Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • East Asian Verbal IQ is ordinary. The entire advantage is mathematical?

    East Asian Verbal IQ is ordinary. The entire advantage is mathematical?

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 16:32:00 UTC

  • THE STANDARD DEVIATION IN IQ IS MISLEADING You know, I’ve tended to follow the c

    THE STANDARD DEVIATION IN IQ IS MISLEADING

    You know, I’ve tended to follow the consensus that 15 points is a standard deviation, in intelligence, but that doesn’t help so much because group standard deviations appear to range from 11 to 13, with 12.5 as the sort of median. Secondly, I’ve followed the convention of the center being 100.

    Both of these are kind of obscuring value.

    1 – the sort of middle between expensive to train and inexpensive to train is actually 106. (I sort of think of human potential beginning in that area.)

    via Lion:

    —“A verbal IQ of about 106 defines the cognitive lower bound of the smart fraction. And, each percentage point increase in the “smart percent” is worth about $600 (1998) to per capita GDP.”—

    2 – Every six points (about half a standard deviation) rather than seven, we see fairly rapid increases in ability.

    3 – They suggest average is sort of 95-105, and that’s true, but that’s the arbitrary average of the population given the population. Instead, I would say the average begins at 105 or 106 (105 for simplicity’s sake), and that we are one half standard deviation below the minimum for the upper half to compensate for the lower. And one standard deviation or 12 points below the low end of the optimum for modernity. And that this minimum will increase from 112 to 118 over the next century (or faster).

    4 – Roughly speaking 1/3 of the population, meaning the vast majority of the population under 95 has to disappear over the next few hundred years.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 15:29:00 UTC

  • “CURT: WHY THE RISE IN NAZBOL?”– (not the russian political party, the modern e

    —“CURT: WHY THE RISE IN NAZBOL?”–

    (not the russian political party, the modern equivalent)

    I think (a) there are three symbols of power to ‘regress’ to:

    1) the soviet/russians/communists,

    2) the nazis,

    3) and the church,

    and that people have given up on the enligthenment. (and the monarchies).

    In the west the church is dead. So we are really left with the two fascisms: authoritarian working class (bolshevism) and authoritarian executive class (naziism).

    I’m in the minority which says that the answer is nationalism and constitutional monarchy under natural law, where we have a judicial cult that prosecutes the parasites and liars until none remain.

    My understanding is that NazBol is a combination of communism and nazism and that it’s reducible to Strasserism. But I am not ‘clued in’ on pop movements.

    —“Strasserism was the strand of Nazism that called for a more radical, mass-action and worker-based form of National Socialism, hostile to Jews not from a racial perspective, but from an anti-capitalist basis, to achieve a national rebirth. It derives its name from Gregor and Otto Strasser, the two Nazi brothers initially associated with this position”—-

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 15:13:00 UTC

  • MAGIC, INDO-EUROPEANS AND THE TAMING OF THE MASSES by Daniel Gurpide (awesome) F

    MAGIC, INDO-EUROPEANS AND THE TAMING OF THE MASSES

    by Daniel Gurpide

    (awesome)

    From an anthropological perspective, traditional magic practices were perfectly adequate to a certain level of development. In this sense, ‘authentic’ magic aims at clarifying a psycho-technique (self-discipline) with a specific goal in mind; it guides man into the appropriate form for a given project. It either prepares man to bear without excessive anxiety the hostile pressures of a universe that he does not yet control, or it helps give free reign to certain instincts and repress others, so that he can accomplish more successfully a certain undertaking.

    With this type of magic, man had learnt to manipulate himself. He had given himself a self-chosen nature, and had succeeded in his hominisation. Hence, authentic magic constitutes the original ‘know-how’ of human self-domestication, and the domestication of the psyche by consciousness, organised by a science that was born through reflection on the know-how of animal nature.

    Magic degenerates as soon as it claims to find application to a relation diverse from the one instituted between consciousness and psyche: that is, between man (as living being) and the world (as event), under the wholly imaginary pretext that the human psyche participates in the cause of that event. It then leads to a cosmological theory that is entirely unfounded. On the other hand, where this reflection allows him to isolate the true terms of the ‘magic relation,’ man acquires an exact description of himself and his circumstances, and of the position he occupies within the living world. He transforms himself, from then on, into the domesticator of the living world.

    Hundreds of thousands of years after hominisation, it was with the Indoeuropean/Neolithic Revolution that another type of man emerges. Having learned what ‘moves’ himself, man tries now to ‘move’ animals and plants according to his wishes and needs. As far as social animals are concerned, he intends to take on a directive role, becoming the leader of the pack. Similarly, having attained a superior consciousness—thanks to the correct understanding of magic—he presents himself as aristocracy in relation to the rest of society and affirms his own sovereignty.

    With the advent of Indoeuropeans, man’s taming of the living world occurred in parallel to the taming of the mass—by the elite. Hereafter, ‚religion‘ comes to be the ideological system that will serve to ‘tie fast’ society and subject the group to a certain influence.

    (from Curt: Man began domestication of man, just as he had domesticated Fire, Metal, Plant, and Animal. That is the meaning of aristocracy: parenting (domesticating) the animal (lacking agency) man. )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 15:06:00 UTC

  • WHAT IF AMERICA BECOMES INSULAR AGAIN? —-“What do Europeans, Canadians, Austra

    WHAT IF AMERICA BECOMES INSULAR AGAIN?

    —-“What do Europeans, Canadians, Australians and other western societies think of what is happening politically in America right now? Is there fear for the future should the USA become insular once again?”— Quora User

    We Americans are going to do everything we can to end imperial postwar America, end the remains of the British empire, and return to the balance of power system, where we are not responsible for financing and policing the ‘uncivilized world’.

    We are pretty tired of europeans, austrialians and canadians in particular from signaling moral superiority when the are just free riders on the military financial cultural and political costs born by american peoples.

    So if you mean by ‘insular’ we are no longer going to tolerate your virtue signaling, paying for your military defense, the world financial system, the world political system, and being the dumping ground for immigrants, yeah, insular means ‘no more free rides for people who disrespect you for having given them the ride’.

    Canada, like Sweden is on the way to making itself the middle east.

    Parts of america are on the way to making themselves brazil.

    England is on it’s way to making itself north africa,

    And france already is north africa.

    You don’t get diversity with diversity. You get underclass monopoly. All states that try turn in to poor countries with corrupt governments and some sort of stated or unstated caste system

    You can diversity from NATION STATES where every people pays the cost of carrying their own development, and particularly of their underclasses.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 13:07:00 UTC

  • “DO WHITE MEN FIND WOMEN OUTSIDE THEIR RACE ATTRACTIVE?”— (This seems like a v

    —“DO WHITE MEN FIND WOMEN OUTSIDE THEIR RACE ATTRACTIVE?”—

    (This seems like a very strange question. lol All women are attractive – especially at 19-23 years. It’s the whole point of being female. 😉 )

    THE CORRECT ANSWER

    Let me help you: **We are men**. **Every woman** that is healthy, and reasonably fit, and reasonably symmetrical (height weight proportionate) is attractive. (Just as every men who can garner attention from others and who possesses some wealth is attractive to women. supermodels and men in professional sports, or attractive professional women and wealthy entrepreneurs. Same everywhere. )

    DIFFERENCES IN THE FREQUENCY OF DESIRABLE FEATURES

    Of the *major* races and subraces ( african, semitic, iranic, western, indian, eastern, pacific) we vary greatly in our degree of neoteny (retention of childhood traits) that are associated with fertility (and desirability) for no other reason than the geography we evolved in – with cold favoring neoteny, and hot, not so. So some races tend to have more FREQUENTLY desirable features than other races while all races tend to produce some desirable women. (The aboriginals in australia have a low frequency of those traits, and east-slavic women have a high frequency of those traits. with celtic, german, and scandinavian women having a lower frequency than slavic women, but producing more extremes.)

    DEGREES OF NEOTENY DUE TO REGIONS

    The reason being that the desire for neoteny is high across all populations. East asians have the most neoteny but perhaps too much which is why the asymmetric demand for asian women vs men. Westerners have less morophlogical neoteny, and tend to retain higher demand for females than males in appearance, even if higher demand for males in behavior. This is true for indians as well. For Iranic and semitic the demand is lower for both males and females becuase of greater retention of sexual depth and maturity. And africans mature the fastest and the deepest, because they are in the most biologically hostile part of the world where children must mature quickly or die.

    PRACTICALITY

    We men are also **practical**: marrying within six degrees is ALWAYS better than the alternative for every possible reason, unless your own sexual market value is too low within six degrees.

    (Lastly, and … unpleasantly perhaps, white men (although they will not admit it openly) operate under the belief that ‘women from lower classes’ are ‘cheaper and easier and require less effort’. I don’t actually think this is true. I think it’s just that in-group sensitivity to rejection is higher.)

    OUTMARRIAGE RATES

    So what we find in the west is about 15% outmarriage (racial mixture) with predictable overlap between black-hispanic, hispanic-white, white-asian, and asian-jewish populations. the reason being that at the top and bottom of each ‘tribe’, a ‘defector’ can obtain a higher sexual market value outside his or her group.

    How do we know this? You wouldn’t believe how many people study this stuff and how exceptionally good that the data is – especially from all the dating sites.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 12:44:00 UTC

  • THE SECRET TO JEWISH SUCCESS: EXTREME FEMINISM THE CORRECT ANSWER Jews have, mor

    THE SECRET TO JEWISH SUCCESS: EXTREME FEMINISM

    THE CORRECT ANSWER

    Jews have, more successfully than all other peoples, and somewhat by accident of selective upward redistribution of reproduction, transferred feminine cognitive ability (language and perception) to the males, and male cognitive ability(agency) to females, at the cost of higher rates of homosexuality and mental illness, and lower rates of creativity. (yes, really) This ‘blending’ of traits combines the best of both worlds.

    The mistake is to think that they are necessarily more exceptional than our most exceptional whites (Anglicans). Anglicans produce higher average IQ. But the Jews produce more outliers because of a wider standard deviation in their distributions. And they practice nepotism on a scale that westerners can’t imagine – the same way women advance their children.

    There is quite a bit of work studying these things now. So it’s getting much easier to explain the differences. I try to explain Jewish behavior by saying “all Jews are female” and while that’s an exaggeration it does explain the entirety of Jewish success: adopting the female cognitive, collective, and reproductive strategy.

    This is probably the most explanatory argument available today.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 11:42:00 UTC

  • IT ISN’T COMPLICATED: How simple does it need to be? Sovereignty requires Insura

    IT ISN’T COMPLICATED:

    How simple does it need to be? Sovereignty requires Insurance, requires Reciprocity, requires Truth, produces Law, limits us to Markets, produces competition, produces goods, services, and information as a means of survival.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 11:35:00 UTC

  • WE GOT WHAT WE LET HOSTILE PEOPLES ASK FOR We are at war. A very nearly hot civi

    WE GOT WHAT WE LET HOSTILE PEOPLES ASK FOR

    We are at war. A very nearly hot civil war. A civil war brought about by design, beginning in the postwar period, and one that would not have succeeded in overthrow except for underclass, and particularly Hispanic immigration. All liberal societies pursue commercial interests to the point of undermining the society. This is what separates military (armies) states from trading (naval) states: armies do not tolerate imposition of costs upon the civic order.

    When at war, people demand generals. And every single time any civilization has pursued liberalism to the point where they undermine the homogeneity of the population they have died at the hands of conflicts btween despots.

    Becuase only a despot can rule over competing peoples.

    And we now have at least four hostile demographics in at lesat ten culturally separate regions.

    You get what you ask for.

    We got what we let HOSTILE PEOPLES ask for.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 11:15:00 UTC

  • You still don’t get it. Monotheistic Religion was developed as a means of underm

    You still don’t get it. Monotheistic Religion was developed as a means of undermining the Indo European World Aristocracy, by providing a competitor to truth, duty, and nation.

    And it works.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-26 10:48:00 UTC