With Annihilation, the market change is complete. The cinemas are now for spectacle, and all good movies will be produced by Netflix and Major Cable. They are already canceling distribution of future releases – even those currently in production.
If we end copyright via creative commons we end them all.
Form: Short Note
-
2018-03-14
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-14 18:45:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973993618083057664
-
Most interesting data: how many americans will testify against a friend who drov
Most interesting data: how many americans will testify against a friend who drove thru a stoplight? How many germans? After that, its a cliff. There is reason the stock market’s in ny, bond in London, industry in germany, and military in russia: who do people trust?
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-14 18:15:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973986010156675075
Reply addressees: @sonshi_com @rockyandmayur
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973976891949494273
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973976891949494273
-
Best indicator of trust is the number of non-governmental, domestically marketed
Best indicator of trust is the number of non-governmental, domestically marketed businesses with over 1000 employees. Low trust societies make many small businesses, and high trust societies large businesses. Low trust require govt support, high trust eschew it.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-14 18:13:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973985433624424448
Reply addressees: @sonshi_com @rockyandmayur
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973976891949494273
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973976891949494273
-
Now measure corruption with reported trust. The chinese and the swedes report hi
Now measure corruption with reported trust. The chinese and the swedes report highest interpersonal trust. But what is the difference in DEMONSTRATED trust? Same for denmark.Danes overrepresent reported happiness simply because it’s rude not to.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-14 18:11:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973985105919258626
Reply addressees: @sonshi_com @rockyandmayur
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973976891949494273
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973976891949494273
-
Homogeneity increases all trust, diversity decreases all trust. As a general rul
Homogeneity increases all trust, diversity decreases all trust.
As a general rule, the size and duration of the middle class determines the trust level because it is commercial society that incentivizes it. https://t.co/5ZMiw6CiBv
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-14 18:10:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973984816294133760
Reply addressees: @sonshi_com @rockyandmayur
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973976891949494273
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973976891949494273
-
(I never understand putting lights on guns. I want my eyes adjusted to the darkn
(I never understand putting lights on guns. I want my eyes adjusted to the darkness, and I don’t want to create a target that everyone can see – and aim at.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-14 16:45:00 UTC
-
How much pleasure does it give us that New Jersey(NYC), Connecticut(Hartford-New
How much pleasure does it give us that New Jersey(NYC), Connecticut(Hartford-NewHaven), Rhode Island(Providence), Illinois(Chicago), Michigan(Detroit), California(Greater LA), are all close to bankruptcy having exhausted all possible rents from producers?
ha. Ha ha. Ha ha ha ha….
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-14 12:49:00 UTC
-
“So you’re a supremacist”– (a naive young fool) I work on the compatibility the
–“So you’re a supremacist”– (a naive young fool) I work on the compatibility thesis, and that it’s the distribution of talents in cooperation in a group, not individuals that produce ‘goods’. Men and women are compatible. The classes, except at the bottom, are compatible. The peoples of the world, if they internalize their own costs of domestication, are compatible. Only europeans could invent what we have invented, but any people willing to adopt those technologies (including eugenic mating practices) can make use of them. As for ‘superiority’, europeans have inherited a genetic advantage in the distribution of their talents, just as have the ashkenazi and the east asians. The difference is only that we developed truth independent of its effect on the dominance hierarchy, and a civilization of markets in everything because of it – and no one else did. All human peoples can transcend the animal. But it comes at the cost of continuous reduction of the underclasses through constraints on reproduction and mating. That’s just how it is. So, no. All peoples can transcend. -
“So you’re a supremacist”– (a naive young fool) I work on the compatibility the
–“So you’re a supremacist”– (a naive young fool)
I work on the compatibility thesis, and that it’s the distribution of talents in cooperation in a group, not individuals that produce ‘goods’.
Men and women are compatible. The classes, except at the bottom, are compatible. The peoples of the world, if they internalize their own costs of domestication, are compatible.
Only europeans could invent what we have invented, but any people willing to adopt those technologies (including eugenic mating practices) can make use of them.
As for ‘superiority’, europeans have inherited a genetic advantage in the distribution of their talents, just as have the ashkenazi and the east asians. The difference is only that we developed truth independent of its effect on the dominance hierarchy, and a civilization of markets in everything because of it – and no one else did.
All human peoples can transcend the animal. But it comes at the cost of continuous reduction of the underclasses through constraints on reproduction and mating.
That’s just how it is.
So, no. All peoples can transcend.
Source date (UTC): 2018-03-14 12:10:00 UTC