Curt Doolittle

Form: Short Note

  • SORRY, BUT BOOMERS > JONES GENERATION > GEN X. Jones is a bridge generation. Tha

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_JonesGENERATIONS: SORRY, BUT BOOMERS > JONES GENERATION > GEN X.

    Jones is a bridge generation.

    That’s me, Gates, Jobs, Ellison and such.

    We’re the ones who grew up with the oil crisis, iran hostages, and terrible unemployment, the first personal computers, space shuttle explosion, and the reagan revolution.

    Did you have a TI? TRS-80? Commodore? Amiga? Apple 1?

    Was the movie “Wall Street” your career ambition? Were you called a Yuppie? Did you wear skinny ties? Punk Much? Did you see the first star wars, alien, and blade runner in the theate? Did you read Neuromancer and snow crash when they came out and try to bring that world about?

    The problem is that demographers use the rates of population and sociologists use the experiences and motivations. My generatoin has none of the slacker reputation of gen x, just the opposite.

    We were raised with the highest expectations and promises, only to emerge into our teens to see the catastrophe of 1970’s, the consequences of the Great Society Movement, the crime, the drugs, the decay, the unemployment, the Carter administration and we sought opportunity in the technical revolution to work our asses off and make it big’

    TO KEEP UP WITH THE JONESES. Hence the name.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-03 20:39:00 UTC

  • YA SO 1) For every 1 percent increase in their hourly wage, low-wage workers saw

    https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-06-26/seattle-s-painful-lesson-on-the-road-to-a-15-minimum-wageTOLD YA SO

    1) For every 1 percent increase in their hourly wage, low-wage workers saw a 3 percent reduction in the number of hours worked. As a result, they lost about $125 in earnings a month, clawing back the entire gain from the earlier hike and more.

    2) THE EFFECT IS NON LINEAR AND ACCELERATES RAPIDLY

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-03 20:23:00 UTC

  • WE GET ALONG. THE DIVISION OF LABOR. READ IT. COMMENT. @[100009672279790:2048:Ri

    http://freetheanimal.com/2018/05/synchronicity-libertarians-conservatives.htmlHOW WE GET ALONG. THE DIVISION OF LABOR. READ IT. COMMENT.

    @[100009672279790:2048:Richard Nikoley] Covers the intertemporal division of perception, cognition, labor, and advocacy.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-03 18:57:00 UTC

  • WE GET ALONG. THE DIVISION OF LABOR. READ IT. COMMENT. Richard Nikoley Covers th

    http://freetheanimal.com/2018/05/synchronicity-libertarians-conservatives.htmlHOW WE GET ALONG. THE DIVISION OF LABOR. READ IT. COMMENT.

    Richard Nikoley Covers the intertemporal division of perception, cognition, labor, and advocacy.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-03 18:57:00 UTC

  • Revolution: Scribe the dike and let the sheer weight of the water do the work

    As I’ve said before, the ratio of police to citizens is very low, and the number of casualties they will absorb before they stay in the barracks or stay home is under ten percent. They are not 19 year old single male soldiers, with combined arms, but 105 IQ working class high dominance men with families, getting overpaid with good pensions – they are mercenaries and mercenaries always fold. In a PLANNED revolution, everything depends on the demands. Make moral demands that solve the problems of political, social, and economic conflict, and those who choose sides will act rationally by those incentives not out of fear and uncertainty. In chaos people will hold order as long as they hold confidence. All humans are predictable. The proletarian anarchists will tie down the national guard and the police. If the working and middle classes are told to store food and water and medicine for three months, they have the money and credit to do so. The underclass anarchists do not. If the disruption is sufficient for the regular military to be called, the financial markets and foreign powers will do the rest. Never fight a battle directly. Scribe the dike and let the sheer weight of the water do the work. With the right direction and incentives the military will achieve in government what is in their and the people’s interests.

  • Revolution: Scribe the dike and let the sheer weight of the water do the work

    As I’ve said before, the ratio of police to citizens is very low, and the number of casualties they will absorb before they stay in the barracks or stay home is under ten percent. They are not 19 year old single male soldiers, with combined arms, but 105 IQ working class high dominance men with families, getting overpaid with good pensions – they are mercenaries and mercenaries always fold. In a PLANNED revolution, everything depends on the demands. Make moral demands that solve the problems of political, social, and economic conflict, and those who choose sides will act rationally by those incentives not out of fear and uncertainty. In chaos people will hold order as long as they hold confidence. All humans are predictable. The proletarian anarchists will tie down the national guard and the police. If the working and middle classes are told to store food and water and medicine for three months, they have the money and credit to do so. The underclass anarchists do not. If the disruption is sufficient for the regular military to be called, the financial markets and foreign powers will do the rest. Never fight a battle directly. Scribe the dike and let the sheer weight of the water do the work. With the right direction and incentives the military will achieve in government what is in their and the people’s interests.

  • “Getting To Denmark”

    I don’t have the luxury of those arguments because I’m not trying to make excuses for the past, only to correct the present, and prevent catastrophes in the future. The fact that a people can do well in a germanic country says nothing about them and everything about the germanic country. The question I want to solve is HOW DO YOU MAKE DENMARK WITHOUT DANES? “Getting To Denmark” is a ‘term of art’ or ‘term of convenience’ so to speak in political theory. It means, how do you produce a technologically advanced, high trust polity with high tolerance for redistribution and low political conflict.

  • “Getting To Denmark”

    I don’t have the luxury of those arguments because I’m not trying to make excuses for the past, only to correct the present, and prevent catastrophes in the future. The fact that a people can do well in a germanic country says nothing about them and everything about the germanic country. The question I want to solve is HOW DO YOU MAKE DENMARK WITHOUT DANES? “Getting To Denmark” is a ‘term of art’ or ‘term of convenience’ so to speak in political theory. It means, how do you produce a technologically advanced, high trust polity with high tolerance for redistribution and low political conflict.

  • Um. I think you’ll at least understand my restatement of history, once you under

    Um. I think you’ll at least understand my restatement of history, once you understand deflationary and critical vs inflationary, conflationary, and fictional grammars.

    I am tracking the technologies of truth and deception, and group evolutionary strategy using those grammars, just as you would track the history of linguistics, genes, pottery, or metallurgy.

    And I track economics not literature.

    And I understand that man seizes opportunities then justifies them.

    And I understand the desire for literature in some classes and results in other classes throughout history.

    And once you have these understandings, you also attribute very different values and incentives to historical events, just as knowledge of science forced us to rewrite our understanding and history.

    Now, you might say I err, but do I err, but it’s extremely unlikely that I err. Because we need do nothing more than study the economics (incentives), and grammars (excuses) to determine whether people acted morally in fact, or immorally, casting themselves as moral.

    I am not misguided. My understanding of history is very clearly, the initiation of indo europeans, and the socially destabilizing counter-revolutions against their innovations, because meritocracy, reciprocity, sovereignty, and markets are a threat to every single old order.

    The problem that you’ll face is providing superior explanatory power with greater parsimony, without appealing to knowledge that can’t exist in time and space.

    You don’t know that (yet).

    but that’s what you’re dealing with.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-03 12:21:00 UTC

  • The Rebellion Continues

    I mean, I don’t know were current mythology and propaganda developed, but Judaism is a counter-revolution against (a) hellenic reason because of the conquest of alexander (hellenic judaism), (b) roman law under the conquest of rome (rabbinical judaism), (c) and western science (socialism: boas, marx, freud, cantor, lenin/trotsky, mises, rand/rothbard) The entire history of judaism is merely inverting western truth, reason, law, and technology as a means of resistance, undermining, and insurrection. Whatever innovation in truth we bring the world, they have produced a counter-revolution by which to return people to ignorance. Why? (The female brain). Seriously. And the data increasingly suggests it.