Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-22 06:45:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-22 06:45:00 UTC
So then philosophy is complete and that which we call spirituality, mysticism , myth and literature is in the domain of aesthetics: experience.
That is one of the problems I wanted to solve.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-22 06:45:00 UTC
Welcome to the new government same as the old government. They have improved the police but can’t fix the courts.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-21 15:33:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711938830190952450
Reply addressees: @RMoralIst
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711933189879508992
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711933189879508992
so to speak
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-21 10:34:00 UTC
I usually say that women just constantly try to move the ball forward a millimeter at a time. Men try to make long passes. That tends to be the best metaphor I can come up with that explains our different approaches.
Women don’t need to think to run a play. They just push at every opportunity a little bit at a time.
Women behave a little better when men are in the room. I find that men behave a little better when women are in the room. I find there are times when men and women need one another out of the room.
We don’t discuss Engineering, War, Violence, Law, or Punishment with women in the room. They don’t need to know about or understand, that stuff.
And there is a hella lot of stuff women find fascinating to talk about that I don’t want to be in the room for (baby feces). And there is a while bunch of stuff that women NEED to talk about among themselves for which men CANNOT be in the room (women stuff).
division of labor.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-21 09:52:00 UTC
I know that there are cloud services other than amazon.
the only question I have is why anyone would use them?
I love you Amazon. 🙂
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-21 09:08:00 UTC
The blockchain will survive, but bitcoin will not. It is too flawed, too slow, and without an insurer of last resort. Dead.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-20 12:46:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711534270192422913
Reply addressees: @bierlingm
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711532797941444608
IN REPLY TO:
@bierlingm
@curtdoolittle why not? I agree it’s not the panacea some take it to be.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711532797941444608
…bitcoin is and can only be a fractional share of stock in a network that has only momentum value.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-20 12:44:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711533998447726592
Reply addressees: @bierlingm
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711532797941444608
IN REPLY TO:
@bierlingm
@curtdoolittle why not? I agree it’s not the panacea some take it to be.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711532797941444608
false positioning. While the invention of a blockchain produces a method of a public ledger for the record of titles….
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-20 12:44:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711533891232931840
Reply addressees: @bierlingm
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711532797941444608
IN REPLY TO:
@bierlingm
@curtdoolittle why not? I agree it’s not the panacea some take it to be.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711532797941444608
And no, destroying the financialization of the west does not involve ‘bitcoin’. omg.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-20 12:21:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711528190313930752