Curt Doolittle

Form: Short Note

  • RELATIONSHIPS: IS HE OR SHE “INTO” YOU? (love) Let me help you. If she’s ‘doing

    RELATIONSHIPS: IS HE OR SHE “INTO” YOU?

    (love)

    Let me help you. If she’s ‘doing you’ then she’s into you. If she’s not ‘doing you’ then she’s not.

    Likewise, if he’s trying to constantly spend time with you, he’s into you. If he isn’t trying constantly to spend time with you, he’s not into you.

    Men and women hold out hope. She holds out hope he will give her more attention. He holds out hope that she will give him more sex. But the fact that you hold out hope is an admission of failure.

    When we are attracted to each other we cannot bear to be apart. If you can bear to be apart. If you can bear be sleep alone. They you’re not into each other. It’s that simple.

    Yes, I am referring to post 1960 relationships. Where our relations are not matters of survival, or matters of economic cooperation, but matters of love and friendship.

    There is a difference between Useful, Interesting, fun, passion, and Love. Love is wanting the other person to be happy in order for you to be happy. It’s the inability to live without the other person.

    Anything else is merely less. Maybe less than love is enough for some. But it’s not enough for those who produce and desire it.

    You must not hope. You must not wait. You must understand: if he or she isn’t attracted to you then move on. Attraction is required for the development of long term love.

    Habit is not a reason for a relationship. It certainly isn’t the recipe for an enduring one.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-01 03:37:00 UTC

  • DOD Guys En Force: Ohio, Tennessee, Florida, Kansas. Uh huh. Don’t wanna give ou

    DOD Guys En Force:

    Ohio, Tennessee, Florida, Kansas. Uh huh.

    Don’t wanna give out information at all. lol.

    White boys. Soldiers. Warriors.

    You see, I love these men. I don’t disdain them. I don’t hold them in any kind of contempt.

    Like every liberal does.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-01 01:13:00 UTC

  • Spencer and Darwin were so close. Unfortunately mises, popper, hayek, brouwer, b

    Spencer and Darwin were so close. Unfortunately mises, popper, hayek, brouwer, bridgman, and poincare failed to carry them across the threshold.

    Why? Because the combination of women, marx, boaz, freud, created a sentimental alternative to truth – a great lie. And after the great war, keynes created a way to use consumption to recover from it, and the promise of something new to mask the regret of the catastrophe. In other words, we replaced art, heroism, and truth, with crass consumption and, proletarianism to hold the state together, an innumerate pseudoscience to systematize it, and postmodern lies to defend it all.

    I understand that we must produce a synthesis of truth and religion. This is the hardest objective to solve. Principally because men need costly rituals in order to defend the principles that they attest to.

    I understand how the previous century failed. I understand why the great lies succeeded in the post war era, for the same reason that christianity succeeded in the post-war and post-plaque era.

    I think I understand how to create that religion, philosophy, logic, and science.

    Please god give me strength, energy, time, and resources to do it.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-01 00:46:00 UTC

  • KNOW THYSELF Most of us must in the end rely upon introspective query of our acc

    KNOW THYSELF

    Most of us must in the end rely upon introspective query of our accumulated experience – all of which is framed by genetic influence. We confuse quite often the required skepticism of the scientist and the luxury of his indecision with the cautious pessimism of the warrior without the luxury of indecision and call it wisdom rather than mere luxury. This behavior is the philosophical bias of the unaccountable, not of truth. Others choose action given their sense of accountability. But whether choosing accountability or unaccountability is in itself a choice between action and inaction. Between decision and indecision. Between cost and cost evasion. All costs are opportunity costs. Time matters.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-01 00:30:00 UTC

  • Ruining the Ukrainians with comfort food that is bad for you: 1) Breakfast: Carb

    Ruining the Ukrainians with comfort food that is bad for you:

    1) Breakfast: Carbonara

    2) Lunch: Primavera

    3) Dinner: Bolognese

    4) Bedtime Sweets: Cannoli

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-31 14:00:00 UTC

  • never believe me when I tell them about this

    http://bit.ly/1nTJNwJUkrainians never believe me when I tell them about this.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-30 15:04:00 UTC

  • ( The suffrage movement was originally developed in response to the wealth of th

    ( The suffrage movement was originally developed in response to the wealth of the industrial revolution. The Feminist movement was developed in an effort to replace Patriarchy with Matriarchy. But there is a reason no societies are Matriarchal: they are easily conquered if men do not defend the female herd from other male packs. In other words, one of the central problems with the formation of any ‘society’ is providing men with the incentive to defend a commons.)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-29 14:24:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-28 03:19:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://www.onefunmom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/4-Mistaken-Purposes-Download.pdf

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-28 00:02:00 UTC

  • So, Johannes Meixner. Apparently I need to come visit you in Tallinn? Is that wh

    So, Johannes Meixner. Apparently I need to come visit you in Tallinn? Is that what you’re telling me? Gotta see the whole gang up there it seems.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-27 16:33:00 UTC