Curt Doolittle

Source: Facebook

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/42345150_10156655144047264_77590979

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/42345150_10156655144047264_7759097933370228736_o_10156655144042264.jpg Note that all groups are split other than homo sapiens.

    There are at least three and arguably four species of homo sapiens.

    There was a movement to group humans and chimpanzees but chimps and bonobos can interbreed, and Europeans, East asians, and africans can interbreed.Jamie RobinsonI say theres 3 and a missing link, but scientist dont want to talk…..Sep 22, 2018 4:04pmBrandon Beej JohnsonI think the races are more the result of interbreeding with other hominids resulting in hybrid species than they are totally other races naturally divergent from a single stock of homo sapiens.

    This is supported by the presence of genetic admixtures of other hominids in different racial groups.

    The negroid, for example, I believe gets it’s distinct differences from the rest of humans because that portion of sapiens mixed with hiedelbergensis, erectus, and an unknown variant of erectus, primitive hominids with smaller brains and darker features adapted to sub-saharan africa.Sep 22, 2018 4:33pmMatthew GenackThere needs to be much more research in this area.Sep 22, 2018 6:41pmJim WaltersHave you all heard these commercials stating we are all 98% the same? Well we share about 50% of our DNA with a banana. Does that make the banana family too?Sep 23, 2018 11:37amJohn MarkNothing scares a leftist more than the truth.Sep 25, 2018 11:06amNote that all groups are split other than homo sapiens.

    There are at least three and arguably four species of homo sapiens.

    There was a movement to group humans and chimpanzees but chimps and bonobos can interbreed, and Europeans, East asians, and africans can interbreed.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-22 13:44:00 UTC

  • “The whole West faces the double problem of a violent, dependent underclass and

    —“The whole West faces the double problem of a violent, dependent underclass and a parasitical, exploitative oligarchy controlling business and politics.”—Ryan Williams

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-22 13:31:00 UTC

  • The hard thing to swallow is the lack of agency of all but a few. The rest are j

    The hard thing to swallow is the lack of agency of all but a few. The rest are just gene machines, riders of propaganda on an elephant of r-biased genes.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-22 13:30:00 UTC

  • Our Women Were Recruited and Defected Again, Just as Under Christianity. Fool us

    Our Women Were Recruited and Defected Again, Just as Under Christianity.

    Fool us once, shame on them. Fool us twice, shame on us.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-22 13:28:00 UTC

  • CURT IS LIVE ON DISCORD FOR PROPERTARIANISM RELATED AMA

    CURT IS LIVE ON DISCORD FOR PROPERTARIANISM RELATED AMA.

    https://discord.gg/tgmey3

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-22 13:21:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/42289745_10156655080157264_376604294

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/42289745_10156655080157264_3766042941080993792_n_10156655080152264.jpg Jesse Van SteelandtAre the indo Europeans of India of the same stock as the Pashtuns from Pakistan and Afghanistan? Caucasoid or not, they are still a fairly violent/degenerate people.Sep 22, 2018, 1:14 PMԴավիդ ՎելլաThe Pashtuns are a hotch potch of tribal raiders of Iranic and possibly also Turkic descentSep 22, 2018, 1:19 PMJesse Van SteelandtGo on….Sep 22, 2018, 1:23 PMLan KenWhat’s your take on Dravidians?Sep 22, 2018, 1:59 PMGöran DahlThey’re different from each other. Pashtuns have a lot more Iran_Neolithic than Indians, who also have Onge-like ancestry and East Asian ancestry. High caste Indians and Pashtuns have similar levels of actual Indo-European ancestry, but the Pashtuns still beat them by a small margin.Sep 22, 2018, 2:26 PMCurt DoolittleDon’t really have one.Sep 22, 2018, 2:49 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-22 13:03:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/42289745_10156655080157264_376604294

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/42289745_10156655080157264_3766042941080993792_n_10156655080152264.jpg Jesse Van SteelandtAre the indo Europeans of India of the same stock as the Pashtuns from Pakistan and Afghanistan? Caucasoid or not, they are still a fairly violent/degenerate people.Sep 22, 2018, 1:14 PMJesse Van SteelandtGo on….Sep 22, 2018, 1:23 PMLance KennedyWhat’s your take on Dravidians?Sep 22, 2018, 1:59 PMGöran DahlThey’re different from each other. Pashtuns have a lot more Iran_Neolithic than Indians, who also have Onge-like ancestry and East Asian ancestry. High caste Indians and Pashtuns have similar levels of actual Indo-European ancestry, but the Pashtuns still beat them by a small margin.Sep 22, 2018, 2:26 PMCurt DoolittleDon’t really have one.Sep 22, 2018, 2:49 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-22 13:03:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/42289745_10156655080157264_37660429

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/42289745_10156655080157264_3766042941080993792_n_10156655080152264.jpg Jesse Van SteelandtAre the indo Europeans of India of the same stock as the Pashtuns from Pakistan and Afghanistan? Caucasoid or not, they are still a fairly violent/degenerate people.Sep 22, 2018 1:14pmDawid WellaThe Pashtuns are a hotch potch of tribal raiders of Iranic and possibly also Turkic descentSep 22, 2018 1:19pmJesse Van SteelandtGo on….Sep 22, 2018 1:23pmLance KennedyWhat’s your take on Dravidians?Sep 22, 2018 1:59pmGöran DahlThey’re different from each other. Pashtuns have a lot more Iran_Neolithic than Indians, who also have Onge-like ancestry and East Asian ancestry. High caste Indians and Pashtuns have similar levels of actual Indo-European ancestry, but the Pashtuns still beat them by a small margin.Sep 22, 2018 2:26pmCurt DoolittleDon’t really have one.Sep 22, 2018 2:49pm

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-22 13:03:00 UTC

  • BIG FAMILIES ARE NOT REALLY DIFFICULT by Nick Bailey —“Big families actually a

    BIG FAMILIES ARE NOT REALLY DIFFICULT

    by Nick Bailey

    —“Big families actually aren’t as much of a pain as the (((news media))) portrays. I had a carseat/stroller combo that lasted through the first 5 kids. I had 5 sons in a row, so baby clothes just got saved and passed to the next kid for years. Eventually, the workload of dealing with the younger kids gets spread out among both parents and the older kids. Feeding them is cheap if you just make one-pot meals at home.

    The first kid is the most expensive. Each one after that is generally less expensive, especially once you realize you don’t need all the stuff the ‘experts’ say you need. Good medical insurance is an absolute must, though.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-22 13:02:00 UTC

  • ANOTHER TAKE ON INDIAN ORIGINS by Mark Lanzarotta, The ancestors of the Dravidia

    ANOTHER TAKE ON INDIAN ORIGINS

    by Mark Lanzarotta,

    The ancestors of the Dravidians, the Proto-Elamites, originated from a Zarzian (Nostratic) migration from the Zagros Mountains to Turkmenistan around 13,000 BC. They were driven from there in 8000 BC by Proto-Sumerians from the Altais and fled to Iran, where they gave rise to the Elamites, among others. They began to drift into India around 7000 BC and wrested it from the Nihalis (the new arrivals started the Mehrgarh civilization, a blend of Dravidians and native Nihalis). The Mundas didn’t exist yet, they came from Yunnan later. The Dravidians married the Australoid indigenes and became quite dark, though they imposed their language on the conquered people. In the Indus Valley was invented Dentistry by these people. The Iranian Dravidians (Elamites) drove the Kartvelians from Mazanderan to the Caucasus around 6000 BC. The Indus Valley people had terrible floods and plagues which drove them south. The Aryans, a mixture of Iranians and Hunas, began to filter into India around 1300 BC, absorbing some Dravidians and driving the others south. The Indo-Aryan kingdoms mentioned in the Mahabharata were established by 1100 BC. Bengal remained Dravidian much longer than western India, though they were eventually conquered. Bengal means “God’s Country” in the language of the Mundas, the original inhabitants.

    The Dravidians were related to but not the same as Elamites, since they arose as a mixture of Elamites and African settlers from the Horn of Africa in the Ormozgan area of southeastern Iran, around 7500 BC.

    The ancient Adivasis or Australoids originally spoke Australian languages before the Dravidians conquered them. The Dravidians are related to Austro-Asiatics like the Mundas through extensive admixture in India, though not by common origin. Dravidians are Nostratics with an Eritrean admixture, they have a separate origin from the Austric peoples. The Australoid Adivasis are among the oldest Indians of them all, they arrived in India in 60,000 BC. But they were preceded by the Negrito ancestors of the Andamese, who were in Uttar Pradesh as early as 85,000 BC. Before them Denisovan hominin and Homo Erectus lived in India for countless ages, and a few of their most ancient genes are still in the Indian people today.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-22 12:53:00 UTC