Form: Sketch

  • Archetypes(Myth), MBTI (Literature), BIG5 (Philosophy), Propertarianism (logic)

    October 18th, 2018 10:28 AM SCALE: ARCHETYPES(Myth), MBTI (Literature), BIG5 (Philosophy), PROPERTARIANISM (logic)

    Think of MBTI as LIterature, and BIG5 as Philosophy, and Propertarianism as Logic: Graceful increase and decrease in precision according to the ability of the individual: SATISFACTION OF THE MARKETS FOR COMPREHENSION.

  • Evolutionary Spectrum: Literary, Empirical, and Scientific Conservative Authors

    October 18th, 2018 10:22 AM EVOLUTIONARY SPECTRUM: LITERARY, EMPIRICAL, AND SCIENTIFIC CONSERVATIVE AUTHORS [P]ropertarianism (law of cooperation) is a proof system (logic of falsification) for all cognitive dimensions, and survives falsification in all cognitively possible dimensions (science). Once you have the proof system (tests of falsification), ‘experiential stories’ and ‘opinions’ can be tested. In other words, it’s one thing to have other author’s options and another to show that they are TRUE. So It’s possible to show that the LITERARY conservatives of the Continental Tradition (secular theology) Nietzsche, Evola, Kuhnelt-Leddhin, Stirner, Kirk , Spengler and the EMPIRICAL conservatives (Social Science) Locke, Hume, Smith, Hamilton, Burke, Spencer, et all, were right. But it required SCIENTIFIC conservativism (Hayek, Doolittle) to explain WHY.

  • GRACEFUL FAILURE OF PEDAGOGY AND RULE (Markets) Mathematics, Science < Law, Phil

    GRACEFUL FAILURE OF PEDAGOGY AND RULE

    (Markets) Mathematics, Science < Law, Philosophy < Literature, Myth, Fairy-tale < vs (Conflation) Religion : Graceful Failure from the most able (With Agency) to the least able (Without Agency).


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 14:05:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1052923527752499200

  • THE MARKET COMPETITION BETWEEN MEANING AND TRUTH Education: the market competiti

    THE MARKET COMPETITION BETWEEN MEANING AND TRUTH

    Education: the market competition between:

    …. POSITIVA: MEANING: Literature, Myth, Parable – The act of Generating constant relations, and The Promise of Reward.

    …. -vs-

    …. NEGATIVA: TRUTH: History, Law, Science, Mathematics – Falsify (test) constant relations: The act of Performing Due Diligence against ignorance, error, bias, and deceit and The Warranty (Promise) of Truth (non-falsehood).


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 10:53:00 UTC

  • SCALE: ARCHETYPES(Myth), MBTI (Literature), BIG5 (Philosophy), PROPERTARIANISM (

    SCALE: ARCHETYPES(Myth), MBTI (Literature), BIG5 (Philosophy), PROPERTARIANISM (logic)

    Think of MBTI as LIterature, and BIG5 as Philosophy, and Propertarianism as Logic: Graceful increase and decrease in precision according to the ability of the individual: SATISFACTION OF THE MARKETS FOR COMPREHENSION.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 10:28:00 UTC

  • EVOLUTIONARY SPECTRUM: LITERARY, EMPIRICAL, AND SCIENTIFIC CONSERVATIVE AUTHORS

    EVOLUTIONARY SPECTRUM: LITERARY, EMPIRICAL, AND SCIENTIFIC CONSERVATIVE AUTHORS

    Propertarianism (law of cooperation) is a proof system (logic of falsification) for all cognitive dimensions, and survives falsification in all cognitively possible dimensions (science).

    Once you have the proof system (tests of falsification), ‘experiential stories’ and ‘opinions’ can be tested.

    In other words, it’s one thing to have other author’s options and another to show that they are TRUE.

    So It’s possible to show that the LITERARY conservatives of the Continental Tradition (secular theology) Nietzsche, Evola, Kuhnelt-Leddhin, Stirner, Kirk , Spengler and the EMPIRICAL conservatives (Social Science) Locke, Hume, Smith, Hamilton, Burke, Spencer, et all, were right.

    But it required SCIENTIFIC conservativism (Hayek, Doolittle) to explain WHY.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 10:22:00 UTC

  • INTELLIGENCE TESTING AND NEURAL ECONOMY My understanding of the Analytic (extern

    INTELLIGENCE TESTING AND NEURAL ECONOMY

    My understanding of the Analytic (external) to Empathic (internal) Spectrum of Grammars used in intelligence testing.

    || Raven’s(Patterns) < Math(Short term memory) < Logic < Vocabulary < Argument(Judgement) < Interpretation of Prose (Reading Comprehension).

    Like anything else, these tend to be gender biased if for no other reason than we train our brains by the route with the most available information to train our brains.

    Not complicated. Networks do what they do. Inputs determine categories, values, and relations.

    Neural plasticity exists, however, neural economies also exist. And like all things, we pay for one thing in lieu of paying for another.

    Now, I don’t believe in multiple intelligences simply because intelligence scales in concert across all abilities. But with that scaling we still encounter the difference between the vertical (analytic) male brain structure of specialization and horizontal (synthetic) female brain structure of generalization.

    Distributions in everything.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-14 08:53:00 UTC

  • (F>) Herds, Compromisers, Pack Hunters, Solitary Hunters () Psych

    (F>) Herds, Compromisers, Pack Hunters, Solitary Hunters (<M), versus (F>) Psychotic, Solipsistic, Balanced, Analytic, Autistic (<M). With:

    Trait differences are minor variations in the stage of the prey drive. And:

    Biased by major variations in the differences of the sex drive.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-02 22:23:00 UTC