Curt Doolittle

Form: Short Note

  • (Keep my own advice: women play men’s games to assert dominance or peerage but w

    (Keep my own advice: women play men’s games to assert dominance or peerage but when you respond with man game they do not like it or understand it. Always find it interesting. Women are amazing workhorses but they are psychologically fragile things. Men are not such amazing workhorses. We are sprinters so to speak. But psychologically we are nowhere near as fragile. Hence why you see crazy women and antisocial men. Me. I get in trouble because I take teasing too far. Why? Lack of sufficient empathy, and love of competition.)

  • Eventually we ran out of local flora and fauna. Eventually we ran out of new reg

    Eventually we ran out of local flora and fauna. Eventually we ran out of new regions of flora and fauna. Eventually we ran out of arable land. Eventually (soon) we will run out of resources. Eventually (later) we will run out of a capacity to transform energy. We are never free of the universe’s limits. We are never free of the limits of energy transformation in this universe. We have only one medium term problem in mankind. The malthusian population of the underclass. We have only one medium-long term in mankind: The malthusian population of the middle and upper classes. We have only one long term problem in mankind: eventually we will hit the malthusian limit of energy transformation.

  • Eventually we ran out of local flora and fauna. Eventually we ran out of new reg

    Eventually we ran out of local flora and fauna. Eventually we ran out of new regions of flora and fauna. Eventually we ran out of arable land. Eventually (soon) we will run out of resources. Eventually (later) we will run out of a capacity to transform energy.

    We are never free of the universe’s limits. We are never free of the limits of energy transformation in this universe.

    We have only one medium term problem in mankind. The malthusian population of the underclass.

    We have only one medium-long term in mankind: The malthusian population of the middle and upper classes.

    We have only one long term problem in mankind: eventually we will hit the malthusian limit of energy transformation.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-09-28 11:19:00 UTC

  • Eventually we ran out of local flora and fauna. Eventually we ran out of new reg

    Eventually we ran out of local flora and fauna. Eventually we ran out of new regions of flora and fauna. Eventually we ran out of arable land. Eventually (soon) we will run out of resources. Eventually (later) we will run out of a capacity to transform energy. We are never free of the universe’s limits. We are never free of the limits of energy transformation in this universe. We have only one medium term problem in mankind. The malthusian population of the underclass. We have only one medium-long term in mankind: The malthusian population of the middle and upper classes. We have only one long term problem in mankind: eventually we will hit the malthusian limit of energy transformation.

  • Four years of art criticism. The primary rule of which was ‘no empty words’. One

    Four years of art criticism. The primary rule of which was ‘no empty words’. One had to make thoughtful compliments and thoughtful criticisms. It sticks with you. DIMENSIONS: 1) Craft Scale (Craftsmanship(presence of resources)) 2) Design Scale (Aesthetics (presence of resources)) 3) Content (“Meaning” (presence of resources)) Scale (Population) 4) Monument Scale (Capital (Presence of resources)) Using triangulation you can rate any of ‘art, craft, or design’, by these measures. Value remains subjective but capital remains objective. Sorry, just how it is. But what I like to shock people with, is that beauty = fertility: the presence of resources. We judge art like we judge fertility in each other. It really is that simple.

  • Four years of art criticism. The primary rule of which was ‘no empty words’. One

    Four years of art criticism. The primary rule of which was ‘no empty words’. One had to make thoughtful compliments and thoughtful criticisms.

    It sticks with you.

    DIMENSIONS:

    1) Craft Scale (Craftsmanship(presence of resources))

    2) Design Scale (Aesthetics (presence of resources))

    3) Content (“Meaning” (presence of resources)) Scale (Population)

    4) Monument Scale (Capital (Presence of resources))

    Using triangulation you can rate any of ‘art, craft, or design’, by these measures. Value remains subjective but capital remains objective. Sorry, just how it is.

    But what I like to shock people with, is that beauty = fertility: the presence of resources. We judge art like we judge fertility in each other.

    It really is that simple.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-09-27 16:50:00 UTC

  • Four years of art criticism. The primary rule of which was ‘no empty words’. One

    Four years of art criticism. The primary rule of which was ‘no empty words’. One had to make thoughtful compliments and thoughtful criticisms. It sticks with you. DIMENSIONS: 1) Craft Scale (Craftsmanship(presence of resources)) 2) Design Scale (Aesthetics (presence of resources)) 3) Content (“Meaning” (presence of resources)) Scale (Population) 4) Monument Scale (Capital (Presence of resources)) Using triangulation you can rate any of ‘art, craft, or design’, by these measures. Value remains subjective but capital remains objective. Sorry, just how it is. But what I like to shock people with, is that beauty = fertility: the presence of resources. We judge art like we judge fertility in each other. It really is that simple.

  • Great Day Yesterday. Awesome

    Great Day Yesterday. Awesome.

  • Very clearly a difference between economists and all other social scientists. Ju

    Very clearly a difference between economists and all other social scientists. Just like there is a difference between philosophers of science and all other philosophers.

    Today I was so keenly aware that I about social science as an economist, philosopher of science, and theorist in algorithmic natural law….

    Source date (UTC): 2017-09-26 15:28:00 UTC

  • Very clearly a difference between economists and all other social scientists. Ju

    Very clearly a difference between economists and all other social scientists. Just like there is a difference between philosophers of science and all other philosophers. Today I was so keenly aware that I about social science as an economist, philosopher of science, and theorist in algorithmic natural law….