Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • photos_and_videos/your_posts/37188214_10156495272982264_8153095894980362240_n_10

    photos_and_videos/your_posts/37188214_10156495272982264_8153095894980362240_n_10

    photos_and_videos/your_posts/37188214_10156495272982264_8153095894980362240_n_10156495272977264.jpg GOOD START – NOT AMBITIOUS ENOUGH. ;)Cary MorrisGood teeth. Definitely not carb/sugar eaters.Jul 14, 2018 9:43amSkye StewartUnrelated, but does not this seem mistaken to you,

    https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1017403089890902016Jul 14, 2018 9:51amJames SantagataThere’s always a dentist in the crowd. lolJul 14, 2018 9:55amCurt DoolittleTWEETED REPONSE

    Um. Let me help y’all. It’s COSTS. For libertarians especially, and conservatives in general, interpersonal connections come at higher costs. These web sites effectively suggest that they offer opportunities at lower interpersonal COST. (All behavior is cost driven & costs vary.)Jul 14, 2018 10:00amCJ Vandal[A glass of scotch swirls slowly in the distance]Jul 14, 2018 10:51amWillem O’BrienI want a throne made of thoseJul 14, 2018 11:19amWilliam Douglas HamiltonI prefer heads preserved in formaldehyde jars tbqh famJul 14, 2018 11:28amCurt DoolittleIt’s oK. you can bring your lunch if you want to. ;)Jul 14, 2018 11:31amWillem O’BrienFormaldehyde smells like SHIT fam

    Makes me pass out too I swear it wasnt the dead bodies hahaJul 14, 2018 11:33amTim SpillanePic related.Jul 14, 2018 11:50amNoah J RevoyLook, its a liberty mountain.Jul 14, 2018 12:00pmCurt DoolittleNoah J Revoy omg that’s funnyJul 14, 2018 12:03pmTim SpillaneWell the Aztecs were certainly ambitious, though it seems they may have been going after the wrong people: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOz7a2oEgrQJul 14, 2018 12:07pmTim KhilWe need buildings of reinforced skullcreteJul 14, 2018 5:29pmAndrew Clayton*winning*Jul 15, 2018 3:54amGOOD START – NOT AMBITIOUS ENOUGH. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 09:17:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/37188214_10156495272982264_81530958

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/37188214_10156495272982264_81530958

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/37188214_10156495272982264_8153095894980362240_n_10156495272977264.jpg GOOD START – NOT AMBITIOUS ENOUGH. ;)Cary MorrisGood teeth. Definitely not carb/sugar eaters.Jul 14, 2018 9:43amSkye StewartUnrelated, but does not this seem mistaken to you,

    https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1017403089890902016Jul 14, 2018 9:51amJames SantagataThere’s always a dentist in the crowd. lolJul 14, 2018 9:55amCurt DoolittleTWEETED REPONSE

    Um. Let me help y’all. It’s COSTS. For libertarians especially, and conservatives in general, interpersonal connections come at higher costs. These web sites effectively suggest that they offer opportunities at lower interpersonal COST. (All behavior is cost driven & costs vary.)Jul 14, 2018 10:00amCJ Vandal[A glass of scotch swirls slowly in the distance]Jul 14, 2018 10:51amWilliam Douglas HamiltonI prefer heads preserved in formaldehyde jars tbqh famJul 14, 2018 11:28amCurt DoolittleIt’s oK. you can bring your lunch if you want to. ;)Jul 14, 2018 11:31amTim SpillanePic related.Jul 14, 2018 11:50amNoah J RevoyLook, its a liberty mountain.Jul 14, 2018 12:00pmCurt Doolittle@[1749340484:2048:Noah J Revoy] omg that’s funnyJul 14, 2018 12:03pmTim SpillaneWell the Aztecs were certainly ambitious, though it seems they may have been going after the wrong people: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOz7a2oEgrQJul 14, 2018 12:07pmTim KhilWe need buildings of reinforced skullcreteJul 14, 2018 5:29pmAndrew Clayton*winning*Jul 15, 2018 3:54amGOOD START – NOT AMBITIOUS ENOUGH. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 09:17:00 UTC

  • (skull pyramid humor) >Julian Gerull If you have enemies, you will be bitter 😉

    (skull pyramid humor)

    >Julian Gerull

    If you have enemies, you will be bitter 😉

    >Jorn Birx

    Better to be bitter and enduring than content into oblivion.

    >Daniel Roland Anderson

    That’s why we stack skulls in pyramids.

    It’s part of an “outside the box” wellness program.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 08:32:00 UTC

  • LANGUAGE CAUSES OVERESTIMATION OF SIMILARITIES We all have a will to power, but

    LANGUAGE CAUSES OVERESTIMATION OF SIMILARITIES

    We all have a will to power, but we also have physical, mental, and emotional resources to obtain it with; and that will is countered by fear and insecurity.

    Language is as natural as walking. But it causes us to overestimate our similarities. Empathy causes us to overestimate our similarities. Submission causes us to overestimate our similarities. Need causes us to overestimate our similarities. And a host of our cognitive biases evolved to convince us we are normal, or average, or like everyone else. But despite all those cognitive biases, we are demonstrably not all that similar in MARGINAL difference in the performance of emotional, cognitive, and physical tasks.

    We can often judge someone’s ability by their vocabulary and their reasoning – language is how we measure (diagnose) the mind. But the fact that we can speak to people across the human spectrum tells us nothing about our marginal (effective) differences.

    In fact, those cognitive biases for similarity(indifference) may be nothing other than an adaptation to the use of language, by providing us with greater imitation(of actions), sympathy(for wants), and empathy(for feelings), so that we more readily comprehend one another’s use of language so that in turn we may more readily reap the rewards of opportunities for the high returns on cooperation.

    The more Empathic, Sympathetic, Needful, and Vulnerable we are, the more incentive we have to find similarities (female) and the Dispassionate, Analytic, Independent, and Dominant we are the more incentive we have to identify and preserve our dissimilarities.

    Now think about that a little bit.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 08:22:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. —“Dunbar’s Number is a suggested cognitive

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    —“Dunbar’s Number is a suggested cognitive limit to the number of people with whom one can maintain stable social relationships—relationships in which an individual knows who each person is and how each person relates to every other person.”—

    Roman (Wall) 8 men x 10(80) x 6(480) x 10(4800) (legion)
    American (Packs) 10 x 4(40) x 4.x (175) x 4(700) (battalion) x 6.4(4500+) (Brigade)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 18:14:58 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. I grew up in a farm town of 10k people. That’

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    I grew up in a farm town of 10k people. That’s the population of London at the Norman Conquest. Anglo Saxon villages usually consisted of around one hundred people, which is below the 140/150 threshold of Dunbar’s Number.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 17:39:27 UTC

  • THE MOST IMPORTANT MEASURE IS THE EXTRAORDINARY CREATIVITY OF THE OUTLIERS. (I d

    THE MOST IMPORTANT MEASURE IS THE EXTRAORDINARY CREATIVITY OF THE OUTLIERS.

    (I don’t think of myself as smart so much as having this very strange ‘gift’ that I have for patterns that I’ve learned to make very good use of. )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 17:22:46 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. THE COST OF SOVEREIGNTY: EVERY MAN A WARRIOR,

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    THE COST OF SOVEREIGNTY: EVERY MAN A WARRIOR, SHERIFF, INSURER

    —“It’s a bit unclear but let’s say everybody is a free agent and as such free to do what one wants as long as his actions don’t impose additional costs to somebody else…would that be correct..? “—Antonio Simon

    Close, but there is a cost (duty) to pay for such a thing, because free agents are not able to resist opponents, if they are allowed to free ride on the defense of accumulateed and asymmetrically distributed capital.

    Every man a warrior, a sheriff, and reciprocal insurer, and then every man is sovereign, possessing both liberty (capital) and freedom (action and speech).

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 17:03:14 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. NATURAL LAW ON RACIAL PROFILING IN UNIVERSITI

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    NATURAL LAW ON RACIAL PROFILING IN UNIVERSITIES

    —-”Is it appropriate to racially profile college applicants to promote diversity in admissions?”—-

    If we use exclusively meritocratic entry, and domestic-only entry, then we aren’t harming anyone in the polity because of their race.

    If we use profiling (discriminatory) entry, and include international entry, then we **are harming** people in the polity because of their race.

    The only moral (meaning reciprocal) and non-harmful method of allowing profiling (discrimination) is to allow (create) segregated (race-limited) universities.

    So we are just (reciprocal, moral) **only** when we have EITHER of the two conditions:
    (a) domestic merit only, or we have
    (b) discrimination and voluntary association and disassociation (race – limited universities.)

    And the current condition is harmful, immoral, unethical, and a violation of natural law of reciprocity.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 16:38:29 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a link. WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE PARASITES ARE REMOVED? by Lu

    Curt Doolittle shared a link.

    WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE PARASITES ARE REMOVED?
    by Luke Weinhagen

    What happens to the fertility rate of the producers when the cost of the parasites is reduced and the traitors are removed.

    The big threat is internal. It is comprised of the parasites leaching the value from the producers and the traitors opening the gates from within.

    Some might see the vectors of populations in the chart above as a catastrophe. Pause that alarm for a moment and look deeper. It may instead be a badly needed, healthy and natural purge.

    If the data below is even close to accurate, rate of change depicted in the chart above may be reason to celebrate –

    Fertility Rate for Political Orientation (whites)
    =================================
    Extremely liberal (2.5%) — 1.61
    Liberal (12.7%) — 1.72
    Slightly liberal (11.3%) — 1.58
    Moderate (39.9%) — 2.14
    Slightly conservative (15.6%) — 2.03
    Conservative (14.3%) — 2.34
    Extremely conservative (3.7%) — 2.62

    Imagine what happens to the fertility rate of the producers when the cost of the parasites is reduced and the traitors are removed.

    (CURT: Depends upon the moderates.About 1/3 is conservative. If given the choice the moderates – a bit more than a third maybe – we might get a good polity. It’s by dumping the left we get all the gains. And look at a future where the underclass AND some of the working class are unemployable….)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 16:24:20 UTC