Curt Doolittle

Form: Short Note

  • The pan suppression of masculinity, coupled with dietary/environmental induced h

    —The pan suppression of masculinity, coupled with dietary/environmental induced hormone imbalance has contributed to undermine the natural check and balance the males provided for the females of the species. Without that check and balance, women have become cancerous to the body of society they rely on to survive.”— Anne Summers

  • The pan suppression of masculinity, coupled with dietary/environmental induced h

    —The pan suppression of masculinity, coupled with dietary/environmental induced hormone imbalance has contributed to undermine the natural check and balance the males provided for the females of the species. Without that check and balance, women have become cancerous to the body of society they rely on to survive.”— Anne Summers

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-30 16:17:00 UTC

  • I depend on women all the time in personal, private, and political life, and tha

    I depend on women all the time in personal, private, and political life, and that I find that women (and gays) provide valuable insight. I see no harm in this model, since, (as simon stated above) it would be impossible for women to use ‘female’ (deceptive) speech in public, and that this would cause a change in our women that is both desirable and necessary. So I see it as a means of completing the domestication of women – long since accomplished in men. The fact that I want to limit their excesses does not mean that I do not want their inputs. No CEO of merit ever does that. No king of merit ever does that. Leadership involves exhaustively collecting ideas until no novelties can be found. So where you see empowerment, I see constraint. Where you see risk, I see training. That is why. Produce a market for the signals and speech that is true, and provide punishment for the alternatives, and let the market do its thing. A married woman with three children, who can be legally punished for gossip and “scolding”, will be a fairly rare thing. if you don’t think that’s optimum. Thats fine. However, If I want to create a universal political consitution for every human group I have to include the options. What people do with them is their own choice.

  • I depend on women all the time in personal, private, and political life, and tha

    I depend on women all the time in personal, private, and political life, and that I find that women (and gays) provide valuable insight. I see no harm in this model, since, (as simon stated above) it would be impossible for women to use ‘female’ (deceptive) speech in public, and that this would cause a change in our women that is both desirable and necessary. So I see it as a means of completing the domestication of women – long since accomplished in men. The fact that I want to limit their excesses does not mean that I do not want their inputs. No CEO of merit ever does that. No king of merit ever does that. Leadership involves exhaustively collecting ideas until no novelties can be found. So where you see empowerment, I see constraint. Where you see risk, I see training. That is why. Produce a market for the signals and speech that is true, and provide punishment for the alternatives, and let the market do its thing. A married woman with three children, who can be legally punished for gossip and “scolding”, will be a fairly rare thing. if you don’t think that’s optimum. Thats fine. However, If I want to create a universal political consitution for every human group I have to include the options. What people do with them is their own choice.

  • I depend on women all the time in personal, private, and political life, and tha

    I depend on women all the time in personal, private, and political life, and that I find that women (and gays) provide valuable insight.

    I see no harm in this model, since, (as simon stated above) it would be impossible for women to use ‘female’ (deceptive) speech in public, and that this would cause a change in our women that is both desirable and necessary. So I see it as a means of completing the domestication of women – long since accomplished in men.

    The fact that I want to limit their excesses does not mean that I do not want their inputs. No CEO of merit ever does that. No king of merit ever does that. Leadership involves exhaustively collecting ideas until no novelties can be found.

    So where you see empowerment, I see constraint. Where you see risk, I see training. That is why. Produce a market for the signals and speech that is true, and provide punishment for the alternatives, and let the market do its thing.

    A married woman with three children, who can be legally punished for gossip and “scolding”, will be a fairly rare thing.

    if you don’t think that’s optimum. Thats fine. However, If I want to create a universal political consitution for every human group I have to include the options.

    What people do with them is their own choice.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-30 16:00:00 UTC

  • 1) the nyt was in the process of producing an expose. they interviewed a “substa

    1) the nyt was in the process of producing an expose. they interviewed a “substantial” number of women. 2) nbc management found out from staff. 3) they had prior knowledge for years. 4) tolerance of it pierces board and officer protections ( i have had this problem with a male exec who was harmless, even cute, and none of the women wanted to prosecute, but counsel is adamant) 5) they had no choice but to act and act before outed by the nyt.

  • 1) the nyt was in the process of producing an expose. they interviewed a “substa

    1) the nyt was in the process of producing an expose. they interviewed a “substantial” number of women. 2) nbc management found out from staff. 3) they had prior knowledge for years. 4) tolerance of it pierces board and officer protections ( i have had this problem with a male exec who was harmless, even cute, and none of the women wanted to prosecute, but counsel is adamant) 5) they had no choice but to act and act before outed by the nyt.

  • 1) the nyt was in the process of producing an expose. they interviewed a “substa

    1) the nyt was in the process of producing an expose. they interviewed a “substantial” number of women.

    2) nbc management found out from staff.

    3) they had prior knowledge for years.

    4) tolerance of it pierces board and officer protections ( i have had this problem with a male exec who was harmless, even cute, and none of the women wanted to prosecute, but counsel is adamant)

    5) they had no choice but to act and act before outed by the nyt.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-11-29 22:40:00 UTC

  • The Rule Of Fives

    You’ve probably heard that the average person can only hold about five items in visual space at any time without resorting to groupings or organizing into grids of one sort or the other. You might have heard that the average person sort of maxes out at remembering a phone number. And that phone numbers are only memorable if broken into a series of numbers each of which consists of less than seven digits. WE can, like mnemonic sentences, poetry, lyrics, or melodies, repeat patterns and recall elements in a series within that pattern, but we cannot very often recall strings of words or numbers without iterating the series. If you look at our language, (english), you will find that most of our verbs describe five to seven states: 1) is doing now 2-3) was just doing, will just do 4-5) was doing, will do 6-7) was always done, wll always do And even so, ‘just doing now’ is a construction. Most of our terms only provide for five states. We need about five ‘registers’ (states) in order to compare two possible courses of action.

  • The Rule Of Fives

    You’ve probably heard that the average person can only hold about five items in visual space at any time without resorting to groupings or organizing into grids of one sort or the other. You might have heard that the average person sort of maxes out at remembering a phone number. And that phone numbers are only memorable if broken into a series of numbers each of which consists of less than seven digits. WE can, like mnemonic sentences, poetry, lyrics, or melodies, repeat patterns and recall elements in a series within that pattern, but we cannot very often recall strings of words or numbers without iterating the series. If you look at our language, (english), you will find that most of our verbs describe five to seven states: 1) is doing now 2-3) was just doing, will just do 4-5) was doing, will do 6-7) was always done, wll always do And even so, ‘just doing now’ is a construction. Most of our terms only provide for five states. We need about five ‘registers’ (states) in order to compare two possible courses of action.