Curt Doolittle

Form: Sketch

  • The American Postwar Failure Financed by American Debt

    |PROCESS|Traditional Law (Constitutionalism) > Utility > Postwar Morality > Economics > Obama-chaos > Decline > Civil War. [W]e didn’t have a ‘bible’ of western civ beyond which no man may tread. That’s the beginning of the problem: tradition vs articulation of the science under our tradition. We didn’t organize against neoliberalism. We had no scientific answer to neo-liberalism (neo-marxism). We won against marxism simply by its demonstrated failure. We didn’t organize against immigration like we did against communism. That’s the problem first problem. We didn’t organize to achieve against islamic fundamentalism as we organized against communism. That’s the problem. Without immigration we would have won (a) Rule of law (b) economics, (c) social norms (d) religion and education. The only reason we lost so far is women voting, that suppressed the ability of men to defend against women’s voting patterns.

  • reciprocity, completeness (limits, full accounting, parsimony), and coherence (a

    … reciprocity, completeness (limits, full accounting, parsimony), and coherence (across all those dimensions), with warranty of due diligence sufficient to satisfy demand for decidability, and resources sufficient to perform restitution. In other words it’s testimonial.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-28 13:12:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177934106916769799

    Reply addressees: @LLaddon @TheRajput8

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1177933698144047106

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @LLaddon @TheRajput8 P uses testimony, not just internal consistency, or external correspondence (empiricism). All 8 dimensions of possible human sense perception. P is ‘complete’ where logic and empiricism are not: Tests: identity, logic, correspondence, operational possibility, rational choice …

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1177933698144047106

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @LLaddon @TheRajput8 P uses testimony, not just internal consistency, or external correspondence (empiricism). All 8 dimensions of possible human sense perception. P is ‘complete’ where logic and empiricism are not: Tests: identity, logic, correspondence, operational possibility, rational choice …

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1177933698144047106

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/69993107_466697960593766_42629825242

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/69993107_466697960593766_42629825242

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/69993107_466697960593766_4262982524222832640_n_466697957260433.jpg PATTERN EMERGING

    (to expand, see grid cells, location cells etc)

    —“…when there are four choices, a quantum search can distinguish between four alternatives in a single step. Indeed, four is optimal number.

    This thinking also explains why there are 20 amino acids. In DNA, each set of three nucleotides defines a single amino acid. So the sequence of triplets in DNA defines the sequence of amino acids in a protein.

    But during protein assembly, each amino acid must be chosen from a soup of 20 different options. Grover’s algorithm explains these numbers: a three-step quantum search can find an object in a database containing up to 20 kinds of entry. Again, 20 is the optimal number.

    In other words, if the search processes involved in assembling DNA and proteins is to be as efficient as possible, the number of bases should be four and the number of amino acids should to be 20—exactly as is found. The only caveat is that the searches must be quantum in nature.”—PATTERN EMERGING

    (to expand, see grid cells, location cells etc)

    —“…when there are four choices, a quantum search can distinguish between four alternatives in a single step. Indeed, four is optimal number.

    This thinking also explains why there are 20 amino acids. In DNA, each set of three nucleotides defines a single amino acid. So the sequence of triplets in DNA defines the sequence of amino acids in a protein.

    But during protein assembly, each amino acid must be chosen from a soup of 20 different options. Grover’s algorithm explains these numbers: a three-step quantum search can find an object in a database containing up to 20 kinds of entry. Again, 20 is the optimal number.

    In other words, if the search processes involved in assembling DNA and proteins is to be as efficient as possible, the number of bases should be four and the number of amino acids should to be 20—exactly as is found. The only caveat is that the searches must be quantum in nature.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-16 03:01:00 UTC

  • Scale of Demonstrated and Permitted Agency

    by Ferdinand Pisaro 

    Scale of Demonstrated [& Permitted] Agency*
|———————------------—>|(+)
(5).(4).(3).(2).(1).(0)
... ... ... ... ... (0) Sovereign (Aristocracy)(Peerage)
... ... ... ... (1) Vassal (Nobility)
... ... ... (2) Tradesman (Burgher) 
... ... (3) Craftsman (Freeman) 
... (4) Laborer (Serf)
(5) Dependent (Slave)

    *With an increase in agency (demonstrated by the scale that an agent can act in) an agent rises through the spectrum of classes. And as an agent gains status the scope of his action increases because he has demonstrated to his peers that he posses the agency to act at his respective scale without producing negative externalities.SELF-DEFENSE Retaliation against impositions upon that in which an agent has invested (paid a cost). As an agent rises in the spectrum of demonstrated-agency, the portfolio of his property increases, and so to the permitted defense he can field. The cost of Peerage/Sovereignty is paid by a deposit of violence and the granting of reciprocal insurance against impositions of cost upon property-en-toto. Complete-Peerage requires perfect reciprocity, including the requirement for symmetrical information. Thus dispute-resolution between peers requires warrantied, truthful testimony—that is, decidability in dispute resolution amongst peers requires the construction of judicial defense. Aristocracy limits the self-defense of non and semi-peers to the scale merited by the agent’s respective scope of action and thus property. Thusly, just an agent moves from: 

    slave > serf >freeman > burgher > vassal > sovereign

    …he is permitted to engage in self-defense from: 

    none > body > body & parcel (home)> body & productive capital > 
body & territorial capital (fiefdom) > body & polity.

    And as we decrease in scale, legal decidability is provided by the proportional immediacy of the risk/treat/cost posed to body & property. Extending beyond one’s permission to defend property in a manner proportional to scale is met with (judicial) retaliation. So those granted limited self-defense, by permission of the sovereign, must do so under the conditions deemed appropriate by the sovereign. And since retaliation-cycles decrease the value of the sovereigns holdings, the sovereign has an incentive to suppress the cost imposed on his holdings by requiring that disputes be settled by jurors (peers) & judge.

  • Scale of Demonstrated and Permitted Agency

    by Ferdinand Pisaro 

    Scale of Demonstrated [& Permitted] Agency*
|———————------------—>|(+)
(5).(4).(3).(2).(1).(0)
... ... ... ... ... (0) Sovereign (Aristocracy)(Peerage)
... ... ... ... (1) Vassal (Nobility)
... ... ... (2) Tradesman (Burgher) 
... ... (3) Craftsman (Freeman) 
... (4) Laborer (Serf)
(5) Dependent (Slave)

    *With an increase in agency (demonstrated by the scale that an agent can act in) an agent rises through the spectrum of classes. And as an agent gains status the scope of his action increases because he has demonstrated to his peers that he posses the agency to act at his respective scale without producing negative externalities.SELF-DEFENSE Retaliation against impositions upon that in which an agent has invested (paid a cost). As an agent rises in the spectrum of demonstrated-agency, the portfolio of his property increases, and so to the permitted defense he can field. The cost of Peerage/Sovereignty is paid by a deposit of violence and the granting of reciprocal insurance against impositions of cost upon property-en-toto. Complete-Peerage requires perfect reciprocity, including the requirement for symmetrical information. Thus dispute-resolution between peers requires warrantied, truthful testimony—that is, decidability in dispute resolution amongst peers requires the construction of judicial defense. Aristocracy limits the self-defense of non and semi-peers to the scale merited by the agent’s respective scope of action and thus property. Thusly, just an agent moves from: 

    slave > serf >freeman > burgher > vassal > sovereign

    …he is permitted to engage in self-defense from: 

    none > body > body & parcel (home)> body & productive capital > 
body & territorial capital (fiefdom) > body & polity.

    And as we decrease in scale, legal decidability is provided by the proportional immediacy of the risk/treat/cost posed to body & property. Extending beyond one’s permission to defend property in a manner proportional to scale is met with (judicial) retaliation. So those granted limited self-defense, by permission of the sovereign, must do so under the conditions deemed appropriate by the sovereign. And since retaliation-cycles decrease the value of the sovereigns holdings, the sovereign has an incentive to suppress the cost imposed on his holdings by requiring that disputes be settled by jurors (peers) & judge.

  • The only problem facing western man in the ancient world and in the modern, is t

    The only problem facing western man in the ancient world and in the modern, is that we lacked a book of parables (histories) and scriptures (laws) beyond which no man or woman may tread.

    That’s not true any longer. We have our “scripture” of the ancient and modern world.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-19 13:10:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163437986853396482

    Reply addressees: @SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163437614843801601

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux … and the ignorance, poverty, suffering, of those who destroy them.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1163437614843801601

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux … and the ignorance, poverty, suffering, of those who destroy them.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1163437614843801601

  • A particle is the front edge of the wave. The fact that we don’t have a model, i

    A particle is the front edge of the wave. The fact that we don’t have a model, in analogy to human experience, for the underlying constitution of the wave, how many dimensions of causality affect it, or whether space is what’s vibrating, or whether it’s a medium within space.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-29 15:18:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155860139725000704

    Reply addressees: @RadioInBlack

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155859294245597187

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @RadioInBlack There is no theory a human scale better than newtonian, none at macro scale better than relativity, and none at micro scale rather than quantum mechanics. That early authors used fashionable Postmodern prose to state the Copenhagen Interpretation, is just that.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1155859294245597187

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @RadioInBlack There is no theory a human scale better than newtonian, none at macro scale better than relativity, and none at micro scale rather than quantum mechanics. That early authors used fashionable Postmodern prose to state the Copenhagen Interpretation, is just that.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1155859294245597187

  • CONSCIOUSNESS Working (thinking about) with this disambiguation: . Dead . . Brai

    CONSCIOUSNESS
    Working (thinking about) with this disambiguation:

    . Dead
    . . Brain Dead
    . . . Comatose
    . . . . “Unconscious” (this word is problematic)
    . . . . . Asleep, Sleeping
    . . . . . . Alert, Alertness (monitoring)
    . . . . . . . Aware, Awareness (sense-disambiguation)
    . . . . . . . . Conscious, Consciousness (valuation, judgement)
    . . . . . . . . . Executing (Executive function)
    . . . . . . . . . . Planning
    . . . . . . . . . . . Calculating
    . . . . . . . . . . . . Computing

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:25:08 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508207035570103

  • HOW CONSCIOUSNESS “RESTORES” Michio Kaku describes the stages of consciousness w

    HOW CONSCIOUSNESS “RESTORES”

    Michio Kaku describes the stages of consciousness which are close enough:
    … My body in space (space)
    … … Others in my near space (environment)
    … … … Future spaces (time)

    Unfortunately I have a lot of (painful) experience with the process of gradually restoring consciousness.

    The Monitor (yeah, that’s ‘you’ – with 1/10 second of memory.)
    … The Body (position, orientation, condition) 1/2 second mem.
    … … The Space (surrounding the body) (3 seconds of mem)
    … … … Others (in the space) (10 seconds of memory
    … … … … … The Context ( minutes of memory)
    … … … … … … And Past ( remembering ‘you’)
    … … … … … … … The Future ( ‘what now?’)
    … … … … … … … … Whatever was on your mind (what plans snd strategies have a I got going on).

    And this both of our descriptions are compatible, and also reflect the brain structure and organ responsibility

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:10:54 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508151040973459

  • Christian Nationalism… Christianity(love) > Heathenism (kin, ancestors, nature

    Christian Nationalism… Christianity(love) > Heathenism (kin, ancestors, nature) > aristotelianism (truth, law, science) can be made exclusive under law, and all other religions easily. We cannot mandate supernaturalism for ‘the rest of us’.

    ( Agreed on love and respect. )

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-09 18:56:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1148667316776919040

    Reply addressees: @Read_Her_Books @OrienPermu

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1148625491517161472

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1148625491517161472