–“So you’re a supremacist”– (a naive young fool)
I work on the compatibility thesis, and that it’s the distribution of talents in cooperation in a group, not individuals that produce ‘goods’.
Men and women are compatible. The classes, except at the bottom, are compatible. The peoples of the world, if they internalize their own costs of domestication, are compatible.
Only europeans could invent what we have invented, but any people willing to adopt those technologies (including eugenic mating practices) can make use of them.
As for ‘superiority’, europeans have inherited a genetic advantage in the distribution of their talents, just as have the ashkenazi and the east asians. The difference is only that we developed truth independent of its effect on the dominance hierarchy, and a civilization of markets in everything because of it – and no one else did.
All human peoples can transcend the animal. But it comes at the cost of continuous reduction of the underclasses through constraints on reproduction and mating.
That’s just how it is.
So, no. All peoples can transcend.
Form: Short Note
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/29177505_198471544083077_25119317167
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/29177505_198471544083077_251193171677093084_n_198471544083077.jpg (flawless)(flawless)
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-14 10:20:00 UTC
-
I have used the same technique for over thirty years. Never allow others to use
I have used the same technique for over thirty years. Never allow others to use disapproval, ridicule, shaming, and rallying to force you to educate them. Make them do the research on their own. Attempts at theft of one’s time and effort should never be rewarded. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-14 00:12:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973713399644413952
Reply addressees: @LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973710228138151942
IN REPLY TO:
@LibertyBrekfast
@curtdoolittle @nathancofnas Well there’s no point in debate. I said you didn’t respond to a single point by Cofnas, you responded with a declaration that you didn’t need to because you defeat your opponents easily with just 1500 words. Then you declared yourself a genius. In what way should I respond?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973710228138151942
-
My arrogance is born of confidence born of extraordinary discipline, study, effo
My arrogance is born of confidence born of extraordinary discipline, study, effort and criticism. As well as achievement in everything I have tried. -cheers. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 23:39:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973705214569144325
Reply addressees: @LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973701491662958594
IN REPLY TO:
@LibertyBrekfast
@curtdoolittle @nathancofnas Your narcissism is palpable
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973701491662958594
-
And now that I think of it, Kissinger’s book probably makes two points (one of w
And now that I think of it, Kissinger’s book probably makes two points (one of which I’ve stated here), and is probably the most thoughtful work other than Fukuyama’s.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 19:27:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973641609165377537
Reply addressees: @Sonshi_com
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973629656606928896
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973629656606928896
-
There is a website somewhere plays the daily game of matching crimes to arrest p
There is a website somewhere plays the daily game of matching crimes to arrest photos. And it is that data we should find interesting. Not data that is constructed consciously or otherwise to produce an outcome. Lesson from Economics: never use intentionally constructed data.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 18:24:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973625818101493760
Reply addressees: @OppressorBot @jordanbpeterson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973622257405669376
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973622257405669376
-
They have much higher retention of traits than even we do, including everything
They have much higher retention of traits than even we do, including everything from scent to body fat distribution to scale of genitalia and length of legs. And they have a low opinion of human nature. And very little respect for human life (by comparison).
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 18:21:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973625025428410368
Reply addressees: @OppressorBot @jordanbpeterson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973622257405669376
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973622257405669376
-
East asians not only have verb based language rather than noun, and conformity(h
East asians not only have verb based language rather than noun, and conformity(harmony) and non-imposition against the dominance hierarchy, but they failed to solve the problem of politics, and still practice face and continuous deception. It is very hard to compare us.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 18:18:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973624260051816448
Reply addressees: @OppressorBot @jordanbpeterson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973622257405669376
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973622257405669376
-
It’s not so much that any group is superior to any other group so much as that s
It’s not so much that any group is superior to any other group so much as that some groups have been more successful at culling the underclasses. If you can get your median above 105 very good things start to happen. I assume in the future that number will continue to increase
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 17:57:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973619089620037632
Reply addressees: @OppressorBot @jordanbpeterson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973616596391419904
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973616596391419904
-
It’s pretty obvious. Some of us had to mature quickly in high disease gradients
It’s pretty obvious. Some of us had to mature quickly in high disease gradients and some of us could afford to mature more slowly and produce fewer offspring in colder climates. Add prohibition on cousin marriage, the meat grinder of agrarianism/manorialism and underclass shrinks
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 17:55:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973618645128695809
Reply addressees: @OppressorBot @jordanbpeterson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973616596391419904
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973616596391419904