Rich people are outliers. It’s not that important that rich people reproduce. Although we should laud the great (noble) families that persist in the reproduction of excellence across generations and ask them to serve us by greater reproduction. But wealth tells us very little. Economies are lotteries, and they must be or people would cease to play the economic game. So in the end, the general necessity is that the middle class is afforded all opportunities to breed, and the underclass is afforded all opportunities to consume rather than breed, so that we constantly defeat the red queen’s regression to the mean.
Propertarianism doesn’t tell people they’re ‘bad’, only that they’re doing what they must. Propertarianism only tells us that the only solution to conflict is to pay the underclasses to protect markets by limiting or eliminate there reproduction and the profound costs they and their descendents place on others. It’s the cheapest investment with the highest returns we can make.
Our group genetic differences are indifferent at scale as long as our distributions of the classes are indifferent at scale. The problem facing all groups is the size of their underclasses: THEY ARE NEVER SMALL ENOUGH.
If you conduct your research with the scientific method, then you will simply attempt to falsify everything until no matter what you do you start producing increasingly similar answers. When you cannot find a way to come to a dissimilar answer then you have either converged on the truth, or some approximation of it given the knowledge, logic, and tools available to us at the time
Ancient (primitive) peoples could not afford to perform experiments that tested the theories (promises, testimony) of the priesthoods. And some of those theories were untestable. We have run those tests today. Even though we could not afford them. And the result was the dark ages, and the continental enlightenment/marxist/postmodernist attempt to return to them.
Awed at the irony that @Starbucks, which is the most anti-white, anti-christian, anti-male, politically correct, publicly traded company in the business of selling overpriced diabetes-bait on the US Exchange is the target of black ire, for not giving away scarce space. ???
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/30741116_10156294884077264_5077207752590229504_o_10156294884072264.jpg the only thing really interesting in this year’s survey:Stephen KlostermeierYou were named dropped in Andy Warski’s show tonight. Should see if you can get on to talk propertarianism.Apr 17, 2018 9:19pmAustyn Pemberwhen?Apr 17, 2018 9:24pmStephen KlostermeierIn the middle of the show. Someone donated and asked them about itApr 17, 2018 9:25pmCurt Doolittle(who is andy warki?)Apr 17, 2018 9:35pmAustyn Pembermost popular YT streamer right now (in the political sphere)Apr 17, 2018 9:37pmStephen KlostermeierAverages around 4k live viewers every showApr 17, 2018 9:37pmStephen KlostermeierHis co-host is also one of the leading scientists in the alt-right.Apr 17, 2018 9:42pmBen HartselleHe’s hosted guys like Jared Taylor, Mike Enoch and Ry DawsonApr 17, 2018 9:43pmJames CohenCurt, please talk to Sven and Enoch and see if they can get you in contact with Warski. Getting on Warski Live would do wonders for your outreach.Apr 17, 2018 9:43pmStephen KlostermeierI just dropped it in his chat. I am one of his mods. I can dm him on twitter if Curt is interestedApr 17, 2018 9:44pmBen HartselleI mean, I just Emailed him to get Ry Dawson on.Apr 17, 2018 9:45pmStephen KlostermeierBut I agree it would be great for him. He needs more exposure and Andy has a great platform.Apr 17, 2018 9:48pmDaniel Travis@[100000806477516:2048:Stephen Klostermeier] 100% agreeApr 17, 2018 9:55pmMegan K. UsuiAsk him to get Curt to debate Dyer LOLApr 17, 2018 9:55pmStephen Klostermeier@[741197263:2048:Curt Doolittle] Are you interested?Apr 17, 2018 9:55pmMegan K. UsuiCurt – these are (the most popular) children IMO. Better let Eli talk to them.Apr 17, 2018 9:58pmMegan K. Usui@Stephen. Please promote Eli of the Propertarian Institute. I insist.Apr 17, 2018 10:02pmStephen KlostermeierChildren or not. The platform has a LOT of pull right now.Apr 17, 2018 10:02pmStephen KlostermeierCurt was the one name dropped. Jf said he is planning on reading up on Curt and his ideas.
It’s a really good opportunityApr 17, 2018 10:08pmAustyn PemberThey are looking for a lot of entertainment value, not in education.Apr 17, 2018 10:08pmStephen KlostermeierThey had Ryan Dawson on… That dude is not entertaining but VERY infightful.
It’s all good if he doesn’t want too. I can help him get on if he does tho.Apr 17, 2018 10:11pmMegan K. Usui@[100000806477516:2048:Stephen] – please send JF this link: https://propertarianism.com/2018/03/29/propertarianism-core-concepts-by-eli-harman/Apr 17, 2018 10:13pmStephen KlostermeierHe has it.Apr 17, 2018 10:14pmChris MoyerGood, now I can stop spam posting him on twitter about it 😂Apr 17, 2018 10:18pmMegan K. UsuiTell them Curt will do it if he can continue his debate with Dyer from two years ago when Dyer fled to the mattresses. That will be entertainment.Apr 17, 2018 10:19pmStephen KlostermeierIf Curt wants to do it. They can set that upApr 17, 2018 10:20pmStephen KlostermeierIn fact that is kinda their whole platform right now.Apr 17, 2018 10:23pmMegan K. Usui@[741197263:2048:Curt] they’re going to see if Dyer will accept. He’s gonna punk out. But if he accepts…..remember you promised me 😘Apr 17, 2018 10:33pmJesse RobersonHis name is Adam race WarskiApr 18, 2018 11:37amJesse Robersonhttps://youtu.be/1-ygbmjqE3oApr 18, 2018 11:38amStephen KlostermeierWelp……. Dyer is legitmately afraid to have another debate with Curt. lmaoApr 19, 2018 12:10amMegan K. UsuiMaybe we’ll have @[741197263:2048:Curt] record a “hey you munchkin” vid especially for Jay and JF can air that right before pitting ELI UP AGAINST BLONDE IN THE BELLY OF THE BEAST ON REPEALING THE 19TH.Apr 19, 2018 12:42amthe only thing really interesting in this year’s survey:
I’m just staying on message:
Understand we are going to enter into conflict.
Understand we have offered no solution, just criticism.
We will offer a solution then promise conflict.
We will opportunistically pursue the three possible lines of conflict.
And then concentrate on what ‘works’.
And they will fold rather quickly.
And if not, we ‘win’ by starving them out.
And in not we ‘win’ by the ‘not us’ groups demonstrating their latent tendencies – removing all doubt about our arguments.
Apr 17, 2018 12:20pm
