FB has to go the telco route and add taboos and dislikes to disassociate people with conflicting interests, thus allowing companies to avoid advertising to, or to advertise to, preferences, interests, taboos and dislikes.
The truth is they already have the data but don’t like the consequences of it.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-16 10:38:00 UTC
Thank you Mr President!!! (Gentle reminder that if you need us, we will be there.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-15 21:32:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/985632069039554560
Reply addressees: @realDonaldTrump
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/985529299905187840
IN REPLY TO:
@realDonaldTrump
Just hit 50% in the Rasmussen Poll, much higher than President Obama at same point. With all of the phony stories and Fake News, it’s hard to believe! Thank you America, we are doing Great Things.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/985529299905187840
(Newbies) Dominance play is necessary to maintain male interest, just as approval-play is necessary for female interest. Lack of that incentive is the reason for male abandonment of any responsibility for the social order: in order to provide coed education we have eliminated the prevalence of dominance play in education. Example: “Russian speaking girls learn english in school, Russian speaking boys learn it from playing video games and reading computer manuals.” I ‘teach’ online by encouraging dominance play – and redirecting it. One of the secrets to the western virtue is that we redirected dominance play to the commons (heroism) rather than to inter-gender, inter-clan, and tribe (kin status). (There is a reason so many very smart, high dominance, super-geeks follow me. I understand this.) Apr 15, 2018 1:14pm
(Newbies) Dominance play is necessary to maintain male interest, just as approval-play is necessary for female interest. Lack of that incentive is the reason for male abandonment of any responsibility for the social order: in order to provide coed education we have eliminated the prevalence of dominance play in education. Example: “Russian speaking girls learn english in school, Russian speaking boys learn it from playing video games and reading computer manuals.” I ‘teach’ online by encouraging dominance play – and redirecting it. One of the secrets to the western virtue is that we redirected dominance play to the commons (heroism) rather than to inter-gender, inter-clan, and tribe (kin status). (There is a reason so many very smart, high dominance, super-geeks follow me. I understand this.) Apr 15, 2018 1:14pm
I care, and work in the interests of, the working, craftsman, and middle classes – what I call the ‘moral’ people. Those of us at the top will always prosper. But elites who abandon their kin soon pay the price. And that price is our civilization. #Trump
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-15 20:04:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/985609898976251904
Our myths split north of the black sea. The western (eventually odin), and eastern (eventually vedic). Then crossed over (shared) again south of the black sea (greek,anatolian, semitic, persian). But the differences remain the same. Authoritarian semitic, I don’t know how to cast persian except ‘like chinese’ as wisdom literature, the indic/vedic, and then the ‘rational’ germanic, roman, greek. So the spectrum of empirical to authoritarian to supernatural works eastward. I don’t know why other than to assume it’s a demographic necessity since we know the anatolians were working on religion as we understand it 8000bc. Even before the british isles were … 3000bc. So it s likely that the henge culture was informed of the anatolian culture. at least by story if not by experience. I assume that the semitic (fertile crescent) peoples had longer to work with the anatolian religion, and so that the persians (east) and the anatolians (west) and the greeks (far west), and the romans (farthest west), were all less affected given the distance. Unfortunately the fertile crescent meant food and that meant underclasses, and that mean authoritarianism. Hunters don’t need that stuff. 😉
Our myths split north of the black sea. The western (eventually odin), and eastern (eventually vedic). Then crossed over (shared) again south of the black sea (greek,anatolian, semitic, persian). But the differences remain the same. Authoritarian semitic, I don’t know how to cast persian except ‘like chinese’ as wisdom literature, the indic/vedic, and then the ‘rational’ germanic, roman, greek. So the spectrum of empirical to authoritarian to supernatural works eastward. I don’t know why other than to assume it’s a demographic necessity since we know the anatolians were working on religion as we understand it 8000bc. Even before the british isles were … 3000bc. So it s likely that the henge culture was informed of the anatolian culture. at least by story if not by experience. I assume that the semitic (fertile crescent) peoples had longer to work with the anatolian religion, and so that the persians (east) and the anatolians (west) and the greeks (far west), and the romans (farthest west), were all less affected given the distance. Unfortunately the fertile crescent meant food and that meant underclasses, and that mean authoritarianism. Hunters don’t need that stuff. 😉
—-”there exists a triangular equivalence in theory of computation between fields. We have philosophy that gives us intuitionistic logic. We have mathematics that gives us category theory. Then in computer science we have type theory”—- The scope of content in those few sentences is priceless. I’m trying to think of how I can deflate it into operational (scientific) language. (ie: Whenever you use the word ‘is’ – the verb-to-be in any of its forms – you don’t understand the causal relations.) a) constant relations (intuition) b) positional relations. (categories) c) dimensional relations. (types) d) symmetric relations (symmetries, externalities, consequences) (models) e) and then repeat at the next level of hierarchy. All we are ever discussing is constant relations in some number of dimensions until we produce new identities (a) that we can define relations between (b) so that we can construct descriptions (c) so that we can model outcomes (d). “Constant relations all the way down’. Apr 15, 2018 6:21pm
—-”there exists a triangular equivalence in theory of computation between fields. We have philosophy that gives us intuitionistic logic. We have mathematics that gives us category theory. Then in computer science we have type theory”—- The scope of content in those few sentences is priceless. I’m trying to think of how I can deflate it into operational (scientific) language. (ie: Whenever you use the word ‘is’ – the verb-to-be in any of its forms – you don’t understand the causal relations.) a) constant relations (intuition) b) positional relations. (categories) c) dimensional relations. (types) d) symmetric relations (symmetries, externalities, consequences) (models) e) and then repeat at the next level of hierarchy. All we are ever discussing is constant relations in some number of dimensions until we produce new identities (a) that we can define relations between (b) so that we can construct descriptions (c) so that we can model outcomes (d). “Constant relations all the way down’. Apr 15, 2018 6:21pm
I mean, the cosmopolitan counter-revolution against science is ending right? Fascism is gradually taking hold. Nationalism gradually taking hold. Marx, Freud, Boas and the Postmoderns falsified, and Dawin, Spencer, and Nietzsche were right.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-15 17:31:00 UTC