In the first age, with the birth of our people in the indo european expansion (5500 ybp). In the second age with the birth of our civilization in the founding of rome (2772 ybp). In the third age with the birth of our lawgiver aristotle (2403 ybp).
As Taleb was illustrating with his odd iq curve, then we can start with 140/150 and consider that a possible biological optimum and declines inefficiencies. We can do the same for polities. Norms must suit the median, yet ideas are increasingly inefficient lower on the curve.
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46493645_10156787024747264_5118172295960985600_o_10156787024737264.jpg USING SERIES TO TEST A LINE OF CONSTANT RELATIONS ACROSS SCALES
—“Always love this structure of Aphorism”— A Twitter Friend danqueseq
(referring to use of series to illustrate a concept)
One point – an ideal, or ideal type – tells you nothing. Three points to test a line. More points falsify the line such that it is increasingly free of ignorance, error, bias and deceit.
Hence, demand for definitions in series as a defense against conflation, inflation, and fictionalism.
-hugs brother.Skye StewartThe left tests the limits capital accumulation
The right tests the limits of capital outlayNov 18, 2018, 12:09 PMCurt Doolittleooh… quotable… well done.Nov 18, 2018, 12:29 PMBryan Nova BreySkye Stewart What does the Federal Reserve test?Nov 18, 2018, 12:48 PMMichael D. AbbottYes. id = infantile. ego = maternal. super egp = paternal. I know you don’t subscribe to these terms–but it’s a similar idea.Nov 18, 2018, 12:55 PMSkye StewartBryan Nova Brey patience?Nov 18, 2018, 1:05 PMKari Anne DorstadI don’t see myself as a women that tests the limit of Men ! It’s not my nature to do that !Nov 18, 2018, 2:26 PMMichael D. AbbottGood women encourage men to test each other, while remaining encouraging.Nov 18, 2018, 2:31 PMMichael D. AbbottBut the female shadow tests men to the core.Nov 18, 2018, 2:31 PMCurt Doolittle^really? Or are you imagining that? What do women really do? they continuously sh-t test, in every culture. Women undermine men constantly through nagging and endless seeking of acquisitions….
Good women are in place because bad women are prevented, but that doesn’t mean women are naturally good, any more than men are naturally good. Men and women are naturally pragmatic, and we use violence and threats to force them gradually out of bad and into surviving by the good. which is quite expensive and difficult.Nov 18, 2018, 3:26 PMUSING SERIES TO TEST A LINE OF CONSTANT RELATIONS ACROSS SCALES
—“Always love this structure of Aphorism”— A Twitter Friend danqueseq
(referring to use of series to illustrate a concept)
One point – an ideal, or ideal type – tells you nothing. Three points to test a line. More points falsify the line such that it is increasingly free of ignorance, error, bias and deceit.
Hence, demand for definitions in series as a defense against conflation, inflation, and fictionalism.
once males had tools, and particularly spears it was possible for females to rally males to constrain alphas – and females could gain some control of reproduction, – and contractualism could improve among males.
Her argument that females were abused is a moralism – meaningless. evolution doesn’t care.
groups of males possess territory and females in competition with other males who desire to take both. females can obtain ingroup status and influence more safely than outgroup.
humans developed pairing off and serial monogamy out of safety since males will kill over access to females (reproduction) more so than any other incentive.
agrarianism changed everything and gave us marriage and property. as well as customs and laws.
we are in a post agrarian period and reverting to serial monogamy in lower classes and maintaining monogamy in the upper. this has drastically increased single motherhood, lower male loyalty to offspring, decreased household size and eliminated the middle class.
women’s intuitions are cumulatively decivilizing (experiential rather than consequential) under monopoly democracy, so without creating separate houses of government for males and females, we should continue to decline into the south american model with women’s entry into the voting pool the cause.
