Aug 24, 2016 12:11pm BOURGEOISE? NO – LOGISTICS OF WAR I get accused of bourgeoise values all the time, and I always think it’s childish, or ignorant. Generals conduct strategy and that means logistics. The last mile, for today, may depend on the character of men. But all the miles behind them, and all the yesterdays and tomorrows depend upon the logistics: production and supply lines. A dangerous, happy, well-fed soldiery capable of defeating an enemy is equipped and supported by a happy, produdtive, well fed, population competitively defeating in economics and intellectual means their competitors, just as the soldiers their competitors. I tend to think of ‘last-mile-ers’ as children: well-intentioned, passionate, but ignorant and naive. My own values are classical, intellectual, and perhaps a bit effete. I do not seek to win the great wars by my values. Nor by the elation of the throng. But by cool headed plans and execution of them, with discipline over many years.
Form: Short Note
-
Restoring Civic Organizations
RESTORING THE CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS PRIOR TO THE ATTEMPT TO INDUSTRIALIZE A MONOPOLY OF THE NUCLEAR FAMILY. We need to force the creation of (a) monasteries (education and caretaking) in the ‘scientific’ sense, and (b) regiments (emergency and defense), and (c) civic dormitories (commons construction and maintenance). These places need to provide room and board to men of character in each class, in exchange for civic labor. Strict behavioral requirements, preserving the sacredness of the commons, (and suppressing impulse), Privately managed non-profits (leaving membership discretionary and without state interference). They will absorb the excess male population that will only serve to increase, increase the scarcity of marriageable males, reduce the size and cost of the state, reduce the cost of commons construction and maintenance, improve the general health and welfare, allow us to return to handcrafted hand-maintained commons.And restore civic ‘ownership’. If in addition, we eliminate child support and alimony, the family will be restored in one or two generations. And where it isn’t we don’t need it to be.
I have learned a great deal living on this side of the pond. The old ways assisted families in classes in compatibility, they were not industrialized societies trying to mass produce middle class from variously incompatible raw materials. -
Restoring Civic Organizations
RESTORING THE CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS PRIOR TO THE ATTEMPT TO INDUSTRIALIZE A MONOPOLY OF THE NUCLEAR FAMILY. We need to force the creation of (a) monasteries (education and caretaking) in the ‘scientific’ sense, and (b) regiments (emergency and defense), and (c) civic dormitories (commons construction and maintenance). These places need to provide room and board to men of character in each class, in exchange for civic labor. Strict behavioral requirements, preserving the sacredness of the commons, (and suppressing impulse), Privately managed non-profits (leaving membership discretionary and without state interference). They will absorb the excess male population that will only serve to increase, increase the scarcity of marriageable males, reduce the size and cost of the state, reduce the cost of commons construction and maintenance, improve the general health and welfare, allow us to return to handcrafted hand-maintained commons.And restore civic ‘ownership’. If in addition, we eliminate child support and alimony, the family will be restored in one or two generations. And where it isn’t we don’t need it to be.
I have learned a great deal living on this side of the pond. The old ways assisted families in classes in compatibility, they were not industrialized societies trying to mass produce middle class from variously incompatible raw materials. -
We Didn’t Domesticate the R’s (Enough). But We Can.
WE DIDN’T DOMESTICATE THE R-SELECTORS. BUT WE CAN. Well, I’m not anti-genetics, I’m anti-falsehood, anti-deception, and anti-dysgenia. But when I tell people that “all Jews are female” J mean to suggest that just as we western men are the intellectual advocates of scientific k-selection, jews are the intellectual advocates of the pseudoscientific r-selection. And that is the role Jews play in intellectual history – before we domesticate them as we had begun to prior to the second world war and the invasion of eastern European and Russian jews. Our lesson is that we insufficiently domesticated both our women and our jews, by extending the license for free speech we gave to other warriors (enfranchised males) to women and jews, without maintaining the THREAT that we maintained with enfranchised: violence.
Had we put jews and women to the duel, maintained the punishment for deception in the commons, maintained libel, maintained slander, and never adopted tolerance for their ridiculousness, we would not have lost our civilization. I’d prefer to live in a world with women and jews. I’d just prefer that we don’t let them destroy the civilization that makes possible the liberty of women and jews to think, speak, and act ridiculous and against our interests. (That’s probably quotable) -
We Didn’t Domesticate the R’s (Enough). But We Can.
WE DIDN’T DOMESTICATE THE R-SELECTORS. BUT WE CAN. Well, I’m not anti-genetics, I’m anti-falsehood, anti-deception, and anti-dysgenia. But when I tell people that “all Jews are female” J mean to suggest that just as we western men are the intellectual advocates of scientific k-selection, jews are the intellectual advocates of the pseudoscientific r-selection. And that is the role Jews play in intellectual history – before we domesticate them as we had begun to prior to the second world war and the invasion of eastern European and Russian jews. Our lesson is that we insufficiently domesticated both our women and our jews, by extending the license for free speech we gave to other warriors (enfranchised males) to women and jews, without maintaining the THREAT that we maintained with enfranchised: violence.
Had we put jews and women to the duel, maintained the punishment for deception in the commons, maintained libel, maintained slander, and never adopted tolerance for their ridiculousness, we would not have lost our civilization. I’d prefer to live in a world with women and jews. I’d just prefer that we don’t let them destroy the civilization that makes possible the liberty of women and jews to think, speak, and act ridiculous and against our interests. (That’s probably quotable) -
Why We Failed
WHY WE FAILED. All men are comprehensible. All men are rational within their limits.
And as rational we choose what is in our interests whether moral or immoral. And we create institutions that increase the cost of the immoral. So that it is rational to choose the moral. The problem of the twentieth century is that we eliminated the normative prohibition on libel, slander, ridicule, shaming, rallying, lying, pseudoscience, and propaganda. And caused the industrialization of profiting from error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, pseudoscience, propaganda, rallying, shaming, and deceit. The reason for our failure is visible in retrospect as an inability to switch from traditional and moral justification in societies with relationships at human scale, to warranty of due diligence by thorough criticism of statements pertaining to cause and consequence when relationships exceeded human scale under the industrial revolution. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute. Kiev, Ukraine. -
Why We Failed
WHY WE FAILED. All men are comprehensible. All men are rational within their limits.
And as rational we choose what is in our interests whether moral or immoral. And we create institutions that increase the cost of the immoral. So that it is rational to choose the moral. The problem of the twentieth century is that we eliminated the normative prohibition on libel, slander, ridicule, shaming, rallying, lying, pseudoscience, and propaganda. And caused the industrialization of profiting from error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, pseudoscience, propaganda, rallying, shaming, and deceit. The reason for our failure is visible in retrospect as an inability to switch from traditional and moral justification in societies with relationships at human scale, to warranty of due diligence by thorough criticism of statements pertaining to cause and consequence when relationships exceeded human scale under the industrial revolution. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute. Kiev, Ukraine. -
Domestication Is The Consequence of Truth
When I started working on truth, I wrote that I thought maybe it was unnecessary, but that I couldn’ defeat the ‘great lies’ without solving it. So I spent a year on Truth, and it was the second important insight I’d developed. And probably the most important one. I’ve spent more than the past year on religion, and I feel like I could spend another year on it. But my original intuitions were largely correct. What I have come to understand more clearly is that the wish to eradicate the white man is the first great disruption in history.
We are to the human race, what homo sapiens was to neanderthal. The difference is that we DOMESTICATE human beings. We don’t simply wait for nature to help us evolve. The world has always been anti-white. -
Domestication Is The Consequence of Truth
When I started working on truth, I wrote that I thought maybe it was unnecessary, but that I couldn’ defeat the ‘great lies’ without solving it. So I spent a year on Truth, and it was the second important insight I’d developed. And probably the most important one. I’ve spent more than the past year on religion, and I feel like I could spend another year on it. But my original intuitions were largely correct. What I have come to understand more clearly is that the wish to eradicate the white man is the first great disruption in history.
We are to the human race, what homo sapiens was to neanderthal. The difference is that we DOMESTICATE human beings. We don’t simply wait for nature to help us evolve. The world has always been anti-white. -
chief difference between civilizations at this point is merely trust – who talks
https://propertarianism.wordpress.com/2016/09/17/moral-language-as-attempted-fraud/—“The chief difference between civilizations at this point is merely trust – who talks religiously, who talks morally, who talks legislatively, and who talks scientifically. The more truth that one relies upon the less friction exists in a society and the more productivity it releases without resistance from parasitism.”—
Source date (UTC): 2016-09-17 08:31:00 UTC