Very clearly a difference between economists and all other social scientists. Just like there is a difference between philosophers of science and all other philosophers.
Today I was so keenly aware that I about social science as an economist, philosopher of science, and theorist in algorithmic natural law….
Form: Short Note
-
Ricardo Duchesne is the real deal. 100% Solid
Ricardo Duchesne is the real deal. 100% Solid.
Source date (UTC): 2017-09-26 15:25:00 UTC
-
Mind Blowing Version Two
It’s really that simple. And yes, we can produce a periodic table of speech. I swear I could spend a whole year just documenting what this whole thing means, and adding variations to it. -
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/21768570_10155750234557264_37181375
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/21768570_10155750234557264_3718137554012735853_o_10155750234557264.jpg MIND BLOWING VERSION TWO
It’s really that simple. And yes, we can produce a periodic table of speech.
I swear I could spend a whole year just documenting what this whole thing means, and adding variations to it.Mea CulbaI can’t read it!Sep 25, 2017 3:32pmCurt DoolittleNonsense. Do I need to educate you on basics? click to open the theater view. download the image. Open it your browser and zoom it. The image is fine.Sep 25, 2017 4:11pmMea CulbaIt’s just my cellphone then! SorrySep 25, 2017 4:16pmGünther Shroomacherwould be great to have higher resolutionSep 26, 2017 9:47amMIND BLOWING VERSION TWO
It’s really that simple. And yes, we can produce a periodic table of speech.
I swear I could spend a whole year just documenting what this whole thing means, and adding variations to it.
Source date (UTC): 2017-09-25 14:36:00 UTC
-
Mind Blowing Version Two
It’s really that simple. And yes, we can produce a periodic table of speech. I swear I could spend a whole year just documenting what this whole thing means, and adding variations to it. -
I see way too many murder by cop that’s the result of (a) one officer instead of
I see way too many murder by cop that’s the result of (a) one officer instead of three, (b) failure to de-escalate, (c) overemphasis on the use of weapons instead of desescalation. The end result is too much equipment, the wrong kind of training, and too many benefits, and not enough personnel per car. This is the result of attempting to be economically efficient because of the high cost of labor. Which is nuts. Since it’s not exactly like there is a shortage of people willing to join the force, particularly if their job is to carry nothing other than pepper spray, tasers, handcuffs, in support of a single armed officer per car. There is absolutely no reason for the urgency used to bring people into submission. None. Thats all a consequence of failing to use numbers and de escalation, instead of concentrating violence in a single individual. -
I see way too many murder by cop that’s the result of (a) one officer instead of
I see way too many murder by cop that’s the result of (a) one officer instead of three, (b) failure to de-escalate, (c) overemphasis on the use of weapons instead of desescalation.
The end result is too much equipment, the wrong kind of training, and too many benefits, and not enough personnel per car.
This is the result of attempting to be economically efficient because of the high cost of labor. Which is nuts. Since it’s not exactly like there is a shortage of people willing to join the force, particularly if their job is to carry nothing other than pepper spray, tasers, handcuffs, in support of a single armed officer per car.
There is absolutely no reason for the urgency used to bring people into submission. None.
Thats all a consequence of failing to use numbers and de escalation, instead of concentrating violence in a single individual.
Source date (UTC): 2017-09-23 12:47:00 UTC
-
I see way too many murder by cop that’s the result of (a) one officer instead of
I see way too many murder by cop that’s the result of (a) one officer instead of three, (b) failure to de-escalate, (c) overemphasis on the use of weapons instead of desescalation. The end result is too much equipment, the wrong kind of training, and too many benefits, and not enough personnel per car. This is the result of attempting to be economically efficient because of the high cost of labor. Which is nuts. Since it’s not exactly like there is a shortage of people willing to join the force, particularly if their job is to carry nothing other than pepper spray, tasers, handcuffs, in support of a single armed officer per car. There is absolutely no reason for the urgency used to bring people into submission. None. Thats all a consequence of failing to use numbers and de escalation, instead of concentrating violence in a single individual. -
So it’s correct to call apriorism an ideal grammar, but not a formal grammar. Th
So it’s correct to call apriorism an ideal grammar, but not a formal grammar. Thankfully I finally know how to talk about the grammars of each incremental dimension… sigh. Mathematical grammars are not contingent because of constant relations. That’s their beauty. The problem is they’re non causal. Linguistic (Philosophical) grammars are contingent. That’s their weakness. Operational grammars are not contingent. And they’re causal. That’s their beauty. -
So it’s correct to call apriorism an ideal grammar, but not a formal grammar. Th
So it’s correct to call apriorism an ideal grammar, but not a formal grammar.
Thankfully I finally know how to talk about the grammars of each incremental dimension… sigh.
Mathematical grammars are not contingent because of constant relations. That’s their beauty. The problem is they’re non causal.
Linguistic (Philosophical) grammars are contingent. That’s their weakness.
Operational grammars are not contingent. And they’re causal. That’s their beauty.
Source date (UTC): 2017-09-23 10:03:00 UTC