Oct 29, 2019, 1:23 PM MASCULINE/K .. Fascists (Ethno National – Secular Theologians) .. .. Pagans (Ethno-Nationalists) .. .. .. Social Conservatives (reasonable, normativists) .. .. .. .. Right Libertarians (jeffersonian constitutionalists) .. .. .. .. .. Civic Nationalist (Centrists) .. .. .. .. .. .. Democratic Egalitarians (centrists, insurance) .. .. .. .. .. .. Christian Conservatives (Universalists)***** .. .. .. .. .. Left Progressives (socialists, redistributivists) .. .. .. .. Left Liberals (ant-masculine, destructivists, postmodernists) .. .. .. Left Radicals (anti-western destructivists, antifa) .. .. Communists (economic destructivists) .. Conservative Jews, Islamists (cultural destructivists) FEMININE/R DYSGENIC Note the location of Christians. Christians have traditionally been leftists. And until the Marxist, postmodern, feminist attack on christianity in an effort to create a religion of the state, the christians were absolutely positively anti-aristocratic, ant-commercial, and only pro family, pro theology.
Form: Sketch
-
Note Where Christians Sit in This Political Triangle
Oct 29, 2019, 1:23 PM MASCULINE/K .. Fascists (Ethno National – Secular Theologians) .. .. Pagans (Ethno-Nationalists) .. .. .. Social Conservatives (reasonable, normativists) .. .. .. .. Right Libertarians (jeffersonian constitutionalists) .. .. .. .. .. Civic Nationalist (Centrists) .. .. .. .. .. .. Democratic Egalitarians (centrists, insurance) .. .. .. .. .. .. Christian Conservatives (Universalists)***** .. .. .. .. .. Left Progressives (socialists, redistributivists) .. .. .. .. Left Liberals (ant-masculine, destructivists, postmodernists) .. .. .. Left Radicals (anti-western destructivists, antifa) .. .. Communists (economic destructivists) .. Conservative Jews, Islamists (cultural destructivists) FEMININE/R DYSGENIC Note the location of Christians. Christians have traditionally been leftists. And until the Marxist, postmodern, feminist attack on christianity in an effort to create a religion of the state, the christians were absolutely positively anti-aristocratic, ant-commercial, and only pro family, pro theology.
-
(opportunities in thought) (note: before wolfram announced his solution)
Jan 5, 2020, 3:51 PM Thoughts… Subconscious has been troubled by (or working on) something that is beginning to take shape, and I can’t quite put my finger on it yet, but it’s coming out as very clear distinction between the feminine semitic and compromise hindu, and masculine european-sinic, but it’s deeper than that. It’s that the female-semitic method of argument (baiting into hazard is literally the antithesis of evolution. It’s the greatest threat to humanity – greater than plagues. Because its a plague of the mind. The discussions today on operations. It’s another example of whomever made the comment last summer, that the Grammars are as important as testimonialism and acquistionism+propertarianism. I keep seeing more and more opportunity behind the grammars and this whole need for a new mathematics and the grammars is running around my head and there is something there on the fringes of auto association – a pattern of something – that I think would dwarf the previous insights. So there is this strange constellation forming between the semitic-european falseood-truth problem, the next-math problem, and … damn. Constitution -> Course -> Big Book -> Religion – and in the background I”m going to have to work on this problem and see where wolfram hit a dead end.
-
(opportunities in thought) (note: before wolfram announced his solution)
Jan 5, 2020, 3:51 PM Thoughts… Subconscious has been troubled by (or working on) something that is beginning to take shape, and I can’t quite put my finger on it yet, but it’s coming out as very clear distinction between the feminine semitic and compromise hindu, and masculine european-sinic, but it’s deeper than that. It’s that the female-semitic method of argument (baiting into hazard is literally the antithesis of evolution. It’s the greatest threat to humanity – greater than plagues. Because its a plague of the mind. The discussions today on operations. It’s another example of whomever made the comment last summer, that the Grammars are as important as testimonialism and acquistionism+propertarianism. I keep seeing more and more opportunity behind the grammars and this whole need for a new mathematics and the grammars is running around my head and there is something there on the fringes of auto association – a pattern of something – that I think would dwarf the previous insights. So there is this strange constellation forming between the semitic-european falseood-truth problem, the next-math problem, and … damn. Constitution -> Course -> Big Book -> Religion – and in the background I”m going to have to work on this problem and see where wolfram hit a dead end.
-
(placeholder) ( … undone … )
Feb 3, 2020, 10:05 AM (discuss incentives that produce conspiracies of common interest – and managed decline/equilibrium)(real conspiracy is ‘all’ rather than each nation competing an the market driving all upward) TRILATERAL COMMISSION WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM – DAVOS BILDERBERG GROUP CONFERNECE MOUNT PELERIN SOCIETY WORLD BANK G7, WTO – World Trade Organization, IMF – International Monetary Fund, THE UNITED NATIONS “Davos Man” “Davos Man” is a neologism referring to the global elite of wealthy (predominantly) men, whose members view themselves as completely “international”. According to political scientist Samuel P. Huntington, who is credited with inventing the phrase “Davos Man”,[88] they are people who “have little need for national loyalty, view national boundaries as obstacles that thankfully are vanishing, and see national governments as residues from the past whose only useful function is to facilitate the élite’s global operations”. In his 2004 article “Dead Souls: The Denationalization of the American Elite”, Huntington argues that this international perspective is a minority elitist position not shared by the nationalist majority of the people.[89] Davos men supposedly see their identity as a matter of personal choice, not an accident of birth. John Fonte of the Hudson Institute has suggested that the transnational ideology of Davos Man represents a major challenge to Francis Fukuyama’s assertion that liberal democracy represents the fulfillment of The End of History and the Last Man. Hernando de Soto Polar said that although internationally connected, each country’s elite lives in a bell jar in the sense of being out of touch with its own populace. Their isolation fosters a tendency to be oblivious to the fate of their fellow citizens. Lawrence Summers refers to this concept as the “stateless elites”, tied more to the success of the global economy than to any nation, and views it as eroding support for continuing globalization
-
(placeholder) ( … undone … )
Feb 3, 2020, 10:05 AM (discuss incentives that produce conspiracies of common interest – and managed decline/equilibrium)(real conspiracy is ‘all’ rather than each nation competing an the market driving all upward) TRILATERAL COMMISSION WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM – DAVOS BILDERBERG GROUP CONFERNECE MOUNT PELERIN SOCIETY WORLD BANK G7, WTO – World Trade Organization, IMF – International Monetary Fund, THE UNITED NATIONS “Davos Man” “Davos Man” is a neologism referring to the global elite of wealthy (predominantly) men, whose members view themselves as completely “international”. According to political scientist Samuel P. Huntington, who is credited with inventing the phrase “Davos Man”,[88] they are people who “have little need for national loyalty, view national boundaries as obstacles that thankfully are vanishing, and see national governments as residues from the past whose only useful function is to facilitate the élite’s global operations”. In his 2004 article “Dead Souls: The Denationalization of the American Elite”, Huntington argues that this international perspective is a minority elitist position not shared by the nationalist majority of the people.[89] Davos men supposedly see their identity as a matter of personal choice, not an accident of birth. John Fonte of the Hudson Institute has suggested that the transnational ideology of Davos Man represents a major challenge to Francis Fukuyama’s assertion that liberal democracy represents the fulfillment of The End of History and the Last Man. Hernando de Soto Polar said that although internationally connected, each country’s elite lives in a bell jar in the sense of being out of touch with its own populace. Their isolation fosters a tendency to be oblivious to the fate of their fellow citizens. Lawrence Summers refers to this concept as the “stateless elites”, tied more to the success of the global economy than to any nation, and views it as eroding support for continuing globalization
-
Functionalism
Feb 10, 2020, 9:46 AM Monarchy (kinship priesthood) … Aristocracy( military priesthood) … … Judiciary (legal priesthood) … … … Nobility (Familial Priesthood) … … … … Priesthood (Emotional Priesthood) … … … … … The People (production of generations, goods, services, and information)
-
Functionalism
Feb 10, 2020, 9:46 AM Monarchy (kinship priesthood) … Aristocracy( military priesthood) … … Judiciary (legal priesthood) … … … Nobility (Familial Priesthood) … … … … Priesthood (Emotional Priesthood) … … … … … The People (production of generations, goods, services, and information)
-
Categories of Religion
by Luke Weinhagen Maybe play off parasitism with other forms of symbiosis – 1. Mutualitic Religion – benefit to practitioners and benefit to non-practitioners … (Rule of Law)
Commensalitic Religion – benefit to practitioners with no cost to non-practitioner
… (christianity, buddhism, animism)Amensalitic Religion – no benefit to the practitioner and harm to the non-practitioner
….(islam)Parasitic Religion – benefit to the practitioner and harm to the non-practitioner
…. (judaism)
-
Categories of Religion
by Luke Weinhagen Maybe play off parasitism with other forms of symbiosis – 1. Mutualitic Religion – benefit to practitioners and benefit to non-practitioners … (Rule of Law)
Commensalitic Religion – benefit to practitioners with no cost to non-practitioner
… (christianity, buddhism, animism)Amensalitic Religion – no benefit to the practitioner and harm to the non-practitioner
….(islam)Parasitic Religion – benefit to the practitioner and harm to the non-practitioner
…. (judaism)