocity but create combinations of rights and duties. But no, the natural law of reciprocity is no more violable than is the balance scale. Either the two weights balance, and reciprocity is preserved, or it does not balance and reciprocity is not preserved. Period.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 10:46:00 UTC