( reminder. I don’t do racism. I do truth and activism. What are you gonna do? I don’t care what others do that defeats you. What are you going to do so that you aren’t defeated? )
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-17 06:41:00 UTC
( reminder. I don’t do racism. I do truth and activism. What are you gonna do? I don’t care what others do that defeats you. What are you going to do so that you aren’t defeated? )
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-17 06:41:00 UTC
The difference is that you won’t spend an entire year on one topic and cover the entire corpus searching for a method of decidability rather than meaning or utility. That’s the difference. We evolved to search for meaning so that we can discover opportunities. I don’t. I search for decidability in matters of conflict. So most people look for more haystacks to search, and I look for the single needle in each one.
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-17 06:25:00 UTC
I ask for fresh orange juice. But this is ukraine. You have to watch people. They must have given me something with preservatives. Because I am having a nice mental little joy ride today. It’s a lot like being stoned -involuntarily. Sigh.
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-16 10:45:00 UTC
WHY RIGHT V LIBERTARIAN?
Tilting right limits your market but preserves your capital.
Tilting left / libertarian increases your market but loses your capital
CAPITAL:
Genetic
Normative
Institutional
Informational
Territorial
Monumental
Infrastructural
Built
Private-Personal
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-16 02:58:00 UTC
We cannot necessarily make ourselves smarter, so much as we can remove error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, framing, framing, overloading, propaganda, pseudorationalism, pseudoscience, and deceit from the informational commons; and to train (teach) generations both the tools of calculation (reasoning), tools of manipulation and examination (crafts), and the tools of cleansing (testimony), and defending the informational commons just as we defend the cooperative commons (institutions) and the material commons (physical capital).
Let me repeat that so that it doesn’t get lost: we tell stories of great achievement because it is the only possible way of conveying heroism: desirable action at the extremes. We teach the valuable exceptions that produce the valuable rewards for high risk. We do not tell people stories of regularities that are in evidence around us every day. This is why history consists of irregularities (innovations), and why existence consists of regularities (productions). Men innovate(disrupt) through extremes and women operate (produce generations) through regularities. And we have evolved such that our gender’s abilities serve the needs.
Let me repeat that so that it doesn’t get lost: we tell stories of great achievement because it is the only possible way of conveying heroism: desirable action at the extremes. We teach the valuable exceptions that produce the valuable rewards for high risk. We do not tell people stories of regularities that are in evidence around us every day. This is why history consists of irregularities (innovations), and why existence consists of regularities (productions). Men innovate(disrupt) through extremes and women operate (produce generations) through regularities. And we have evolved such that our gender’s abilities serve the needs.
I may not like the fact that being male makes me expendable. But I must live with the reality of the division of reproductive labor. On the other hand, I am perfectly happy, if not thrilled, to set the terms by which my expendability may be exercised.
I may not like the fact that being male makes me expendable. But I must live with the reality of the division of reproductive labor. On the other hand, I am perfectly happy, if not thrilled, to set the terms by which my expendability may be exercised.
Dear Quora. Please don’t invite me to answer posts where the truth is something you don’t want.
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-15 09:15:00 UTC