Came across an intriguing contention relative to markets and the disparity between Mengle’s theory of imputation and Adam’s labor theory.
Curiosity has me peering this morning into imputation with one eye on the labor theory (testing binary) in hope to bifurcate my way through if possible, for awhile, and test whether or not claims made by each can reconcile (ternary) with current propertarian positions, and if so, why. If not, why not.
Time constraints may limit me to the basics of imputation theory alone, which is fine.
It is likely that a true binary does not exist of course (never does really), which translates to mean we end up bagging one more carry-along misfit ternary puzzle piece for future resolve.
But the implications so far are heartening.
Not sure if you’ve had the opportunity to perform this test already tho.
Form: Short Note
-
Untitled
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-02 14:44:00 UTC
-
It wasn’t so long ago that it was illegal to refuse your wife sex
It wasn’t so long ago that it was illegal to refuse your wife sex.
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-01 12:05:00 UTC
-
if you read through our fairy tales,keeping in mind that ‘mother’ was replaced w
if you read through our fairy tales,keeping in mind that ‘mother’ was replaced with ‘stepmother’ by victorians, you do not find very kind depictions of mothers. Now, the reason for these characters was, very likely, to teach children that there are far worse mothers out there than the one that they have. But women are not kindly presented in our history. Not that men are either. But the idolization of women was a victorian invention. I read our history and i see struggle and scarcity.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-30 20:19:00 UTC
-
if you read through our fairy tales,keeping in mind that ‘mother’ was replaced w
if you read through our fairy tales,keeping in mind that ‘mother’ was replaced with ‘stepmother’ by victorians, you do not find very kind depictions of mothers. Now, the reason for these characters was, very likely, to teach children that there are far worse mothers out there than the one that they have. But women are not kindly presented in our history. Not that men are either. But the idolization of women was a victorian invention. I read our history and i see struggle and scarcity. -
if you read through our fairy tales,keeping in mind that ‘mother’ was replaced w
if you read through our fairy tales,keeping in mind that ‘mother’ was replaced with ‘stepmother’ by victorians, you do not find very kind depictions of mothers. Now, the reason for these characters was, very likely, to teach children that there are far worse mothers out there than the one that they have. But women are not kindly presented in our history. Not that men are either. But the idolization of women was a victorian invention. I read our history and i see struggle and scarcity. -
Hallmark is single handedly restoring the studio model. Fascinating
Hallmark is single handedly restoring the studio model. Fascinating.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-30 17:42:00 UTC
-
Hallmark is single handedly restoring the studio model. Fascinating
Hallmark is single handedly restoring the studio model. Fascinating. -
Hallmark is single handedly restoring the studio model. Fascinating
Hallmark is single handedly restoring the studio model. Fascinating. -
The pan suppression of masculinity, coupled with dietary/environmental induced h
—The pan suppression of masculinity, coupled with dietary/environmental induced hormone imbalance has contributed to undermine the natural check and balance the males provided for the females of the species. Without that check and balance, women have become cancerous to the body of society they rely on to survive.”— Anne Summers